Others Corruption of Champions II [v0.8.17] [Savin/Salamander Studios]

2.90 star(s) 133 Votes
Discussion Reviews (133)
mrttao

mrttao

Forum Fanatic
Jun 11, 2021
4,513
7,629
524
Tau_Iota said:
Regardless of your feelings about the DSM-5, it remains the foremost important tool available in the field of psychology. It is far from perfect, but that is why it has multiple iterations. As understanding of the human psyche grows, so does the DSM. Let me guess, you also believe that fluoride is put in the water because Stalin and Hitler did because they believed it would make prisoners more docile?

Also, battered spouse syndrome is not recognized by the DSM. It's labeled as PTSD.
Click to expand...
1. Appeal to authority fallacy, ad hominem fallacy, appeal to ridicule fallacy. A+ response.

2. As for the authority you are appealing to.. the DSM is the latest set of "official" definitions according to the APA, the psychiatric association of the united states of america.
china has their own differing definitions, russia has their own differing definitions, india has their own differing definitions. etc.
None of them use the DSM which is USA thing.

3. Furthermore, the reason your specified authority does not list it, is not because they do not think it exists.
But because they are having an argument on how to classify it
wikipedia said:
The
You must be registered to see the links
is widely used as the "classification system for psychological disorders" by the
You must be registered to see the links
.
You must be registered to see the links
Stockholm syndrome has not historically appeared in the manual, as many believe it falls under
You must be registered to see the links
or
You must be registered to see the links
(PTSD) and there is no consensus about the correct clarification. In addition, there is no extensive body of research or consensus to help solve the argument,
You must be registered to see the links
although before the fifth edition (DSM 5) was released, Stockholm syndrome was under consideration to be included under 'Disorders of Extreme Stress, Not Otherwise Specified'.
You must be registered to see the links
The work was updated in 2013, but Stockholm syndrome was not present.
You must be registered to see the links
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: Mirolyub and silentangel
arls120

arls120

Member
Sep 12, 2020
388
496
162
I question when they think of adding some content for some male partner at this point even content from berwyn I accept and I'm almost about to cross the line and beg that I even need to write it tobs the content
 
I

icecreamman99

Member
Mar 1, 2018
255
703
238
Kas is a evil bitch that might might like you despite conflicting "lore" but she she still an evil bitch.
For me evil bitches get broken in or in half
also where etheryn sister at?
 
  • Like
Reactions: namelessone22
M0nte

M0nte

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2020
1,482
3,209
428
arls120 said:
I question when they think of adding some content for some male partner at this point even content from berwyn I accept and I'm almost about to cross the line and beg that I even need to write it tobs the content
Click to expand...
Not sure if there is anything more besides upcoming Berwyn expansion and Jstar Kitsune, but I am currently working on male NPC. Close to 6000 words in, 1/3 done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amnelis, silentangel, fetishgirl and 3 others
Raf-Raf

Raf-Raf

Conversation Conqueror
Dec 4, 2019
6,600
8,662
729
MoneyMan181 said:
You guys are over here talking about whether Kas can actually love and I'm just here wondering why the Dullahan doesn't have a stealth sex scene where she blows you under an inn table by using just her head.
:WeSmart:
Click to expand...
They probably haven't experienced removing their own body parts yet.
 
DoctorSargePep

DoctorSargePep

Member
Sep 20, 2018
129
75
48
MoneyMan181 said:
You guys are over here talking about whether Kas can actually love and I'm just here wondering why the Dullahan doesn't have a stealth sex scene where she blows you under an inn table by using just her head.
:WeSmart:
Click to expand...
I don't think Atugia is into oral,but i do think she's into getting bang while she watches and/or her head is separated from her body
fetishgirl said:
Interesting take do you think this could happen to future party members later?
Click to expand...
clothing wise I don't they have anything like that planned,but there is suppose to be Berwyn transformed into girl/lady/woman content in the future
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kroenen12 and fetishgirl
B

Bloep

Member
Sep 2, 2020
310
1,057
299
silentangel said:
You must be registered to see the links

Did everyone forget about the bad end in this quest? Regardless how of "canon" bad ends are supposed to be it feels a bit silly to say this isn't compelling evidence. I mean she just flat out admits to it here.
Click to expand...
Damn, TOBS actually wrote something worthwhile for once.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: silentangel and mrttao
M

muschi26

Engaged Member
Jun 22, 2019
3,187
4,973
427
OK but surely "bad ends aren't canon" means that the events of bad ends don't and won't impact the game world. What it doesn't mean (or at least shouldn't mean) is that characterization gets thrown out the window, or that anything can happen and it doesn't matter.

E.g. a bad end can show Hawkthorne getting destroyed, but it won't stick past the game-over screen: Hawkthorne being destroyed is not canon. However, you couldn't have Master Chief from Halo show up in a bad end, or you wouldn't suddenly see Cait randomly renounce her oath and swear monogamy to the PC (unless she got mind-controlled or something), because those things don't make sense with regards to the rules of the world, or the characterization of Cait. Even in a non-canonical bad end, those examples would just be nonsensical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fikedever, MaxVaron, silentangel and 9 others
S

Skandranon

Well-Known Member
Nov 28, 2016
1,548
3,694
455
muschi26 said:
OK but surely "bad ends aren't canon" means that the events of bad ends don't and won't impact the game world. What it doesn't mean (or at least shouldn't mean) is that characterization gets thrown out the window, or that anything can happen and it doesn't matter.

E.g. a bad end can show Hawkthorne getting destroyed, but it won't stick past the game-over screen: Hawkthorne being destroyed is not canon. However, you couldn't have Master Chief from Halo show up in a bad end, or you wouldn't suddenly see Cait randomly renounce her oath and swear monogamy to the PC (unless she got mind-controlled or something), because those things don't make sense with regards to the rules of the world, or the characterization of Cait. Even in a non-canonical bad end, those examples would just be nonsensical.
Click to expand...
There's literally a bad end where your character somehow ends up being the MC from Skyrim in the wagon at the beginning of the game.

They totally will do those kinds of things.
 
W

Wrynn13

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2018
1,026
3,753
426
Because if they are going to troll the player with things that are cannon of course they are going to troll the player even harder with things that aren't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
2.90 star(s) 133 Votes