- Dec 27, 2017
- 353
- 460
Like it or don't like, either play or move on. Watching the content is not compulsory!
agreed.While I 100% agree with you, I'd suggest learning to watch other people's insecurities from a distance and either ignore or turn it around as a joke. I mean some things can be discussed to a point, but when the person in front of you is blinded by their own insecurities, it quickly becomes impossible to discuss (with a serious tone at least) about the focus of said insecurities.
Also there's too much people here for the entire community to be open-minded about everything. The more people, the more insecurity you'll find. Much like MC's dick, insecurities are infiltrating everywhere.
Now I haven't read the whole shenanigans but again, here are the official internet rules of no homo for people who missed it two months ago :
These are the official rules guys, nothing you can do about it. Source : this picture you just saw.
Now all of you insecure fellas can be disgusted by us straight males who enjoy virtually fucking the shit out of a young trap because he's as cute as a girl and delightfully submissive.
View attachment 2667640
Born a man, so be one and don't follow the crowd that fell for the advertising of contraceptives. After all, the word "gay" does not initially mean that a man in love with another man's ass.Ok, I have had enough. Time to burst:
The gay tag is not on this game to let gay men know there is a game for them. The gay tag is on this game as a warning for the insecure who think that making eye contact with a one-eyed-snake is going to turn them faggot. I feel bad for actual gay men, in this context (well other contexts too, they get shit on all the time. and not just literally.) as this is not a game made for gay men and they could betrappedtricked (ironic?).
Gayness is more about being attracted to masculinity and not femininity, not penis on penis love.
I thought this shit was obvious. Guess not. Then again, when I found this place I thought, "My people! I have found an open-minded community. Surely, my fellow perverts won't be judging each other like the rest of the world judges us." holy fuck was I wrong.
There may be more insecurity here than most places. Life is so full of irony.
[Now to pucker my own asshole for the inevitable tantrums.]
There is already one, but please use the search function in F95zone now for that since they don't get added anymore on the main page.Is there gonna be compressed version of this game?
You're wasting your breath dude, trust me, this debate has been going on forever, sadly.While I 100% agree with you, I'd suggest learning to watch other people's insecurities from a distance and either ignore or turn it around as a joke. I mean some things can be discussed to a point, but when the person in front of you is blinded by their own insecurities, it quickly becomes impossible to discuss (with a serious tone at least) about the focus of said insecurities.
Also there's too much people here for the entire community to be open-minded about everything. The more people, the more insecurity you'll find. Much like MC's dick, insecurities are infiltrating everywhere.
Now I haven't read the whole shenanigans but again, here are the official internet rules of no homo for people who missed it two months ago :
These are the official rules guys, nothing you can do about it. Source : this picture you just saw.
Now all of you insecure fellas can be disgusted by us straight males who enjoy virtually fucking the shit out of a young trap because he's as cute as a girl and delightfully submissive.
View attachment 2667640
Not forever... 2000 years maybe... Jesus said "love thy fellow man" and Judas said "no homo"You're wasting your breath dude, trust me, this debate has been going on forever, sadly.
Not to mention "buttfucking another male is not geh if he's not masculine enough" might come from the romans.Not forever... 2000 years maybe... Jesus said "love thy fellow man" and Judas said "no homo"
That's where you got it from?))) The word sodomy, by which this action began to appear (sodomy was not originally with a woman, but with a man), appeared only in dictionaries of all countries no earlier than the 15th century. So now the question is, what does the Roman Empire have to do with it?))) Or do you believe fairy tales more?)))Not to mention "buttfucking another male is not geh if he's not masculine enough" might come from the romans.
From the Satyricon, among other bits & pieces of latin literature. But there are actual academic treatises comparing roman & greek views on sexuality, how they both diverge from & influence each other and from the western society that would come later. You can also get a starting point on the subjectThat's where you got it from?))) The word sodomy, by which this action began to appear (sodomy was not originally with a woman, but with a man), appeared only in dictionaries of all countries no earlier than the 15th century. So now the question is, what does the Roman Empire have to do with it?))) Or do you believe fairy tales more?)))
You think Sodomy was invented in the 15 century???, people only became uptight about where you stuck your cock in recent centuries, "we must outbreed those people who don't share our faith" ... beginning the trend of ostracising & persecuting those deemed to not doing their part in making new faithful.That's where you got it from?))) The word sodomy, by which this action began to appear (sodomy was not originally with a woman, but with a man), appeared only in dictionaries of all countries no earlier than the 15th century. So now the question is, what does the Roman Empire have to do with it?))) Or do you believe fairy tales more?)))
I've got amazing news. Guess which body part men stared growing no earlier than 200 years ago ... according to the dictionaries... The word sodomy, by which this action began to appear (sodomy was not originally with a woman, but with a man), appeared only in dictionaries of all countries no earlier than the 15th century ...
What outright nonsense... And what does the growth have to do with it, if the article is about the frequency of mentioning the word?I've got amazing news. Guess which body part men stared growing no earlier than 200 years ago ... according to the dictionaries
View attachment 2669574
This whole waste paper was written no earlier than the 17th century, and if it refers to some "ancient" source, then at most it turns out that this is supposedly a list from some ancient source, which (that's the horror of what) was lost. The question is, how did they rewrite it so that the draft was ruined))) Don't get into a debate.From the Satyricon, among other bits & pieces of latin literature. But there are actual academic treatises comparing roman & greek views on sexuality, how they both diverge from & influence each other and from the western society that would come later. You can also get a starting point on the subjectYou must be registered to see the links, if you care to. I'm honestly in "the debate" more for entertainment than anything.
And what does ostracism have to do with it? Do you at least know that ostracism is a form of extrajudicial punishment by voting followed by expulsion from the settlement for 10 years???You think Sodomy was invented in the 15 century???, people only became uptight about where you stuck your cock in recent centuries, "we must outbreed those people who don't share our faith" ... beginning the trend of ostracising & persecuting those deemed to not doing their part in making new faithful.
Dude do you consider Wikipedia the source of all knowledge? even in the original Greek usage it wasn't exclusively used after a vote and dollars to donuts the 10 years wouldn't stand as accurate either, people would either be exiled forever or sneak back in sooner.And what does ostracism have to do with it? Do you at least know that ostracism is a form of extrajudicial punishment by voting followed by expulsion from the settlement for 10 years???
do you realise that ChatGPT is not a reliable source of information?!?I've got amazing news. Guess which body part men stared growing no earlier than 200 years ago ... according to the dictionaries
View attachment 2669574
What does it matter? Language is fluid, words change through the ages.do you realise that ChatGPT is not a reliable source of information?!?
Well, you made me laugh. For your information, I have a master's degree in law, and definitions such as ostracism, if I remember correctly, are included in the basic course. And don't make me laugh with your sources of information (I'm talking about Wikipedia). Don't go there, there's such nonsense that you'll take away all the saints. For 3 years there was a reference to the fact that the formula of water is C2H5OH)))Dude do you consider Wikipedia the source of all knowledge? even in the original Greek usage it wasn't exclusively used after a vote and dollars to donuts the 10 years wouldn't stand as accurate either, people would either be exiled forever or sneak back in sooner.
What exactly do you hope to gain by being so pedantic? In modern usage to be ostracized means to be shunned, set apart.