mr.AwesomeGameTaste

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2021
1,208
2,042
407
for the ones who have played college kings, would you say that its better than WVM? cant really decide which one to go for so any help would be appreciated
It depends what you like. I like CK models and renders better than WVM. Also the fact that Mc in WVM is this super human without any flaw and all the girls wants to hop on his dick right away bothers me as I like more realistic approach. However many people like this feel-good type of games that WVM represents,so I'd say play them both as they are quite enjoyable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guiltyveek

GamingBoy88

New Member
Feb 13, 2021
3
0
35
When she ask the MC about Chloe after his disagreement with Ryan, you has to say "She likes me", and not "I like her". That´s all. She will kiss the MC and her story will develop no matter the choices you make with the MC (as the rest of the girls in the game): at first she will be totally into the MC, she will chase him, and will have sex with him even if he don´t invite her to the dance party... then she will change her personality, I assume that because of the change of writer, and will become another Audrey: her interest in the MC will be only because the writer needs more sex scenes to spice up the game, but she will actually be more interested in other girls than in the MC, and at certain point she will side with Charli to scorn the MC. The character is kind of a trap to piss of the player that is into her route, right now.
I did select that option and got the kiss. Still no luck WITHOUT touching the other girls and taking her to homecoming -shrugs- :confused:
 
Jun 17, 2021
60
145
157
It depends what you like. I like CK models and renders better than WVM. Also the fact that Mc in WVM is this super human without any flaw and all the girls wants to hop on his dick right away bothers me as I like more realistic approach. However many people like this feel-good type of games that WVM represents,so I'd say play them both as they are quite enjoyable.
I was going to say the exact same thing. Love CK renders, but for me, it's quite obvious that WVM is better done taking about the whole game experience a VN should have.
 

224488

Newbie
Jul 21, 2021
99
371
73
Someone needs to send Charli the video of the dude that got punched out in the hall for talking shit to the MC. :p
Charli is gay. That means he has immunity to be an asshole. I don´t think the dev will include a scene in witch the MC gets at last fed up of that Charli and punches him in the face, as satisfying as it would be. It´s 2021. That would be homophobic aggression! :rolleyes:
 

AngelsAfterDark

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2021
1,199
2,295
320
This has notTE="Sekunda, post: 6307051, member: 3957437"]
Charli is gay. That means he has immunity to be an asshole. I don´t think the dev will include a scene in witch the MC gets at last fed up of that Charli and punches him in the face, as satisfying as it would be. It´s 2021. That would be homophobic aggression! :rolleyes:
[/QUOTE]
This
Charli is gay. That means he has immunity to be an asshole. I don´t think the dev will include a scene in witch the MC gets at last fed up of that Charli and punches him in the face, as satisfying as it would be. It´s 2021. That would be homophobic aggression! :rolleyes:
MCs dislike for Charli has nothing to do with his sexuality and I disagree, just because ur gay or lesbian don't mean u can get away with acting like an asshole, so punching a gay or lesbian person is no different than punching a straight person unless if it's for bigotry reasons
 

224488

Newbie
Jul 21, 2021
99
371
73
This has notTE="Sekunda, post: 6307051, member: 3957437"]
Charli is gay. That means he has immunity to be an asshole. I don´t think the dev will include a scene in witch the MC gets at last fed up of that Charli and punches him in the face, as satisfying as it would be. It´s 2021. That would be homophobic aggression! :rolleyes:
This

MCs dislike for Charli has nothing to do with his sexuality and I disagree, just because ur gay or lesbian don't mean u can get away with acting like an asshole, so punching a gay or lesbian person is no different than punching a straight person unless if it's for bigotry reasons
[/QUOTE]
Agree, but that's the way postmodern political correctness works. It doesn´t matter that Charli (or any person from a minority in real life) is an asshole. It matters that the persons is gay or belongs to any other minority (even women are now minorities), so is a victim by nature and can't be touched. Specially not by a straight white man (the post-modern anti-christ)

I don´t know if the dev is going to have the "guts" to break that not written rule in this game, but I bet not.
 

zomkung

Member
Sep 28, 2017
408
609
318
Steve lost nearly 1000 patrons in the new month LOL, confirmed that his sudden growth in July was only bc nobody uploaded the link to f95 right away as it was before.
?

All of them losing their patreons at the beginning of the month. Which is normal

 

rahkshi01

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
1,924
1,827
348
Been a while since I checked this one but I heard somethings about some changes? Something about the MC's old girlfriend and the cheating. Did it get changed or something? I see some people say it was a girl she cheated with is that true?
 

Alfius

Engaged Member
Modder
Sep 30, 2017
2,689
5,651
755
for the ones who have played college kings, would you say that its better than WVM? cant really decide which one to go for so any help would be appreciated
Personally, I could not get into WVM. I played it about a year ago and it just got boring and predictable very quickly. You meet a new girls, she think you are the bomb and viola, you can have sex with her. Rinse... repeat.

A lot of people likes it though and if you are into harem games, maybe it's the one for you.

College Kings are more my type of game. Fooling around with as many girls as you can get away with, but not without repercussions. Yes, I like getting with all the girls in a game, but WVM was just too much. You have a GF, you cheat on her... no problem, she does not mind at all. "Sleep around as much as you want baby".... just did not do it for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PanchoPistolas33

Avaron1974

Resident Lesbian
Aug 22, 2018
28,080
96,988
1,021
Logic 103... She indicated not being happy and or things being bad between them prior to her cheating and it can be assumed that, at the very least, they both had a hand in the state of that relationship. She questioned whether or not the MC ever loved her in the first place, which indicates that on some level, she questions the MC's motives. You might try to claim I am ignoring the fact that she tries to get back with the main character, but the reality is you're ignoring all of the above JUST because she tries to get back with MC as if no one ever does things even if they're not 100% sure. Your words imply that people don't go back and forth on their feelings and or why... especially college aged people. It's as if you've never heard of someone thinking they're sure about something, but then they have a talk with someone and realize that maybe their wrong.

Charli: "If he hurt you so badly, why do you keep wanting him back?"
Emily: "I don't know. I love him. I mean our relationship wasn't all bad you know? I just... He used to hold me at night and I think about how he smelled I miss him."
Charli: "That doesn't sound like love. It sounds more like familiarity or maybe even obsession. Neither of which seems healthy or a good reason to pursue someone."

Now right or not, it would be VERY realistic if she considered his words and that's without looking at the various factors beyond her cheating. The key thing here being "right or not" as whether it's accurate or not has nothing to do with whether or not someone believes something.
My issue with the whole Emily thing if you went her route is thus...

They obviously had issues the first time round that led to the big betrayal etc..

MC forgives said betrayal, misses the girl, looks to get back together and attempt to make it work this time... only for someone else to get involved (again though with less sex this time) and for things to fall apart a second time.

So my question is this, if the relationship has gone nowhere and fallen apart so easily twice now, why would the MC go for a third time?

I haven't argued against the whole shit talk thing, devs game they can do what they want with it, i'm just struggling with the reasoning behind making one of the main love interests so unlikeable and have her be part of the main reason it keeps falling apart.

I can't be the only one now that will never have anything to do with her again.

At first it was all good. The big redemption story of how 2 lovers came back together to find love but it didn't go that way and i'm not one for trying to fix something that keeps breaking. To me that's an obvious sign it aint meant to be and it's time to move on.

I just don't get the thinking behind it. It's like the devs don't want people to like her.
 
3.20 star(s) 213 Votes