Damn, wish futa was toggleable on/off for content. Guess I'll have to revert saves if I get something unexpected?
You can turn off the cheating part for the foxes once you enter their den after completing their related quest even then the cheating is not with all foxes just the shrine maiden sisters and some voeuyr with irrelavant background characters, there's no affinity system just complete the related quest and you'll get their scenes, lore wise they'll fuck anything because it's how they feed they're soul vampires and suck your energy through sex.
No. The only thing that suffers almost always is you pride, as a reader. No in game impact on anything at all whatsoever.
No, they just....thing in itself written by somebody with, lets say, interesting mind.
I mean, Orgy aside it also changes nearly all of her interactions.
And trading, and mercantilism, and as part of negotiation and charity.
Have you defeated Alissa at the winter city yet? The conclusion of bewitched is gated behind that no matter how long you wait.
So stay away from the foxes, gotcha.
You have given me all the reason to shame you --shame on you!
Most of the writers have the courtesy to warn the player if the character is a futa. It's usually bolded text near the end of their descriptions somewhere along the lines of "She has a huge fuckin' bulge in her pants yo". The character art can also be a dead giveaway. The same applies to traps and gay content.
For me it made me hate them more.
I want to see them try to get away to with what a corrupt character can do Phylla, Lottie, and Amily. You're straight up a physically and emotionally abusive boyfriend to the former two, and you straight up rape the latter into corruption like a demon. Their discord would have a heart attack. They'd never do it because their slave to Patreon, but just food for thought. Kind of wondering if one of the most lambasted scenes from the first game would be lauded and praised for having characters not revolve around the PC in their discord though? They deplore PC centric characters, but that scene punishes you for being Cait and Brint, so they'd probably be conflicted.
I don't get it with these people, they are okay with npcs doing horrible shit to the characters they created but abhor the idea of being given the choice to do the same thing back in an rpg. Can't they simply choose not to do it if they don't want to? That's the logic they'd use on us if we don't like content they like. Anyone here with a psychology degree or something can explain this please?
Hmm yes I've been studying this for ages and I believe it's called uh.*shuffle through book pages* let's see here.....AH HA yes Mental Retardation this is quite prevalent with the many "authors" of Coc 2 but researchers have found it's most prevalent in this Observer fellow.
One writer loves futas (specifically dominant ones), as well as cuckold and sharing fetishes. This leads to some amount of repetitiveness among characters (almost every futa is a dom with similar personality and sex scenes), as well as fetish scenes which put off a lot of people. He also tends to act as a catalyst for the following two writers.
Ok so let me get this straight.3 writers.One of them decides to spam his generic fetish characters again and again without making them different and unique to stand out and feel like actual people and not just "horny dommy mommy" coomer bait.
Oh man, there's so many different complaints to simplify. I'll try and tldr the main ones: Because the game has a bunch of different writers, the MC is written extremely inconsistently which can really hurt immersion. A lot of times, there are characters that can "hard-dom" you and treat you like shit, but the very idea of you doing that to NPCs seems to horrify them, as your PC rarely gets to be more than gentle dom.
