ename144
Engaged Member
- Sep 20, 2018
- 3,743
- 15,550
- 681
The problem is that, in this case, I don't see any glaring problems. Yes, the review was technically incorrect about the MC never being in any peril, but the peril only happens at the very end of the current build, 7 chapters in. It's entirely possible the reviewer never made it that far.The question is not so much about being deceitful intentionally or by ignorance, it's about the fact that what he says about the game in his review is incorrect and needs to be either corrected or deleted because of that.
Reviews are being policed on daily basis whether you decide to help policing them or not. Because there have always been people here who either haven't read the rules or ignore them intentionally and are posting reviews that are either useless, wrong or deceitful on purpose.
There are too few mods on this forum to read every review or keep an eye on every thread and keep the forum from turning into a chaotic shithole. Reporting system is there to let the mods know about the obvious problems that would be left unnoticed otherwise. Forget about childish attitude from school about "snitching to the teachers". This is about keeping some kind of order here.
We're an adult community. We're expected to be smarter than stupid kids.
If we don't help the staff, we lose the right to criticise them if the rating system is being abused or threads turn into shitholes because of trolling or spamming or flame wars.
More importantly to me, the reviewer is clear in his criteria: he(?) dislikes the game because the MC is never in any danger. Since this game isn't presented as, say, a gritty noir adventure, I don't find that particularly surprising. But the point is if you are the sort of player who craves a constant sense danger I can see why Chasing Sunsets might not appeal to you. To me that's an indication of a useful review - even if the specific criteria in question are wholly useless to me.
The rest of the review is likewise clear in its critiques. The reviewer doesn't like having only two LIs, is annoyed that the story forces the MC still to be in love with Jaye regardless of our choices, and feels the MC's backstory involves him holding an idiot ball. Those are clear, defensible positions that can give a prospective player some insight into what sort of game this is. Sure, I disagree with most of it and think it could do a better job making its points, but a review doesn't have to be perfect to be valid.
IMHO the review should be left as is - though if we can call attention to the mistake about peril and persuade the reviewer to edit the original review voluntarily that would be good.