Zulsmashing@ss
Active Member
- Jul 12, 2022
- 595
- 265
- 186
Think you missed the point, it doesn't matter if everyone on the planet "knows" its taken from the other work, the lack of credit shows the type of person this developer is, someone who doesn't care, so why should we support them? The difference is that they would actually gain support by being truthful instead of pretending to pass it off as their own work. Instead, now they generate a ton of negativity and bad will with the community, and are less likely to be encouraged or helped, or trusted. A simple call out on something so plainly obvious is all we are asking, and they failed to do that, the bare minimum, so why should we support them or encourage this type of behavior? Are you saying if it were someone else's work that is less known, that was blatantly ripped off with no acknowledgment, you would have an issue with it? Then, at what level of popularity of the stolen work is ok or not? My point is, why have that arbitrary line or distinction? Everyone should just give credit when credit is do and be called out for it when they don't.Are you seriously suggesting that the vast majority of potential players of this game don't know the original source material? Even if he credited Eva, what difference would it make? 'Our Red String' has one of the largest threads on this site, where hundreds of people spend a large part of their lives. So I don't think the Dev crediting Eva, is going to tell us, something we didn't already know. Maybe, it would have been the respectful thing to do, to acknowledge Eva's original contribution. But this omission doesn't stop most people knowing it anyway.
On this site it's almost the equivalent of someone making a game where the MC's are Romeo and Juliet, and trying to pass them off as their creation. Everyone knows who really created Cindy's character, so the omission makes very little difference. As I said, it would be the respectful thing to do, to mention Eva in the overview. But in the final analysis, the Cindy in this game, diverges from the Cindy in ORS, and it's clear she's going to become a totally different character from the one Eva is developing. So ultimately, I don't see any long term conflict. It's up to Eva to pursue this, if she's bothered in the slightest with it, and so far there's nothing to suggest that she is.Think you missed the point, it doesn't matter if everyone on the planet "knows" its taken from the other work, the lack of credit shows the type of person this developer is, someone who doesn't care, so why should we support them? The difference is that they would actually gain support by being truthful instead of pretending to pass it off as their own work. Instead, now they generate a ton of negativity and bad will with the community, and are less likely to be encouraged or helped, or trusted. A simple call out on something so plainly obvious is all we are asking, and they failed to do that, the bare minimum, so why should we support them or encourage this type of behavior? Are you saying if it were someone else's work that is less known, that was blatantly ripped off with no acknowledgment, you would have an issue with it? Then, at what level of popularity of the stolen work is ok or not? My point is, why have that arbitrary line or distinction? Everyone should just give credit when credit is do and be called out for it when they don't.
We are in a time now were the line between stolen works is getting more and more blurry with AI and art and videos and 3d models and so much more, but I feel there is still a solid line drawn in the sand at blatantly copy and pasting someones entire written work of stories, characters, worlds, etc. and pretending its yours.
I can see where you are coming from and agree with most of what you say, but just let your points stand on their own. There is no need to use a lawyer facade to add credentials to your argument.First of all, I am a lawyer and I like this kind of games because they show the great creativity of the human being when it comes to create stories and bring them to life. I just registered on this site and I'm really impressed with the hate this game generates, so I decided to make this post.
I have absolutely no problem that you take me as lying that I am a lawyer I have nothing to prove actually, I made a simple and crude explanation for those who have no legal training to understand it, I will not make an explanation with legal terminology or make a master class to make several points clear, we are not in a trial and I'm writing as a user about something that seems unfair, judge without knowing and criticize without being right, I hate injustice. And thanks for agreeing with me, by the way English is not my first language so I apologize if you don't think I write well.I can see where you are coming from and agree with most of what you say, but just let your points stand on their own. There is no need to use a lawyer facade to add credentials to your argument.
The way you write and the angle in which you approach the entire issue is so "unlawyer" like that anyone who has exposure dealing with either practising lawyers or in-house counsels will know you are not legally trained.
Your points are compelling enough, doing a flimsy lawyer impersonation does nothing but distract readers from what you are trying to impress upon.
To clarify, i believe when people talk about stolen art they refer to some of scene backgrounds which were literally taken from EK's game. Not to characters which are, as you note, "inspired by" but not outright copied.The art style is quite similar. But that does not imply that it is stolen.
You have better chance tomorrow as right now its for the top-tier Patreons only.Hero please for new version?
I hope today is it the day hero comeYou have better chance tomorrow as right now its for the top-tier Patreons only.