Don’t get me wrong ID is good and has its charm however there are times where the story just feels like it’s kinda stuck or the same thing happens each chapter which is Daniel tries Lana to confess her feelings while having risky sex so they don’t get caught.
I won't dispute that the "Weekend at Martha's" took longer than it should have. Daval, after all, stated himself that this arc was supposed to end by the conclusion of Chapter 10. But, now that they're home, why are you guys still complaining? The risk of exposure is present in all three comics. All of them are having "risky sex" and trying to prevent themselves from getting caught, except for maybe Alexa in
Satisfying Needs who's secretly taping herself, her sister, and her nephew in addition to Emma and Mr. Lennon. So if the "risky sex" informs a boring element, then that should true for all three comics. And so we come to this statement:
Compare that to TO where it’s aunt with nephew then gets taken advantage of Uncle while Aaron is sleep raping Alice, Aaron then sees Sarah sleep raping David and his disgust turns into sexual urge, Alice gets raped by random woman on toilet and ultimately catches the two of them and now we have Aaron fucking Sarah and hopefully sometime soon Alice with David.
Without providing credence to your description of rape, all you've done here is outline how
V.I.P. Madness: Together's plot is designed differently than
Immoral Desires.
V.I.P. Madness: Together is about Sarah, David, Alice, and Aaron, and to lesser extents Luke and Uncle Peter (assuming Daval breaks his promise, and keeps him in the story.)
Immoral Desires is about Daniel, Lana, and Alex. So it would stand to reason that the former's plot would involve more characters, and the latter's plot would involve fewer. And if one format caters to your fetish better than the other, I have no interest in arguing against that. My argument is and has always been, why do you have to trash one comic to demonstrate your favor of another? And that's the current trend among the complainants. I like
Immoral Deisres; I like
V.I.P. Madness: Together; I like
Satisfying Needs (for the most part.) We should know by now that each comic has its own approach to playing out incest themes. And when there are some who demonstrate more interest in letting this thread know with incessant repetition how they find one of these comics "boring," all that tells me is that you want everyone else to share your responsibility for your displeasure (again, I'm not just talking about you, Travaruz, or even you at all, now that I think about it. I don't think you complain much.) And if you continue to read things you find "boring," then that also tells me that you don't mind reading and following "boring" material, which diminish the weight of the criticism.
And no i don’t resent that Lana isn’t “shared“ because she is insanely attractive,
So you prefer "shared"? I didn't mention anything about that.
as a matter of a fact i prefer Sarah
And I prefer Lana; that doesn't change that I think Sarah is insanely attractive as well, or even Amanda and Alexa.
cuz she looks more feminine.
For curiosity's sake, how does Sarah look more feminine?
Also both Daniel and Pete are rapists, both women kept saying no and didn’t ultimately wanted it, they even begged them to stop but they didn’t and the women had to accept it. It’s not an issue since it’s just comics but yeah that’s rape, dude.
And this is an unfortunate hallmark of your generation: that is, the nuance of human interaction can be catalogued into verbal absolutes. I once tickled my adult younger sister despite her verbal protests; I even pressed my lips against her navel and created a vibration, much akin to what I used to do when she was a baby; the only admonishment I received, despite my not asking her consent, was her saying, "you play too much." My ex-girlfriend once kissed me all over and jerked me off while I was sleeping as my roommates watched on (though she didn't know that they were watching at the time.) Did she sexually assault me? Could I have not provided ex-post-facto consent? Would I even have to? What about every time we had sex and we used no words? Is there nothing to be said about our sentiments toward each other, and that being the standard for our personal space and boundaries, as opposed to ceding that responsibility to Western Law?
Are we going to indiscriminately refer to all of their actions as "rape"? Or is there no room for context? Were their, Lana's, Sarah's, etc., protests against the acts merely a declaration of their personal space, or was it the "morality" that Daval would subvert, in acting out these incestuous pairings? And if neither Lana, nor Sarah, held their alleged "rapists" accountable for forcing themselves past each of their personal boundaries, could it then be said, they, Lana and Sarah that is, don't think of the acts as severely as you do?
