Google's WebM. Search the thread a bit, converters and general use have been discussed before.How are you getting short videos/animations loops to play I've been putting some packs together and cannot get gifs/mp4s to work
Manually? _neronero is sort of doing this ATM.Also is there some other way to review/rate packs other then the image tagging tool or posting it here?
You're probably misunderstanding what the rating is. It's not how good the pack is (pictures and tag appropriateness, which are hard to judge even for a human), it's how comprehensive (the alphabetical rating) and varied (the +/- rating) the tagging is. You can very much mistag a pack into a state where only a lunatic would use it, but abuse the tagging system to get an A+ rating.4/4 are rated as B+ (I don't trust this)
Eh, even veteran taggers have trouble with that one.thanks naked tag
No-one's going to laugh at you. Make it available, ask Leortha for a review (privately, if you wish), and update the pack afterwards.I would like some input other than that tool or making them publicly available yet.
Read Darknoob'sFinally just looking for extra places to try and find some pics to shore up some packs any sites other than the usual hentai foundry, ex-hentai, R34, and various boorus you could recommend?
Try a google search with girl name and animated gif tags, you may also find some websites gathering a lot of animations. If you need conversion to webm try this online converter:How are you getting short videos/animations loops to play I've been putting some packs together and cannot get gifs/mp4s to work, I remember seeing somewhere they were being converted into something else as a workaround for renpy but can't find it again or convert them into something else that works. Is there a tool or guide somewhere for this?
Nice suggestion, i search some ideas for girlpacks to train my grilpacker skills !Gotta say this, initially, i was surprised no one has made a Monika (DDLC) pack. (Based on the Google Sheet)
Apparently, we lack proper catgirls (we have a number of the more furry variety, but not much in the way of the classical 'girl with cat ears and tail and not much else' ). Kite suggested a number of candidatesTell me some girl suggestions, please
I'm not worried about that really. It is an internet forum (for a porn game no less) people can act how they like I won't take it personally. I just think if I'm contributing to a project I would rather do something good then throw a bunch of mediocre stuff into the mix especially all at once and with how much is already in there. (seriously there are like 1k packs it's insane). More a pride in work kind of thing I guess.No-one's going to laugh at you. Make it available, ask Leortha for a review (privately, if you wish), and update the pack afterwards.
I more or less figured just off the packs I had downloaded previously that the ranking system was more about coverage then actual quality I still just feel like looking through the packs I made I had far better coverage on some than others but they all ended up the same rating. That seemed very odd to me I should have explained that better.You're probably misunderstanding what the rating is. It's not how good the pack is (pictures and tag appropriateness, which are hard to judge even for a human), it's how comprehensive (the alphabetical rating) and varied (the +/- rating) the tagging is.
This is actually super helpful thank you. Now I just need to test the packs to make sure the animations actually work. I already had several animations but just could not get them to work and knew it was a formatting issue. Another reason I was thinking about working on a pack for Ivy(soulcalibur) or Shepard(Mass Effect) since I know they have a ton of animations. Those would be much later though since I'm basically going to run through the packs I have again and would most likely be personal projects.Try a google search with girl name and animated gif tags, you may also find some websites gathering a lot of animations. If you need conversion to webm try this online converter:You must be registered to see the links
If you have the tagging/naming tool up to date, you should be able to use this for your testing. The code to support animations is identical between the tagging tool and the latest versions of 0.2. So if a given animation plays in the tagging tool, it should be good to go for playing in the game itself. And with the tagging tool it's much easier to trigger specific images/animations on demand.This is actually super helpful thank you. Now I just need to test the packs to make sure the animations actually work. I already had several animations but just could not get them to work and knew it was a formatting issue.