- Jan 20, 2020
- 2,874
- 4,266
gofile works fine for me.gofile has been giving me an error message on all the links I've used for the past few days but still works with jdownloader.
gofile works fine for me.gofile has been giving me an error message on all the links I've used for the past few days but still works with jdownloader.
Exaggerated physical features are a core tenant of fantasy.Horrifying, art work. characters limbs out of proportion from the main body. Plus the story like just is not for me. Find it sick and revolting. But Good luck with the concept and idea. No offense meant just saying it could have been better than a wam bam thank you mam kind of game.
That worked tooGofile links work fine for me. Have you tried opening the links in windows incognito mode?
That's good so now you have two ways to download when you need it. I've had to use this option before when trying to download from zippy as it would throw up 400 errors whenever I tried to download from there but when using incognito mode the page appeared fine.That worked too
Ah, sorry to be a nuisance again, but what you actually want to ask of them is lowering the quality setting on their encoder. As a matter of fact, mozjepg does a fine job in this particular case:Addendum: While I'm here, could I suggest switching from .Jpeg to .WebP, for a smaller download? Many thanks!
1.8 GiB [################] /input
433.7 MiB [### ] /pio_webp
433.0 MiB [### ] /webp_90
366.8 MiB [### ] /pio_jpeg
-jpeg_like
). Much of what this means can be gleamed from going down this here rabbit hole, but the gist of it is that the output of pio is of near equal quality (as the tool tries to reach a specific SSIM rating in either case) showing mozjepg to be the better choice in this case.-q 90 -preset photo -m 6 -pass 10 -af
is a safe bet.I'm outraged, outraged I tell you!Ah, sorry to be a nuisance again
If I can understand what is said above "pio's jpeg" < Never heard of that before, but how do i switch to it if size can be reduced without loss of quality. Also since i'm dangerously close to being computer illiterate, please explain to me like I'm 3.Ah, sorry to be a nuisance again, but what you actually want to ask of them is lowering the quality setting on their encoder. As a matter of fact, mozjepg does a fine job in this particular case:
The above shows the sizes of the original renders versus the output of pio to both formats (with a base jpeg quality of 85 adjusted by image complexity) as well as the one of cwebp using a quality setting of 90 (notBash:1.8 GiB [################] /input 433.7 MiB [### ] /pio_webp 433.0 MiB [### ] /webp_90 366.8 MiB [### ] /pio_jpeg
-jpeg_like
). Much of what this means can be gleamed from going down this here rabbit hole, but the gist of it is that the output of pio is of near equal quality (as the tool tries to reach a specific SSIM rating in either case) showing mozjepg to be the better choice in this case.
That being said, when in doubt, using cwebp withYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.-q 90 -preset photo -m 6 -pass 10 -af
is a safe bet.
Vinyard, see above.
a quick google search gaveIf I can understand what is said above "pio's jpeg" < Never heard of that before, but how do i switch to it if size can be reduced without loss of quality. Also since i'm dangerously close to being computer illiterate, please explain to me like I'm 3.
Thank you! Do take note however that the second paragraph in your third link about WEBP being around 30 percent smaller than comparable JPEG files assumes both a best case scenario as well as the absence of mojzpeg (as in using base cjepg only) – it's a doctored result, really. And while cwebp does perform very well, it's output isn't necessarily better (as in of a smaller size at the same perceived quality) than mozjpeg's. In case of this game's renders, the numbers are actually reversed.a quick google search gave
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
Sorry! I tend to drop stuff like this without much consideration for a recipients' technical background.If I can understand what is said above "pio's jpeg" < Never heard of that before, but how do i switch to it if size can be reduced without loss of quality. Also since i'm dangerously close to being computer illiterate, please explain to me like I'm 3.
Unintentional, but funnier now that you mention it Thanks for reminding me how old I am!Married With Children fan?
err... anyone got a google translation of this in English?Ah, sorry to be a nuisance again, but what you actually want to ask of them is lowering the quality setting on their encoder. As a matter of fact, mozjepg does a fine job in this particular case:
The above shows the sizes of the original renders versus the output of pio to both formats (with a base jpeg quality of 85 adjusted by image complexity) as well as the one of cwebp using a quality setting of 90 (notBash:1.8 GiB [################] /input 433.7 MiB [### ] /pio_webp 433.0 MiB [### ] /webp_90 366.8 MiB [### ] /pio_jpeg
-jpeg_like
). Much of what this means can be gleamed from going down this here rabbit hole, but the gist of it is that the output of pio is of near equal quality (as the tool tries to reach a specific SSIM rating in either case) showing mozjepg to be the better choice in this case.
That being said, when in doubt, using cwebp withYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.-q 90 -preset photo -m 6 -pass 10 -af
is a safe bet.
That heavily depends on your definition of 'content'. You cannot opt to have Riley not be a femboy and you will be shown him doing ballet with Pam and later having his ass fingered by Hailey (which should probably be made optional), but it won't get more explicit than this:So ... from briefly browsing this thread I think the answer to my question is no but what the hell, ill ask anyway, maybe things changed.
Is the trap content optional? also, what does this content entail? Dunno if i should continue playing or not, im not into trap at all. I like what ive seen so far but am a bit put off by that tag.