Recommending Complete Netorase & Sharing Games Master List

5.00 star(s) 1 Vote

zandalari

Member
May 4, 2019
438
2,235
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
While it's great that you're willing to try, is there a reason to do it? As the author you sway in a particular direction and there's nothing wrong with it. While I and some others might not particularly enjoy it, there's no need to change the narrative. Write and make things you are passionate about. If it's NTR, so be it. I'm not really a fan of seeing games change narrative just to please people, even if the change would theoretically be my way. Stick to your vision and you're fine as is.
 

sagerock820

Active Member
Nov 5, 2023
950
1,710
I just downloaded that one but haven't played yet. I started and finished the content that I want to see with Wifey's Dilema, and that one is next on my agenda.
It just had a big update and I thought it was great on the sharing side.
 

Logan1377

Active Member
Feb 13, 2023
640
902
It just had a big update and I thought it was great on the sharing side.
Yeah, literally the day after someone recommended it to me, the update dropped. I'm guessing he knew that, following the game. I played the most friendly, agreeable share not cheat route and thought it had some good content, though the MC is still too passive for my taste, and the writing is a little off in a few spots. The MC basically throws her at the other guys, brining up the topic of sharing on his own almost out of nowhere, while I think that it would be a lot better if it happened more organically and he moreso agreed to it and let it happen.

The game unfortunately also had frequent rollback errors during every single sharing scene the entire game that i had to work past, and I was wondering if that was a problem that others had as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiz1247

Unreal434

Member
Sep 23, 2018
125
321
So I´ve got few hours in the original old version of Wicked Rouge after seeing a few people talking here about it couple of moths ago.
But guys there is still no sharing/swinging at all. There are only some minor differences between the old and the newer "Refine" version.

The girls are still basically segregated into two groups. There are four courtesans that you fuck to upgrade and they have some scenes but thats it no romance at all.
And then there are 2-3 LIs but you can´t send them to entertain the guests.

I mean the concept is cool but in my book both versions have no content outside of vanilla unlike something like Sluttown USA that doesn´t have proper tags but there is still sharing content.

fudeyo_threesome.png
 

sagerock820

Active Member
Nov 5, 2023
950
1,710
Yeah, literally the day after someone recommended it to me, the update dropped. I'm guessing he knew that, following the game. I played the most friendly, agreeable share not cheat route and thought it had some good content, though the MC is still too passive for my taste, and the writing is a little off in a few spots. The MC basically throws her at the other guys, brining up the topic of sharing on his own almost out of nowhere, while I think that it would be a lot better if it happened more organically and he moreso agreed to it and let it happen.

The game unfortunately also had frequent rollback errors during every single sharing scene the entire game that i had to work past, and I was wondering if that was a problem that others had as well.
Yeah, I agree he is a little on the passive side. The one thing I do like, that not all sharing games do is, they agreed he will always be there when she has sex whether he participates or not. It did kind of take off quickly once they started their relationship, I agree. I don't remember coming across rollback errors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Logan1377

Pr0GamerJohnny

Forum Fanatic
Sep 7, 2022
5,417
7,774
It just had a big update and I thought it was great on the sharing side.
I simply couldn't get over the unsightly (IMO) characters. Maybe enjoying it requires a strong milf fetish or something.
So I´ve got few hours in the original old version of Wicked Rouge after seeing a few people talking here about it couple of moths ago.
But guys there is still no sharing/swinging at all. There are only some minor differences between the old and the newer "Refine" version.

The girls are still basically segregated into two groups. There are four courtesans that you fuck to upgrade and they have some scenes but thats it no romance at all.
And then there are 2-3 LIs but you can´t send them to entertain the guests.

I mean the concept is cool but in my book both versions have no content outside of vanilla unlike something like Sluttown USA that doesn´t have proper tags but there is still sharing content.

View attachment 3375644
I still have love for Wicked Rouge (original, not the braindead remake) - because while everything you said is correct and it fails as a "sharing game", it's still one of the most enjoyable rpgm mechanical games. The combat in WR, many rpgm snoozefests could take a lesson from. And early on the economic side is somewhat difficult. But yeah, you pretty much gotta use your imagination that sakura or whatever her name is is your girlfriend, and the game deliberately steers you away from those characters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unreal434

Logan1377

Active Member
Feb 13, 2023
640
902
Yeah, I agree he is a little on the passive side. The one thing I do like, that not all sharing games do is, they agreed he will always be there when she has sex whether he participates or not. It did kind of take off quickly once they started their relationship, I agree. I don't remember coming across rollback errors.
Someone else said that the game is basically mostly focused on the cheating/cuck paths, and that the sharing is more throwing a bone to those of us who prefer that. It does feel pretty strongly written that way. I can't complain and I'm interested to see what happens next.

Still, I'm far more interested in a game where the MC is a more confident, assertive guy who's out there meeting women and seducing them, but who's also open to sharing and swinging, and that middle path feels very ignored. It seems people either never want any man other than the MC to ever have sex, or they want one where he's a total pushover and watches as his wife or girlfriend is fucked by others and potentially taken from him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiz1247

sagerock820

Active Member
Nov 5, 2023
950
1,710
Someone else said that the game is basically mostly focused on the cheating/cuck paths, and that the sharing is more throwing a bone to those of us who prefer that. It does feel pretty strongly written that way. I can't complain and I'm interested to see what happens next.

Still, I'm far more interested in a game where the MC is a more confident, assertive guy who's out there meeting women and seducing them, but who's also open to sharing and swinging, and that middle path feels very ignored. It seems people either never want any man other than the MC to ever have sex, or they want one where he's a total pushover and watches as his wife or girlfriend is fucked by others and potentially taken from him.
Have you tried Exciting Games? I think it's one of the best sharing one's out there.
 

Logan1377

Active Member
Feb 13, 2023
640
902
Have you tried Exciting Games? I think it's one of the best sharing one's out there.
I tried it a long time ago, and didn't get very far into it. Like Wifey's Dilema, my memory is that the MC was really passive and just kinda went along with things, but I could be remembering it wrong, and updates might have been made that added and changed things since then of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiz1247

Logan1377

Active Member
Feb 13, 2023
640
902
On another note, is it my imagination, or do most of the games that involve sharing seem to have a female lead who's very thin and small chested? Obviously that's a choice for the dev to make, but as a guy who strongly prefers curvy women, its something that can make me a lot less interested.
 

sagerock820

Active Member
Nov 5, 2023
950
1,710
On another note, is it my imagination, or do most of the games that involve sharing seem to have a female lead who's very thin and small chested? Obviously that's a choice for the dev to make, but as a guy who strongly prefers curvy women, its something that can make me a lot less interested.
I like both body types. I just don't like when someone gives LIs oversized balloon boobs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hans851 and Fiz1247

Logan1377

Active Member
Feb 13, 2023
640
902
I like both body types. I just don't like when someone gives LIs oversized balloon boobs.
It depends on her frame and how they're shaped. I don't like super thin women with comical, artificial looking tits, IRL or in games. But I do strongly prefer ones with a thicker hourglass body and really big naturals, to balance wide hips and a big ass.

Smaller boobs can be ok if the girl has a great bottom half, but I'm not into really thin women who are less shapely at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChiefMasterson

Gesvae

Newbie
Jul 22, 2018
65
66
Someone else said that the game is basically mostly focused on the cheating/cuck paths, and that the sharing is more throwing a bone to those of us who prefer that. It does feel pretty strongly written that way. I can't complain and I'm interested to see what happens next.

Still, I'm far more interested in a game where the MC is a more confident, assertive guy who's out there meeting women and seducing them, but who's also open to sharing and swinging, and that middle path feels very ignored. It seems people either never want any man other than the MC to ever have sex, or they want one where he's a total pushover and watches as his wife or girlfriend is fucked by others and potentially taken from him.
Love & Vice is that to a tee, assertive MC who seduces and occasionally shares women. The only trouble is that it’s a HTML Real Porn game and the netorase content doesn’t start until the late game.
If those are dealbreakers for you the creator is also making a 3d Ren’py game, but it’s very early in development.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiz1247 and hadbla
5.00 star(s) 1 Vote