Does he struggle to wrap up his games?cause it's made by daniels k and his games tend to take a dive sooner or later.
Does he struggle to wrap up his games?cause it's made by daniels k and his games tend to take a dive sooner or later.
It's the vapors that ignite, having been trained to fight Jet aircraft fires, oil fires, kerosene fires, wood, paper, .... I know what I am talking about. You think a police agency doesn't have incendiary rounds?Ask chatgpt my friend :
It’s mostly a myth. In movies, shooting a can of gasoline makes it explode in a huge fireball, but in reality, it’s much harder to ignite gasoline that way. Here’s why:
- Bullets Alone Don’t Spark Enough – Most bullets just punch a hole through the can. Regular lead or copper bullets don’t produce enough sparks or heat to ignite gasoline.
- Gasoline Needs the Right Conditions to Ignite – Liquid gasoline doesn’t burn; it’s the vapors that are flammable. Even if a bullet creates a spark, there’s no guarantee there will be enough vapor mixed with oxygen at the right concentration to ignite.
Let's just say DK has a long and well established history of a smooth takeoff but then fails to stick the landing. In fact I personally don't rate any of his landings as anything but crash landings.Does he struggle to wrap up his games?
They clearly state that all that's left is a rifle and a hand gun. And the guys going on the roof aren't even police. Apparently they don't have incendiary rounds or nukes or anything else.It's the vapors that ignite, having been trained to fight Jet aircraft fires, oil fires, kerosene fires, wood, paper, .... I know what I am talking about. You think a police agency doesn't have incendiary rounds?
I asked this question before and I'll keep asking it, out of curiosity, how would you do it better? Or, what is a better way of doing it? Provide us with an example for whatever crash landing ending you think would be better.Let's just say DK has a long and well established history of a smooth takeoff but then fails to stick the landing. In fact I personally don't rate any of his landings as anything but crash landings.
Countless people have detailed how DK is no good at storytelling. Why don't you actually spend some time reading the threads in this and previous DK games instead of asking yet again? We are not your mom. We are not responsible for spoon-feeding you all the answers.I asked this question before and I'll keep asking it, out of curiosity, how would you do it better? Or, what is a better way of doing it? Provide us with an example for whatever crash landing ending you think would be better.
In other words, you say something and we're supposed to believe you because you said it. And why would I have to read all the threads when I can make up my own mind about things from experience. I'm not jumping on the sheep wagon that takes for granted whatever other sheeps say before it. You keep claiming this shit and that shit without bringing any substance or proof to what you're saying, except that "others said it before so it must be true". And why do you refer to yourself as "we", what's up with that?Countless people have detailed how DK is no good at storytelling. Why don't you actually spend some time reading the threads in this and previous DK games instead of asking yet again? We are not your mom. We are not responsible for spoon-feeding you all the answers.
Why would you read all the threads? Because the answers that you have asked for repeatedly (according to your own words) , are already presented there in broad daylight for anyone to see for many years.In other words, you say something and we're supposed to believe you because you said it. And why would I have to read all the threads when I can make up my own mind about things from experience. I'm not jumping on the sheep wagon that takes for granted whatever other sheeps say before it. You keep claiming this shit and that shit without bringing any substance or proof to what you're saying, except that "others said it before so it must be true". And why do you refer to yourself as "we", what's up with that?
I didn't ask for all the answers, I asked for one answer, I asked for you to back up your empty words with some substance and you keep avoiding it time and time again. Giving an explanation about something that you said and you stick by, isn't spoon feeding, it's called being a normal human with a brain.
You know how you sounded right now? Like this :
- How old are you? (asks normal human with a brain)
- Like wtf, do I need to spoon feed you all the answers? Ask my friends, my family, like wtf do I have to explain myself? (says the we guy)
Clearly I'm not getting anywhere here with you, instead of diving deeper into this black hole let's leave it as it is. The bottom line is that you made a statement and I asked for clarification (you don't have to answer, nobody is making you but expect to be called out when bullshiting), if you don't want to be asked questions or people replying to your posts, refrain from posting at all as it solves the problem. I will see you the next time you act like you know better so we can fire it up again, maybe you'll surprise me and actually come up with an answer next timeWhy would you read all the threads? Because the answers that you have asked for repeatedly (according to your own words) , are already presented there in broad daylight for anyone to see for many years.
Someone asked if DK struggles to wrap up his game and I provided my opinion, which happens to be widely shared among people what have played all of DK's games for all these years. However, nowhere did I say it's the only valid opinion.
I do not need to prove anything, nor am I obligated to satisfy your personal curiosity by providing an example of how I can do it better.
But since you started this argument, if it's so important to prove something and provide an example, the onus is on YOU to prove that I'm wrong and provide an example.
And to play your game, you know how you sounded right now? Like this :
- Marvoch - I have a SUBJECTIVE question (asks normal human with a brain)
- Me - Here's a SUBJECTIVE answer (answers normal human with a brain)
- You - Prove it (interjects passive aggressive human that doesn't agree with a well known common opinion)
- Me - Like wtf, it's a widely held and documented opinion, go take a look you lazy ass, we don't spoon feed around here (answers annoyed human being put off by the passive aggressiveness)
- You - No, it's not up to me to go take a look and learn for myself, you must satisfy my personal curiosity and convince me and prove your opinion is right or you are a brainless sheep on a sheep wagon (doubles down on passive aggressiveness with gaslighting)
You really should take your own advice about making a statement and being called out when bullshiting.Clearly I'm not getting anywhere here with you, instead of diving deeper into this black hole let's leave it as it is. The bottom line is that you made a statement and I asked for clarification (you don't have to answer, nobody is making you but expect to be called out when bullshiting), if you don't want to be asked questions or people replying to your posts, refrain from posting at all as it solves the problem. I will see you the next time you act like you know better so we can fire it up again, maybe you'll surprise me and actually come up with an answer next time![]()
there are some games where mc gets to shave his gf/etc pussy.
Examples?
There are people that want to play all routes, try everything, etc. This creator doesn't usually lock the players into one choice for the duration of the game, only in the endings. In other words, it's up to you to play the game how you feel. I, for example, take all the content available and you're right, it's weird and not normal. But I'm expecting that to be the case because those were my choices, to break realism and go around town fucking everything that moves. If I want a more realistic aproach, I'll stick with the GF and MAYBE have an adventure with another girl. You are free to choose how you want to play, if it's too strange and weird, don't get it on with all of them.Whenever these games take place in an emergency/disaster setting, I always feel the sex feels too stupid.
I like a supernatural/mystery intrigue as much as the next guy but you have to find a way to make the sex organic and believable in that setting. Our MC takes his duties seriously and already has a hot girl when the game starts. A huge supernatural mystery that depends on him starts and it seems that's taking all his attention but he still finds the time to adulterous sex spree the town in the middle of a huge emergency and that doesn't really get explained or justified. Additionally, the town's women are all depending on him to save them but despite being impatient for the disaster to be over, they have no issue distracting him from his task to bang him.
Too jarring for me bro. Behavior has to make sense.
Good for you being satisfied but I don't think you should have to choose between sexual content and roleplaying realistic behaviors. There's all kinds of ways to have your cake and eat it too.There are people that want to play all routes, try everything, etc. This creator doesn't usually lock the players into one choice for the duration of the game, only in the endings. In other words, it's up to you to play the game how you feel. I, for example, take all the content available and you're right, it's weird and not normal. But I'm expecting that to be the case because those were my choices, to break realism and go around town fucking everything that moves. If I want a more realistic aproach, I'll stick with the GF and MAYBE have an adventure with another girl. You are free to choose how you want to play, if it's too strange and weird, don't get it on with all of them.