Create and Fuck your AI Cum Slut -70% Summer Sale
x

Others Corruption of Champions II [v0.8.1] [Savin/Salamander Studios]

2.90 star(s) 126 Votes
Discussion Reviews (126)
W

Walk Cycle

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2018
1,047
3,061
MoneyMan181 said:
Now that I think about it, the devs are really boring with how they handle companions. The fact that they're always with you could lead to some great fetish material but that's never taken advantage of. For example: Imagine a mommy/daddy-dom that restricts the things you can do based on how much you go along with their shit. Like maybe you can't use Naptha/Leananstones because they don't want their "precious baby" hurting themselves or not being able to do corruption choices because "their baby would never do such a thing". Or maybe vice versa and you're the one in that role. Just something that can be done only because they're a follower would be nice.
Click to expand...
I was expecting that they'll do something like that when I found out that they'll be stricter in implementing companions. Like being collared by a dommy companion or restricting choices as you said to hammer in the D/s dynamic. I'm willing to trudge through the shitty combat mechanics and the forced companion system if I'll be able to make an all-domme party and be their little elvish healslut, but all we get are either threesome scenes or the champion just watching their companions have sex.
 
D

destroyerofassholes

Well-Known Member
Oct 23, 2019
1,709
5,813
MoneyMan181 said:
So have some professionalism and sort that shit out. Like it or not, Berwyn had a lot of fans and fulfilled a good niche so to just tossing the character away is fucking stupid. Would it really have been so hard to say:
"Look, I know we've had some issues before but that's in the past. You can work on Berwyn under (x) conditions, and if you don't keep up with that, I'm getting someone else to work on your character."

Although maybe he did do something along those lines, but I have my doubts about that. Savin doesn't seem mature enough to take a step back and compromise in such a way.

I've said it once and I'll say it again, it's really fucking weird how little variety is actually in these games. Like you'd think with games where the community's content can make it into the game that there would be a lot of different fetishes and shit.

Nope, all we get are horse cock futas, impregnation, dom/sub shit, and... that's it. Add voyeurism/threesomes to this game. Like there's one fucking footjob scene in all 3 of these games combined, that's fucking insane considering how many foot weirdos are out there and how tame it could be.

Now that I think about it, the devs are really boring with how they handle companions. The fact that they're always with you could lead to some great fetish material but that's never taken advantage of. For example: Imagine a mommy/daddy-dom that restricts the things you can do based on how much you go along with their shit. Like maybe you can't use Naptha/Leananstones because they don't want their "precious baby" hurting themselves or not being able to do corruption choices because "their baby would never do such a thing". Or maybe vice versa and you're the one in that role. Just something that can be done only because they're a follower would be nice.

Granted it wouldn't really be feasible to have all companions have something like that, but it's kind of a let down none of them truly take advantage of companion status. Pretty much all of them could work as regular NPCs. There really should be more options for kinky stuff outside of sex.
Click to expand...
Wsan has apparently said a few times that despite all of Savin's antics he is an okay boss. I have my doubts about that since he regularly lets his staff duke it out on Discord publicly, and even joins himself. But so says the writer that is pretty well beloved here.

And Hugs's twitter...well...he isn't exactly in a healthy state of mind. Not sure if he ever was.

In this particular case, at least for the kicking out of Hugs, I'm inclined towards being more neutral. We don't have all the information to make a judgement out of it.

But yeah the replacement content by B was so absolutely ass and such a character assassination that I wonder if B even bothered to play through the actual content of Berry already in the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mav3rick88, Runufiv, Jollira and 12 others
D

Deleted member 1660801

Member
Sep 21, 2019
268
425
destroyerofassholes said:
Wsan has apparently said a few times that despite all of Savin's antics he is an okay boss. I have my doubts about that since he regularly lets his staff duke it out on Discord publicly, and even joins himself. But so says the writer that is pretty well beloved here.

And Hugs's twitter...well...he isn't exactly in a healthy state of mind. Not sure if he ever was.

In this particular case, at least for the kicking out of Hugs, I'm inclined towards being more neutral. We don't have all the information to make a judgement out of it.

But yeah the replacement content by B was so absolutely ass and such a character assassination that I wonder if B even bothered to play through the actual content of Berry already in the game.
Click to expand...
Well said, I should have included this information in my previous post.
 
W

Walk Cycle

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2018
1,047
3,061
destroyerofassholes said:
But yeah the replacement content by B was so absolutely ass and such a character assassination that I wonder if B even bothered to play through the actual content of Berry already in the game.
Click to expand...
I mean B wrote Berry's cock worship bad end when Hugs was still active so it's safe to say he has an idea about the character.
 
MoneyMan181

MoneyMan181

Active Member
Sep 6, 2019
823
6,940
Kroenen12 said:
View attachment 2191927
View attachment 2191908
an asexual character? in a porn game? really?
View attachment 2191928
Click to expand...
If the character isn't sexable and it's for reasons other than, "they're asexual" I'm pretty fine with it if they just slap the label on a character. Doesn't really mean anything to me either way. If the character does have sex scenes, then it's just brain damage.

Gotta admit though, the wording in that second screenshot is COMPLETE dogshit. Legit don't think it could be worse lmao.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted member 77250, Thisguy2, Runufiv and 5 others
Kroenen12

Kroenen12

Member
May 25, 2020
454
2,620
MoneyMan181 said:
If the character isn't sexable and it's for reasons other than, "they're asexual" I'm pretty fine with it if they just slap the label on a character. Doesn't really mean anything to me either way. If the character does have sex scenes, then it's just brain damage.

Gotta admit though, the wording in that second screenshot is COMPLETE dogshit. Legit don't think it could be worse lmao.
Click to expand...
ok this just got dumber :KEK:
Screenshot_2.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: yuzuyo, KloneZone and Fiz1247
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
2.90 star(s) 126 Votes