I also prefer corruption over blackmail, but I speculate that blackmail enjoyers like prolonging the "hates it but forced into it" phase of such interactions whereas corruption enjoyers want to see the "begins liking it" phase. I dunno, I just like speculating about the mindset behind various fetishes.Not kinkshaming nobody but blackmail it's the worst, My mind can't understand how con anybody can prefer blackmail over straight corruption lol.
Dang. Hold on there busterThank you god for this update gift today. To see a beautiful heroine corrupted beyond recognition into a Queen of Spade is good for the soul. My balls are about to be decimated today.
1. Still cuckery imo1. Sherise is acting on Jeromes behalf in order to make it possible for him to fuck Tiffany by distracting Mike. So no cucking. He is using his wife for that.
2. He is in no relationship with Tiffany, so it's not "sharing" what he does with Jose but whoring her out.
I respect your opinion, but that's because you are framing it strictly as "NTR". That you speak of "bull" at all here shows that. Bull is a function/position in the constellation or framework of NTR seen from the standpoint of the relationship. I wouldn't regard this as NTR at all. Technically you could call it that in terms of cheating but narratively it is the corruption genre. So the focus isn't on the original relationship (NTR and NTS are always relationship-focused). I don't know if you read the original story on literotica. The focus (and the erotic appeal I guess) is on the girl herself (or at the most on the new "relation" to Jerome as corruptor and master), all other figures are just narrative functions to bring that about. Anyway, I think these differences in framings are interesting. Of course if you have played hundreds of NTR NTS games (not saying you have) you tend to expect and see it that way.I understand under hard-line definitions it could be perceived like this, just like how sister NTR etc is sometimes bullshitted as not ntr. But I'm just speaking as my personal preference as a lover of NTR, and seeing the bull do this stuff is such a fucking turn off.
I have played pretty much every NTR game on this site since 2017, and just saying I hate this setup. For me, not the actual definitions, but for me personally, soon as the bull/antagonist w/e shares his conquests, bam immediate turn off. Just one of my personal preferences, like how I hate it any time the MC get's any action.I respect your opinion, but that's because you are framing it strictly as "NTR". That you speak of "bull" at all here shows that. Bull is a function/position in the constellation or framework of NTR seen from the standpoint of the relationship. I wouldn't regard this as NTR at all. Technically you could call it that in terms of cheating but narratively it is the corruption genre. So the focus isn't on the original relationship (NTR and NTS are always relationship-focused). I don't know if you read the original story on literotica. The focus (and the erotic appeal I guess) is on the girl herself (or at the most on the new "relation" to Jerome as corruptor and master), all other figures are just narrative functions to bring that about. Anyway, I think these differences in framings are interesting. Of course if you have played hundreds of NTR NTS games (not saying you have) you tend to expect and see it that way.
In other cases that I myself view as NTR of NTS I would agree with you, and I myself have argued against the diluting of that genrre in the direction of "swinging" "sharing" where everybody fucks everybody. So there I agree with you actually.
Yeah, on the basis that it's NTR I can understand you completely, I feel the same when I regard something as NTR (or NTS also).I have played pretty much every NTR game on this site since 2017, and just saying I hate this setup. For me, not the actual definitions, but for me personally, soon as the bull/antagonist w/e shares his conquests, bam immediate turn off. Just one of my personal preferences, like how I hate it any time the MC get's any action