No? I said we should strive to please everyone, yes. That doesn't mean bend over backwards and be fine with people complaining about having more options.
OK, so we should strive to please everyone when they complain about having two options they don't like, but when they complain about not liking
three offered options, that's where we draw the line because striving further would be bending over backwards. Got it.
It's utterly ridiculous to say my alternatives would cause more annoyance than what currently exists.
At the risk of going in circles, i've already pointed out how it'd be problematic. To which you'd only offer "well then that's people's problem" and SARCASTIC CAPS.
Forgive me if i don't think my point was quite as ridiculous as you're now trying to make it. At least, not with that sort of (lack of) counterpoint.
Are you going to bring up the fact that I also said Etheryn as a route would've made perfect sense and also fix this issue?
No, i'm not? I don't know what makes you think adding third NPC to choose from would be a fix here, but at least it doesn't have the problem your other suggestion had, so there was no need for me to say anything about it.
No, and even if you did, you would have said people would be annoyed at having to choose between characters even though that is already a problem within the quest itself. Or any other number of excuses why it couldn't be done.
See, and that's why propping up straw men isn't a good idea. Because when the other person says something different than what you said they would, you kind of wind up with an egg on your face.