Of Daval3D's three main comics, the most popular has undoubtedly been Immoral Desires. So it's easier to apologize over a plate of someone's favorite food. Than with any other. It's not for nothing that most ID publications usually receive more support than the others.
And that makes it all the more interesting when we here on this forum have exchanges over which comic is more popular when, at least in my estimation and I assume in the estimation of most,
Immoral Desires is undoubtedly the most popular. And what's even more interesting is the complaints by few that either
Immoral Desires is getting "boring" or that his other works, namely
V.I.P. Madness: Together, is somehow more interesting or more popular, just aren't supported by the numbers either here on this forum or Daval's subscribestar (though to be fair, the novelty of Aaron and Sarah's sexual engagement has provided a much needed boost in MT's popularity.) And I think this has been the typical response of those whom I've mentioned because they're, unsuccessfully, trying to validate their criticisms. In reality, they're either vexed or upset that their preferences, i.e. meaningless, casual, polyamorous sex, isn't as popular as they may have thought. I mean
Immoral Desires, which features a virtually monoamorous relationship (Lana's sex with her husband being the exception) has been going on for 11 chapters and it's Daval
MOST POPULAR comic. And I would presume that these gripers, complainants if you will, fear the prospects of their preferences being played out because they know that Daval will cater to the most popular trend.
And last, if I can just mention, Immoral Desires is Daval's most popular comic, not only because Lana is his most attractive character, but also there are some real life dynamics going on. I won't mention much about the Oedipus Complex because it's present in most of his comics. Anyone who has dated, or messed around, has probably experienced the phenomenon of categorizing sexual prospects: (1) there are women with whom you just have "fun," i.e. keep it casual, and (2) there are women whom you "lock down," i.e. wine, dine, and romance. Daniel's sexual prospects with Lana would reflect the latter. Lana's appearance doesn't indicate "slutty." If anything it indicates an insanely attractive modest beauty, whose sexual interactions should reflect her design and personality. And I think that's the reason we've seen push back on the idea of not only Lana having more partners, but also Daniel. In other words, I think most of the fans want to see Lana and Daniel "lock each other down." And thus, the reason the jealous angles work so well, whether it's Lana making Daniel jealous with her husband, or Daniel making Lana jealous with her friends. (I also think that the lack of an incestuous angle as it concerns Daniel and Lana's friends may also be coming into play.) Even Daniel's cousin, Sharon, who's been present as a "younger Lana" may get push back, because at the end of the day, none of these female characters can compete with Lana. And with a character whose design is as attractive as Lana's, casual meaningless sex just isn't up to snuff. And giving Daniel more women with whom to have sex, just cheapens the sex he's already having with Lana, and the character built throughout all these chapters. And I think that's what has Daval in a bit of a rut because he probably always intended to expand Daniel's sexual opportunities, but because of the popularity of Daniel and Lana's monogamy, he's been relying on gimmicks to "keep it going," i.e. sex at the supermarket, sex at Martha's house (which should've ended a chapter ago,) sex at the mall, sex in front of a drunk Sofia, sex in the pool, and now sex in the bushes. And when Daval runs out of gimmicks, that's when the clock starts. Will he be faithful to the narrative he's cultivated, or will he betray it for a seemingly new gimmick and audience?