Well if you guys just threat and enforce ur rules equally to everyone, there wont be any arguments like these, why make the rules if in the end you gonna mass vote if something is allowed or not and if enough staff like the content they gonna allow it even if it break ur own rules.
This is only few examples you allow on ur site on games I played and they clearly break rule7:
You must be registered to see the links
meanwhile smaller creators like Teenx is not allowed with girls that are not prepubescent and don't break rule7, and if he does, how come much younger girls with not even developed chests are allowed that are clear as day prepubescent.
I dont want neither of them to get banned but if you ban creators like Teenx that have older models and clearly not prepubescent girls then how come you guys dont enforce rule7 on clearly prepubescent content? How is this fair for other creators like Teenx? Is it really that hard to threat everyone equally?
A good rule of thumb is before replying, stop and think, think some more and then after typing out your reply, re-read and think some more before hitting post.
Well if you guys just threat and enforce ur rules equally to everyone
How would you suggest they do that AND be fair? HS and DAZ are more realistic than Koikatsu, 2d ranges from chibi and cartoon to photo-realistic, are you saying they should all be held to the same standard? Now that would be unfair.
why make the rules if in the end you gonna mass vote if something is allowed or not and if enough staff like the content they gonna allow it even if it break ur own rules.
First a correction, "
if enough staff like" in order to make sure that something is NOT being judged too lightly or too harshly, more opinions are brought in to make it as fair as possible. Just because you and a handful of others want to believe it is about liked or disliked does NOT make it true. If you stopped to actually think about it, you would see this is the fairest way to decide.
On to the second part, "even if it break ur own rules", its
their rules, so if they decide it is allowed then it DOESN'T break
their rules.
This is only few examples you allow on ur site on games I played and they clearly break rule7:
As has been pointed out
MANY times now, in
MANY threads, the mods and staff are unable to play EVERY game and EVERY update that gets posted to this site. They rely on adults actually acting like adults and when seeing one of these games, reporting it so it can be reviewed.
If you stopped and actually thought about it and thought about the alternatives, remembering these are volunteers with their own lives too....
They could review EVERYTHING before it got linked but having to do that
AND handle adults acting like children in threads, dealing with reports, dealing with tickets, dealing with feedback e.g. site problems / new site updates etc. members would be lucky to get 2 games a week. and everyone looses....
They could ban ALL of it, many in the community would loose access to already posted games and their updates, future games and the flood of "why's" and "it's not fairs" threads would pour in creating an even larger workload for the mods and staff. Arguments in threads, PM, tickets, reports all coming in as to why game Y is not against rule 7 and why was game Z banned and again everyone looses....
They could allow ALL of it, given the recent history of posting by some members and the fact that many adults here can't act like adults, there will be a flood of complaints from the haters, A LOT of questionable to straight up illegal content being posted which would again cause a larger workload for the mods and staff, put the site in increased danger of being shut down, put the mods and staff in danger of legal action and when the site gets shut down all members will have to try and find another safe site and again everyone looses.... Good luck finding one that comes close to F95.
All of those options are loose / loose, right now they are doing their best and walking a fine line to allow members access to as much as possible WITHOUT putting the site, the members, the mod or the staff at risk. Given the sheer amount of work they have already put in and the amount they still put in everyday, you would think people would cut them some slack at the very least. Obviously it's too much to ask for them to be civil or support them, but it's not hard to at least cut them some slack....
meanwhile smaller creators like Teenx is not allowed with girls that are not prepubescent and don't break rule7, and if he does, how come much younger girls with not even developed chests are allowed that are clear as day prepubescent.
First, again it is your opinion that it doesn't break rule 7, if you want his stuff up so badly feel free to start your own website.
Second, and again, if you see questionable content report it... it's not hard, just click the report link at the bottom left of the post.
I dont want neither of them to get banned but if you ban creators like Teenx that have older models and clearly not prepubescent girls then how come you guys dont enforce rule7 on clearly prepubescent content?
Giving you the benefit of the doubt here and going to assume it's a translation issue, OP's current content has been banned NOT OP.
If OP wants his creations on F95, he can A) modify them to fit the rules then OPEN A TICKET and submit the content for review, B) host his banned content on another site and create new content that fits the rules.
Also as you keep bringing up rule 7 and it not being enforced, here is the link to the site rules so you can read them.
https://f95zone.to/threads/general-rules-updated-2024-06-04.5589/
How is this fair for other creators like Teenx?
How is it fair to the other members, 7,993,007 at last count, the other creators (non rule 7), the mods, the staff and the site, if creators join this site knowing the rules, seeing that there are
clear options / steps in place to stay within the rules and yet they still break them, putting EVERYONE else at risk?
How hard is it before posting, to read the rules, open a ticket, submit examples of their content and ask if it is allowed?
They didn't think of it? They didn't need to, it's mentioned in the rules.
Now I have a question for you, I have asked it to others who have made similar posts but no one seems to want to answer it.
Is it so hard to go to another website to get that stuff?
