I'll note that IMHO a well formed pack is at least 1/3 non-hentai images. For these I use DeviantArt, pintrest, and even Google Images.
For R34 I do use a number of the boorus, but I also use things like pixiv, e-hentai, and imagefap.
--------------------------------------------------
As for rating packs, there's really no easy way to rate them numerically to get useful information beyond what the existing rating gives. And this is coming from someone who gave up bothering with the existing rating long ago. That's why I don't mention such ratings when I release packs, because I rarely even check what rating my packs have ended up with.
Several times there has been talk about creating some sort of curation system, a bit like Steam uses. The technical steps needed to set such up are not a huge problem. The real problem is that any sort of curation system would require a massive amount of time and effort from the curators themselves. And getting people willing to put such effort into reviewing packs isn't likely to work out. We're not Steam. We're a niche fan game.
But beyond our current, very limited, rating counter and a massive effort curation system I've yet to see a decent third option for somehow conveying the idea of which packs are better than which other packs.
For R34 I do use a number of the boorus, but I also use things like pixiv, e-hentai, and imagefap.
--------------------------------------------------
As for rating packs, there's really no easy way to rate them numerically to get useful information beyond what the existing rating gives. And this is coming from someone who gave up bothering with the existing rating long ago. That's why I don't mention such ratings when I release packs, because I rarely even check what rating my packs have ended up with.
Several times there has been talk about creating some sort of curation system, a bit like Steam uses. The technical steps needed to set such up are not a huge problem. The real problem is that any sort of curation system would require a massive amount of time and effort from the curators themselves. And getting people willing to put such effort into reviewing packs isn't likely to work out. We're not Steam. We're a niche fan game.
But beyond our current, very limited, rating counter and a massive effort curation system I've yet to see a decent third option for somehow conveying the idea of which packs are better than which other packs.
Last edited: