I was about to debate about it… But then i remember about that memory scene with “young Callum” and “young Mae”… And yeah, if they said that they were 18 in the present…
Well, yeah, there’s no way to savage it…
But at this point, who cares about it, people came to fap with whatever they see… Now it’s just… If it has a feminine body, “fappable”, that’s just how it works by now…
Maybe Milda is japanese or don’t know, but either way, he wouldn’t give a fuck about it…
But yeah, you’re right, all of us are fucked, and… Yeah! That’s just that.
You can use my opinion like a condom if you want and throw it away!
let's asume that in daily lives world a year is longer than a real life year, so they're older than they looks xd (?)
ok now being serious, at least personally i have no problem with almost anything but toddler, gore, torture or anything obviously unconsent
but still, i think the major thing in everything is separate fiction with reality. Everybody can have the most weird, deviant or even stupid kink; As long as you don't hurt anybody or try to bring that to reality xd
let's asume that in daily lives world a year is longer than a real life year, so they're older than they looks xd (?)
ok now being serious, at least personally i have no problem with almost anything but toddler, gore, torture or anything obviously unconsent
but still, i think the major thing in everything is separate fiction with reality. Everybody can have the most weird, deviant or even stupid kink; As long as you don't hurt anybody or try to bring that to reality xd
Kink wise I understand. But the types of girls you are attracted to isn’t a good thing to talk about if they look like Pixie or Ana or Mabel. I’m cool with pretty much anything except girls that look very underage as it seems wrong.
let's asume that in daily lives world a year is longer than a real life year, so they're older than they looks xd (?)
ok now being serious, at least personally i have no problem with almost anything but toddler, gore, torture or anything obviously unconsent
but still, i think the major thing in everything is separate fiction with reality. Everybody can have the most weird, deviant or even stupid kink; As long as you don't hurt anybody or try to bring that to reality xd
Not everyone will think like you, an example is ntr, there are people who hate that a game has a subplot with ntr. IMHO, those people see themselves as the protagonist being duped. how i hate google translate
Kink wise I understand. But the types of girls you are attracted to isn’t a good thing to talk about if they look like Pixie or Ana or Mabel. I’m cool with pretty much anything except girls that look very underage as it seems wrong.
bruh, lots of fairy are old. Try not to have an Australian POV when looking at chicks is "if they have no tits or ass we ban and crucify them"... I think pixie has child-bearing hips so maybe Milda could make it look like a dump truck for you
bruh, lots of fairy are old. Try not to have an Australian POV when looking at chicks is "if they have no tits or ass we ban and crucify them"... I think pixie has child-bearing hips so maybe Milda could make it look like a dump truck for you
Ah, now here's some interesting topics of discussion: the moral and ethical principles of actions taken toward characters in media and how people that consume that media react to it.
For some reason adult media somehow ends up with ethical and moral rules applied differently than other media, which has always been strange to me. In a fictional story people can be described as graphically killing, having sex in bizarre ways, committing bestiality or incest or even abusing children, and all of this only serves to provoke responses from the consumers of that story. People can appreciate the emotions it provokes in them, become invested, and are often strongly influenced by the story as a result.
But if you dare try to do the exact same thing, but in a setting that is supposed to provide sexual gratification to the consumer? Oh, people react much more strongly, and rules get applied more strictly.
I think it's nonsense. If you create a person in your mind that only exists in there, you can do whatever you want to that person without hurting anyone, and think and feel about it however you like. That should not be unethical nor immoral. Likewise, writing down what you do to the person in your mind still doesn't hurt anyone, and should not be wrong. Even if you draw or animate that person, it's still a fictional person that doesn't think, feel or have rights. Traditional media try to convey thoughts and feelings to consumers in one way, and is regarded as perfectly acceptable; adult media try to convey (often the same) thoughts and feelings to consumers another way, and is regarded as unacceptable. As I said: it's nonsense. All fiction should be free to be whatever its creator wants it to be, as long as it is purely fictitious.
And that's not even going into factors of style (where a creator's art-style may genuinely just tend to make people look very young or old regardless of age, intentionally or unintentionally) and in-universe deviations from the norms of ours (such as where one condition or another (genetic manipulation, vampirism, being an elf/fairy/whatever) might make it so that characters can appear a different age than they actually are).
Getting up in arms over things you don't agree with or are unethical in fiction is pointless. It's not real. The story as a cohesive entity is real, and if a particular event or character detracts from the story I think calling it out is proper, but really... having sex with a fairy, regardless of what she happens to look like, is entirely in line with the story of this game. I'm not personally looking forward to it (though I will freely admit that what I want the most is more Anna-content, preferably something that involves better, consensual, less expensive vaginal penetration), but bemoaning how wrong it is or how sick people are for potentially enjoying it is pointless.
Pixie isn't real; it can't hurt you, and you can't hurt it. Everybody wins.
Ah, now here's some interesting topics of discussion: the moral and ethical principles of actions taken toward characters in media and how people that consume that media react to it.
For some reason adult media somehow ends up with ethical and moral rules applied differently than other media, which has always been strange to me. In a fictional story people can be described as graphically killing, having sex in bizarre ways, committing bestiality or incest or even abusing children, and all of this only serves to provoke responses from the consumers of that story. People can appreciate the emotions it provokes in them, become invested, and are often strongly influenced by the story as a result.
But if you dare try to do the exact same thing, but in a setting that is supposed to provide sexual gratification to the consumer? Oh, people react much more strongly, and rules get applied more strictly.
I think it's nonsense. If you create a person in your mind that only exists in there, you can do whatever you want to that person without hurting anyone, and think and feel about it however you like. That should not be unethical nor immoral. Likewise, writing down what you do to the person in your mind still doesn't hurt anyone, and should not be wrong. Even if you draw or animate that person, it's still a fictional person that doesn't think, feel or have rights. Traditional media try to convey thoughts and feelings to consumers in one way, and is regarded as perfectly acceptable; adult media try to convey (often the same) thoughts and feelings to consumers another way, and is regarded as unacceptable. As I said: it's nonsense. All fiction should be free to be whatever its creator wants it to be, as long as it is purely fictitious.
And that's not even going into factors of style (where a creator's art-style may genuinely just tend to make people look very young or old regardless of age, intentionally or unintentionally) and in-universe deviations from the norms of ours (such as where one condition or another (genetic manipulation, vampirism, being an elf/fairy/whatever) might make it so that characters can appear a different age than they actually are).
Getting up in arms over things you don't agree with or are unethical in fiction is pointless. It's not real. The story as a cohesive entity is real, and if a particular event or character detracts from the story I think calling it out is proper, but really... having sex with a fairy, regardless of what she happens to look like, is entirely in line with the story of this game. I'm not personally looking forward to it (though I will freely admit that what I want the most is more Anna-content, preferably something that involves better, consensual, less expensive vaginal penetration), but bemoaning how wrong it is or how sick people are for potentially enjoying it is pointless.
Pixie isn't real; it can't hurt you, and you can't hurt it. Everybody wins.
Now that's not an argument, that's a stated opinion. Opinions don't change other opinions, and all it takes to refute an opinion is to say "I disagree".
Don't get me wrong, you and everyone else are also free to disagree with me, as long as you understand that none of us are under any obligation to share or accommodate opinions unless we want to.
My point exactly, concisely put (minus the call for violence; don't get me wrong, I might want to do that, too, but then I would be breaking the law and be subject to prison time, thus my own response being reporting to law enforcement rather than vigilante justice).
