Pr0man
Member
- Jul 23, 2017
- 408
- 825
First off: talking in favor of the dev isn't really a reason to get banned, but when people just create accounts with the sole reason to spam hard-to-verify information in threads, that's when the situation becomes muddled. No official channels of his have any postings regarding something that would constitute a remake publicly available - not the game website's news section, not the twitter (which it tells me doesn't exist), nor his patreon have any posts indicating a rework is in the making - which is the information most will have to work with. Then the version posted, as shown by redknights checksum comparision was basically the exact same, just renamed. Maybe that was an error on Zimons side, but at this point it's just hard to tell.Sorry to butt in, can I say one thing in favour of the dev without being banned?
In the talk, it is said that a starting version will be posted here as a base, which will be updated in succession with the remade parts, not wanted to give a new version that must first be given to the patreons. If the game is to be distributed via launcher, this seems a normal thing to me, as it is not accepted here. Then he made a second thread since you didn't accept the first one, and in that one he added new things especially for your complaints, this one: MEGA, It contains renderings redone in some asmedia events and additions towards the end. Little stuff, but normal since patreons have precedence and this was a basic version for the forum.
Wasn't it better to discuss it civilly from the start?
It is one of the reasons that there can't be much civil discussion about the logistics of something like a remake. When there's barely any info to base a discussion around, how is one supposed to take action? This isn't helped by Zimon ranting paranoiac nonsense as to how the F95 is out to get him and sabotage him every alternate step, especially when his fanbase goes at this with a crusader-like fervor and aren't interested in hearing the other side. From what I remember, this was even happening before the fiasco regarding the review manipulation occured. But when he then writes down page-long manifestos that ultimately convey nothing, but the facts he is trying to tell us keep changing around every other post, it's hard to keep track and actually keep a discussion running.
As an interesting side note, the reworked Asmedia scene is in one of the screens on that new thread, and I have to say - I'm not feeling it. The developer notes on that thread say it quite well: "The rendering method has changed, as renders go through Unity's postprocessing as the final stage" and it sure looks like he hit every post-processing option available to Unity. Spots look over- or underexposed and it just looks so blurred out and like a hazy mess. Sure, the previous version might have been of lower resolution, but at least it was crisp.