8TB
Member
- Dec 24, 2023
- 341
- 2,266
But couldn't that be said about virtually every comic? What is a 3D sexually explicit comic other than repeated sex? Even if one changes the characters, it's still a penis going into a mouth, or between tits, or in the vagina, or in a woman's rectum, etc. And given that every female model pretty much bears the same exaggerated proportions, there's little distinction between the "stencils" among artists. The distinction between these comics are the ideas expressed through the narrative. Otherwise, there'd be no difference between reading this content and watching pornography. Do you honestly believe those who enjoy "Mother-son" incest are the slightest bit perturbed at the prospect of a mother-son couple having sex repeatedly?But at the end the story is the same Lana having sex behind Alex's back who paid the bills over and over there is not evolution, at the end they only want to see new sex positions because the story is repeating itself.
Now if you're arguing for better dialogue, and a break from this "public sex" or "exhibitionist" bent that seems to have pervaded this comic since Chapter Five, then I doubt Daval's auctioning off plot points will be much of a remedy. Or, and this is what I tell everyone, why not just admit that the issue is, as opposed to the plot lacking "evolution" or becoming "boring," is that "I as a reader of this comic don't take much interest in seeing just Daniel and Lana having sex"? For example, I don't like the public sex, I don't like the voyeurism, even by Sofia, I don't like Daniel referring to his mother as "bitch" or Lana referring to herself as "whore," or "slut," but I'm not going to claim that the story is "boring" or lacks "evolution" if Daval continues to insert the aforementioned. I can own up to the fact that I dislike something as opposed to arguing a quality to the comic that is ONLY informed by my displeasure.