VN Ren'Py Cursed Affection [Ep. 8] [Daniels K]

4.00 star(s) 16 Votes

pedersilver5

Newbie
Jan 20, 2025
29
7
Ask chatgpt my friend :


It’s mostly a myth. In movies, shooting a can of gasoline makes it explode in a huge fireball, but in reality, it’s much harder to ignite gasoline that way. Here’s why:


  1. Bullets Alone Don’t Spark Enough – Most bullets just punch a hole through the can. Regular lead or copper bullets don’t produce enough sparks or heat to ignite gasoline.
  2. Gasoline Needs the Right Conditions to Ignite – Liquid gasoline doesn’t burn; it’s the vapors that are flammable. Even if a bullet creates a spark, there’s no guarantee there will be enough vapor mixed with oxygen at the right concentration to ignite.
It's the vapors that ignite, having been trained to fight Jet aircraft fires, oil fires, kerosene fires, wood, paper, .... I know what I am talking about. You think a police agency doesn't have incendiary rounds?
 
May 26, 2023
75
43
It's the vapors that ignite, having been trained to fight Jet aircraft fires, oil fires, kerosene fires, wood, paper, .... I know what I am talking about. You think a police agency doesn't have incendiary rounds?
They clearly state that all that's left is a rifle and a hand gun. And the guys going on the roof aren't even police. Apparently they don't have incendiary rounds or nukes or anything else.

Let's just say DK has a long and well established history of a smooth takeoff but then fails to stick the landing. In fact I personally don't rate any of his landings as anything but crash landings.
I asked this question before and I'll keep asking it, out of curiosity, how would you do it better? Or, what is a better way of doing it? Provide us with an example for whatever crash landing ending you think would be better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marvoch

Cabin Fever

Engaged Member
Nov 23, 2018
3,533
5,718
I asked this question before and I'll keep asking it, out of curiosity, how would you do it better? Or, what is a better way of doing it? Provide us with an example for whatever crash landing ending you think would be better.
Countless people have detailed how DK is no good at storytelling. Why don't you actually spend some time reading the threads in this and previous DK games instead of asking yet again? We are not your mom. We are not responsible for spoon-feeding you all the answers.
 
May 26, 2023
75
43
Countless people have detailed how DK is no good at storytelling. Why don't you actually spend some time reading the threads in this and previous DK games instead of asking yet again? We are not your mom. We are not responsible for spoon-feeding you all the answers.
In other words, you say something and we're supposed to believe you because you said it. And why would I have to read all the threads when I can make up my own mind about things from experience. I'm not jumping on the sheep wagon that takes for granted whatever other sheeps say before it. You keep claiming this shit and that shit without bringing any substance or proof to what you're saying, except that "others said it before so it must be true". And why do you refer to yourself as "we", what's up with that?

I didn't ask for all the answers, I asked for one answer, I asked for you to back up your empty words with some substance and you keep avoiding it time and time again. Giving an explanation about something that you said and you stick by, isn't spoon feeding, it's called being a normal human with a brain.

You know how you sounded right now? Like this :

- How old are you? (asks normal human with a brain)
- Like wtf, do I need to spoon feed you all the answers? Ask my friends, my family, like wtf do I have to explain myself? (says the we guy)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marvoch

Cabin Fever

Engaged Member
Nov 23, 2018
3,533
5,718
In other words, you say something and we're supposed to believe you because you said it. And why would I have to read all the threads when I can make up my own mind about things from experience. I'm not jumping on the sheep wagon that takes for granted whatever other sheeps say before it. You keep claiming this shit and that shit without bringing any substance or proof to what you're saying, except that "others said it before so it must be true". And why do you refer to yourself as "we", what's up with that?

I didn't ask for all the answers, I asked for one answer, I asked for you to back up your empty words with some substance and you keep avoiding it time and time again. Giving an explanation about something that you said and you stick by, isn't spoon feeding, it's called being a normal human with a brain.

You know how you sounded right now? Like this :

- How old are you? (asks normal human with a brain)
- Like wtf, do I need to spoon feed you all the answers? Ask my friends, my family, like wtf do I have to explain myself? (says the we guy)
Why would you read all the threads? Because the answers that you have asked for repeatedly (according to your own words) , are already presented there in broad daylight for anyone to see for many years.

Someone asked if DK struggles to wrap up his game and I provided my opinion, which happens to be widely shared among people what have played all of DK's games for all these years. However, nowhere did I say it's the only valid opinion.

I do not need to prove anything, nor am I obligated to satisfy your personal curiosity by providing an example of how I can do it better.

But since you started this argument, if it's so important to prove something and provide an example, the onus is on YOU to prove that I'm wrong and provide an example.

And to play your game, you know how you sounded right now? Like this :

- Marvoch - I have a SUBJECTIVE question (asks normal human with a brain)
- Me - Here's a SUBJECTIVE answer (answers normal human with a brain)
- You - Prove it (interjects passive aggressive human that doesn't agree with a well known common opinion)
- Me - Like wtf, it's a widely held and documented opinion, go take a look you lazy ass, we don't spoon feed around here (answers annoyed human being put off by the passive aggressiveness)
- You - No, it's not up to me to go take a look and learn for myself, you must satisfy my personal curiosity and convince me and prove your opinion is right or you are a brainless sheep on a sheep wagon (doubles down on passive aggressiveness with gaslighting)
 
Last edited:
May 26, 2023
75
43
Why would you read all the threads? Because the answers that you have asked for repeatedly (according to your own words) , are already presented there in broad daylight for anyone to see for many years.

Someone asked if DK struggles to wrap up his game and I provided my opinion, which happens to be widely shared among people what have played all of DK's games for all these years. However, nowhere did I say it's the only valid opinion.

I do not need to prove anything, nor am I obligated to satisfy your personal curiosity by providing an example of how I can do it better.

But since you started this argument, if it's so important to prove something and provide an example, the onus is on YOU to prove that I'm wrong and provide an example.

And to play your game, you know how you sounded right now? Like this :

- Marvoch - I have a SUBJECTIVE question (asks normal human with a brain)
- Me - Here's a SUBJECTIVE answer (answers normal human with a brain)
- You - Prove it (interjects passive aggressive human that doesn't agree with a well known common opinion)
- Me - Like wtf, it's a widely held and documented opinion, go take a look you lazy ass, we don't spoon feed around here (answers annoyed human being put off by the passive aggressiveness)
- You - No, it's not up to me to go take a look and learn for myself, you must satisfy my personal curiosity and convince me and prove your opinion is right or you are a brainless sheep on a sheep wagon (doubles down on passive aggressiveness with gaslighting)
Clearly I'm not getting anywhere here with you, instead of diving deeper into this black hole let's leave it as it is. The bottom line is that you made a statement and I asked for clarification (you don't have to answer, nobody is making you but expect to be called out when bullshiting), if you don't want to be asked questions or people replying to your posts, refrain from posting at all as it solves the problem. I will see you the next time you act like you know better so we can fire it up again, maybe you'll surprise me and actually come up with an answer next time:)

By the way, the "game of how you sound" that you posted, it's off by a long shot, read the posts again and see for yourself that I literally said 'Why would I have to read all the threads when I can make up my own mind about things from experience' :)
 

Cabin Fever

Engaged Member
Nov 23, 2018
3,533
5,718
Clearly I'm not getting anywhere here with you, instead of diving deeper into this black hole let's leave it as it is. The bottom line is that you made a statement and I asked for clarification (you don't have to answer, nobody is making you but expect to be called out when bullshiting), if you don't want to be asked questions or people replying to your posts, refrain from posting at all as it solves the problem. I will see you the next time you act like you know better so we can fire it up again, maybe you'll surprise me and actually come up with an answer next time:)
You really should take your own advice about making a statement and being called out when bullshiting.

But I'll agree to drop this.
 

LinkBox88

Member
Feb 22, 2020
260
519
Whenever these games take place in an emergency/disaster setting, I always feel the sex feels too stupid.

I like a supernatural/mystery intrigue as much as the next guy but you have to find a way to make the sex organic and believable in that setting. Our MC takes his duties seriously and already has a hot girl when the game starts. A huge supernatural mystery that depends on him starts and it seems that's taking all his attention but he still finds the time to adulterous sex spree the town in the middle of a huge emergency and that doesn't really get explained or justified. Additionally, the town's women are all depending on him to save them but despite being impatient for the disaster to be over, they have no issue distracting him from his task to bang him.

Too jarring for me bro. Behavior has to make sense.
 
May 26, 2023
75
43
Whenever these games take place in an emergency/disaster setting, I always feel the sex feels too stupid.

I like a supernatural/mystery intrigue as much as the next guy but you have to find a way to make the sex organic and believable in that setting. Our MC takes his duties seriously and already has a hot girl when the game starts. A huge supernatural mystery that depends on him starts and it seems that's taking all his attention but he still finds the time to adulterous sex spree the town in the middle of a huge emergency and that doesn't really get explained or justified. Additionally, the town's women are all depending on him to save them but despite being impatient for the disaster to be over, they have no issue distracting him from his task to bang him.

Too jarring for me bro. Behavior has to make sense.
There are people that want to play all routes, try everything, etc. This creator doesn't usually lock the players into one choice for the duration of the game, only in the endings. In other words, it's up to you to play the game how you feel. I, for example, take all the content available and you're right, it's weird and not normal. But I'm expecting that to be the case because those were my choices, to break realism and go around town fucking everything that moves. If I want a more realistic aproach, I'll stick with the GF and MAYBE have an adventure with another girl. You are free to choose how you want to play, if it's too strange and weird, don't get it on with all of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexMpog

LinkBox88

Member
Feb 22, 2020
260
519
There are people that want to play all routes, try everything, etc. This creator doesn't usually lock the players into one choice for the duration of the game, only in the endings. In other words, it's up to you to play the game how you feel. I, for example, take all the content available and you're right, it's weird and not normal. But I'm expecting that to be the case because those were my choices, to break realism and go around town fucking everything that moves. If I want a more realistic aproach, I'll stick with the GF and MAYBE have an adventure with another girl. You are free to choose how you want to play, if it's too strange and weird, don't get it on with all of them.
Good for you being satisfied but I don't think you should have to choose between sexual content and roleplaying realistic behaviors. There's all kinds of ways to have your cake and eat it too.

You can make having sex a survival mechanism (reduces the influence of a witch or the effects of her powers), you can make him sleeping around a previous trait that continues rather than some kind of new hobby he picks up in an emergency, you can make the GF an accessory to his philandering (cuckquean or something).

My enjoyment of these kind of games is roleplaying the MC. I'd rather do what is in character for that person than just make choices based on the content I would like to see. But just like an actor who wants to play a role well, you need to understand the motivations and desires of a character to play them well. YOU just want to be able to fuck everything without caring about anything else but is that how our MC feels or should feel? The story should be compelling no matter what my choices end up being.
 
4.00 star(s) 16 Votes