- Jul 12, 2017
- 1,135
- 1,071
Just checked her Deviantart and Twitter...
This one do be takin' the spotlight for her, for better or for worse
This one do be takin' the spotlight for her, for better or for worse
you mean the "AI" one? Well, for sure it's going to kick a hornet's nest.Just checked her Deviantart and Twitter...
This one do be takin' the spotlight for her, for better or for worse
Yeahyou mean the "AI" one? Well, for sure it's going to kick a hornet's nest.
and they had every right to do so since they are the ones who pay and actively support her. Hagrane the fact is that once trust is broken, it can't be mended. I'm slightly annoyed by dandon reusing assets like she's fromsoftware and i don't complain about it because I'm not a supporter, but if i did, I'd tear her a new one.Yeah
People started getting disappointed and feel betrayed and someone told Dandon that this better be the first and the last artwork that uses "AI"
When human and interface line blurs really nicely it's only a matter of time that a genuine work of your hand can be mistaken as AI, Dandon is just one of these casesShe could solve by just showing how she's done it tbf. I'm sure it's not AI and I can't even say does it look like it or not, but Dandon need to proove it I guess.
Overall I wanna say thanks to those people who thought that ripping of someonse art to teach some neural network to creat "art" is a great idea, now if you do something that do might look like AI are (although it is genuine) people will destroy this author.
It can be mended, though, yeah, it's gonna be a long way to the top to get those trust back -- As if her lack of communication drained enough goodwill for potential supporters, I supposeand they had every right to do so since they are the ones who pay and actively support her. @Hagrane the fact is that once trust is broken, it can't be mended. I'm slightly annoyed by dandon reusing assets like she's fromsoftware and i don't complain about it because I'm not a supporter, but if i did, I'd tear her a new one.
This is not longer about the images since Dandon cleared that up so there's no point beating a dead horse.It can be mended, though, yeah, it's gonna be a long way to the top to get those trust back -- As if her lack of communication drained enough goodwill for potential supporters, I suppose
Fair enough. Maybe I just so desensitized with AI now that I don't get overly mad about it or losing my trust that fast over something that immediately irks the public.This is not longer about the images since Dandon cleared that up so there's no point beating a dead horse.
Ime, trust can't be rebuilt. Once smone screws up with you, the whole idea you have of them crumbles. You second guess every thing they do and say, looking for deception.
“Trust takes years to build, seconds to break, and forever to repair”
The line is pretty blurry and the gap getting closer, too, so jumping the gun thinking that it was (by an AI) is an expected reaction to be honestWhile I agree there isn't a point in talking about this anymore, I kinda wanna just add my take. I can see the immediate thinking of it's an AI pic, it has that kinda shine that AI pics have but I have a feeling it really isn't at all. It feels like it's a case of paranoia causing everyone to see or feel something is wrong when there actually isn't. I've done it a bunch myself.
Keep in mind that she's coming out of the water and people usually shine when covered in water so it might be a case of just bad circumstances. She might be trying something a touch different than what the oil shine usually is. On top of that, once the thought is there it's tough not to get out of your head and be more unbiased and objective. I think she didn't want to show the process because IF it happens to be apart of Patreon rewards she probably feels that breaks the "contract" of those rewards and chose not to go through with showing them.
I lurk like 99% of the time and I'm sorry if I got the wrong impression but from reading these posts it kinda looks like a number of you have belief that it is AI 100%. I could be totally wrong but I wanted to throw my hat in.
The Internet is getting fucking insane with this AI stuff, this is one of the most insane witch hunts i've ever seen. It's pointless to discuss It, AI now exists, and It gets better at every second as humans keep using their services while at the same time feeding them with data. In one year they will be so effective at their jobs that you will not be able to know If AI was used on an art piece or not, so what Is the point?While I agree there isn't a point in talking about this anymore, I kinda wanna just add my take. I can see the immediate thinking of it's an AI pic, it has that kinda shine that AI pics have but I have a feeling it really isn't at all. It feels like it's a case of paranoia causing everyone to see or feel something is wrong when there actually isn't. I've done it a bunch myself.
Keep in mind that she's coming out of the water and people usually shine when covered in water so it might be a case of just bad circumstances. She might be trying something a touch different than what the oil shine usually is. On top of that, once the thought is there it's tough not to get out of your head and be more unbiased and objective. I think she didn't want to show the process because IF it happens to be apart of Patreon rewards she probably feels that breaks the "contract" of those rewards and chose not to go through with showing them.
I lurk like 99% of the time and I'm sorry if I got the wrong impression but from reading these posts it kinda looks like a number of you have belief that it is AI 100%. I could be totally wrong but I wanted to throw my hat in.
Gonna give a little cent here, this is as far as I can understand:Corporations have decided that AI is the future of pretty much everything, and I don't see a bunch of nerds like us on the internet stopping it