4.80 star(s) 5 Votes

Dami28

Newbie
Mar 28, 2025
43
116
Irony is reading incest comics and consider morality on a rape. It's a comic and both are wrong .You can't be ok with incest and condem rape. Btw lana said daniel owns her body so he can use whenever he want.
I agree with you should condem both, My point is just I disagree with the concept that having sex with someone unconscious is not rape. Of course is just a comic I respect all opinions. You can read about BDSM and condemn that practice or whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
May 8, 2024
106
152
I agree with you should condem both, My point is just I disagree with the concept that having sex with someone unconscious is not rape. Of course is just a comic I respect all opinions. You can read about BDSM and condemn that practice or whatsoever.
Virtually every modern legal system defines sexual activity with an unconscious person as rape, regardless of the relationship between the individuals involved. Consent must be conscious, informed, and ongoing. The last one means that even if someone gives prior authorization, they can revoke it at any time. None of this is possible when a person is asleep or otherwise unconscious. Even within a marriage, such an act is legally considered rape. Therefore, regardless of your opinion, the facts define the act as what it is: rape.

But then again, as far as we know, he is possibly underage (hinted) and her son (obvious), which implies multiple forms of rape already, including statutory rape, incestuous rape, and rape of a minor. All charges to be served to his mother.
 

8TB

Member
Dec 24, 2023
392
2,611
Virtually every modern legal system defines sexual activity with an unconscious person as rape, regardless of the relationship between the individuals involved. Consent must be conscious, informed, and ongoing. The last one means that even if someone gives prior authorization, they can revoke it at any time. None of this is possible when a person is asleep or otherwise unconscious. Even within a marriage, such an act is legally considered rape. Therefore, regardless of your opinion, the facts define the act as what it is: rape.

But then again, as far as we know, he is possibly underage (hinted) and her son (obvious), which implies multiple forms of rape already, including statutory rape, incestuous rape, and rape of a minor. All charges to be served to his mother.
Hence the term must be qualified using the modifier, "legally." It adds nothing more to an argument than a statement like, "The Emir of Qatar has declared that my touching a female's hand is considered sexual assault." Can we really state as a people that arbitrary statutes should take precedence over the preferences of the involved parties? There's no context in which this can be considered other than opinion. And the only opinions that matter are Daval's, expressed through his characters. That is, if Lana has allowed her son to impose on her personal space and has affirmed his discretion to do this at will, then that's all that matters. If you want to state, "in my country, that's considered rape..." you're more than welcome to. That however is not even as remotely as important as what Lana, and by proxy Daval, considers it.

And I think you've done a service by pointing out the legal considerations for statutory rape, because I do know for a fact that a number of those who are condemning Daniel's actions actively seek out Daval's V.I.P. content where the male characters are below the age of consent, thereby constituting, as you put it, "legal rape." So, it's kind of surprising, well... not so much, to see this "selective outrage" especially when it's based on a no less arbitrary description of rape.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dami28

Dami28

Newbie
Mar 28, 2025
43
116
I do know for a fact that a number of those who are condemning Daniel's actions actively seek out Daval's V.I.P. content where the male characters are below the age of consent

Good point. ID I am not sure Daniel's age but don¡t gives the vibe of under age of consent, in mi country is sixteen. But Madness Together in case of Aaron.......not to mention the special editions of Daval's
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8TB

notmoji

New Member
Mar 28, 2020
11
3
EDIT: ID 1 - 11 (Original resolution, English) new link:

EDIT (5:48PM EST): Realized I forgot to add chapter 9. Uploading fixed version now.

EDIT (6:50PM EST): Sorry it took so long. Gofile was weird and a sweaty Jin ki charged me.

Final update, all chapters, original resolution (3200 x 2200), all in English. They're all in one folder, and all in order (obviously) to make it easier to read. If there's a problem, let me know.
Can you please upload the ID 11 alone, I have the rest and it feels like a waste to download 3Gb for just one chapter.
Thanks in advance
 

Moan Buster

Formerly 'ID fan'
Apr 26, 2025
15
55
I agree with you should condem both, My point is just I disagree with the concept that having sex with someone unconscious is not rape. Of course is just a comic I respect all opinions. You can read about BDSM and condemn that practice or whatsoever.
I agree the scene is not looking appealing and necessary and it's not the first time he did that without her consent. If you look closely all incest comics will have same trait. It will be without consent as its Taboo and mom will not willingly participate in sex in the beginning in all the incest comics as they will show some restraint. Finaly the comic name is IMmoral desire and looking for morality in it is pointless. It's like we are searching diamonds in a sewage.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: _OBLIVION_

King of Paradise

New Member
May 8, 2025
6
2
Gracious,Fellow Earthlings,middleland dwellers,

I have been observing this forum since like some last October,2024(maybe?),
And for the recent outlash,the way things are going,its beyond this thread,but more about world,so here's some understanding need to be shared wise,

02:49pm ist,
Dear mods,please take the wise words,filter the emotions,spread it wise,

We all know that,Porn as the industry,which is "purely fictional",work,authorized someway,needed clarity within multiple years,

Thing is,humans as we are,care about Gossiping,seeing,knowing things,As that what makes us "Communication superior,which helped us peak in Evolution itself",

So porn(incest or any),
An average Adult would default knew that its all works,though how much realistically done,by writing,performance or any,

Adults with general maturity,would finish watching & get out,

Adults have this ability "Grown" as simple maturity,to "Differ between fictional & real world,so they don't,won't rig own life by mixing them",
+walking away,as normal day+

And to those underage,regardless of Age,Consent,situations or anything involved,

Any minors that someway involved in such acts,even worse,presumably with adults(even worse is senior elders),

Would cause "life scares for eternity,both mentality,physically,...

a cancer that keeps haunting them nightmares,doesn't let live life even "Pure Love" happens,

Eventually becomes a generational chain of Sufferings,than endurance"..

Seen,heard many people,who were by peer pressure,went to have multiple bf(or gf),

Stories of them,Getting abused by own actions,couldn't identify,differ,realize the "Love vs Lust,casual meetings",

Eventually they realize they have been used on,
Finally Regrets..

I am talking about only if they find right ones,loving them,even feared to hurting all,
And its all just "consent" put minors,teenage dating,with similar age..
02:58/9pm ist 21may25
 
  • Like
Reactions: MEFANBOY

King of Paradise

New Member
May 8, 2025
6
2
Continue,02:59pi

And regarding minors,its only about similar age,

If its about with Adult (or even worse elder),
Such damage nearly permanently would last longer in mental trauma,even more that,even sickly greed would feel worry for such souls,

And to that,compared Adults with minors scenario,

Adults know,treat porn as entertainment & leaving,
Minors are having many worse cases(not just mostly,nearly all) so they're precautionary grown well from such abyss,

And to those Elders,Seniors abusing younger ones(regardless of adults or minors),

Its not entertainment pursue,

But its a pattern,
Pattern if behaviours,

Those who endure,encourage such acts,
Regardless of age,preferences,story or vanilla,troll execuses,

Remember,to be wise,
To be safe,
I pray everyone to be safe,who may come around them,
Cause,

Such Behavioral Patterns only shows one thing,
Those are vile,inhumane,manipulative,narcissitic,rape & even worse sins,

That doesn't let such be termed in human sins scales(as they can't be considered humans or any beings anymore),

To be precisely clear,
Psychopaths,
Even Sociopaths,

Who only cares about themselves,gains from every others,abusing lives,
Regardless of factors they derive drive on,money or lust,
Those are objects,goals,
"Control" to them,

Reagrdless of how much "kinks",sexual preferences one play,

As adults,for lack of love interests,life in general(which echoes globally cause of reasons like economic to many),

Even porn is not some execuse for such monsters,
But rather some clickbaits to them,
"Normalizing themselves",

03:07pm

Please look at "old ones preying on young ones,usually leads to minors being abused",

Its a vicious cycle,chain,if torments,

So if you ever comes across someone,who is actually encourages such acts of "Elders powerplay over younger ones,anything as sexual,even normal life",

Beware of such,
No much of vicinty can save such,

They won't accept medical/psychology counseling help,
But feel happy to ruin other's minds to lives,

For summary:
To consume porn,one has to have knowledge of internet(though availability,its still factors of growing up,many can be grown well by little parenting,guidance)

Adults -> knows,treats it's an Entertainment & moves on,doesn't mix up life to ruin,highly matured by age,

Minors -> high risk of mental to physical abuses(even just by consumption,such complex thoughts takes toll on one's mental endurance),wise is to follow already norm of growing up,

Senior Elders -> those who consume,regardless of age,is rare,as many become wise,+so possibly 0th to none,(and they only reminisce the life,keen on memories making,world,than any indulgence)+

Seniors abuse younger ones --=> these are vile psychopaths,who should be reported,treated as PEDOs regardless of online consumptions,internet spending,ss they may or not indulge in such activities,eventually they incense such vile ones,

Simple as that,

Dear mods,
PLEASE TREAT THE ABOVE WORDS AS SOME MEASURE & TAKE CARE WORLD WELL,

Afterall,we humans as social beings,social animals,still need to be taught often,that's how we are civilized,

Vile ones may pose intelligence,to abuse other's lives,but beware,

Hope such wordse reach others,
Pardon for length,but message has to be spread,

Wise understanding glad,
Wish all be well by nature ✨
03:16/7pm ist 21may25
 
  • Like
Reactions: Will79*

King of Paradise

New Member
May 8, 2025
6
2
You did a great fight sir,
Been watching you fight against viles for months,
I know how much it would torment ones mental strength(than just abuse of consumers,a vile manipulator as Daval),

At times,self care is important,
Also,instead of calling out,

At times,Simple point out what they are,

Some simple google or medical article,just connects their deeds & abuse to people in general,may help spread awareness,

Afterall,idiots,greed,manipulative,narcissists won't accept anything that's true,that may cause them lose gains,

Even worse,they won't accept they're being "Exposed what they are",

I hereby recommend you,other fellow wise ones,
To please look at "mental scares of minors,by elders by such activities,in psychological,medical articles"(some google experience is better easy)
So having a point of view about something for which you paid for months and that the content is changed without a vote from subscribers, doesn't that seem like the least reason to complain? Or when you feel scammed are you going touch some grass?
Other than that,yeah by comparing the time frame for each chapters,its
Holier than you know who
03:30/5 pm ist 21may25
 

King of Paradise

New Member
May 8, 2025
6
2
One thing to say is,
03:38pi

By years(decades) of consumption,watched many as they're already done,developing,

I mean the pre internet boom of last decade,2010s,

Though free(don't worry pirate),amount of mental endurance one need,creativity,with lack of tools,maybe even legal issues,

Someway the years of delays felt "yeah,milking",(i mean those early ones,pre AI),

03:40pi
And to current scenario,of simple scrolls of chapters,only to find,

Bah Gawd,these are Just some "Elite Network Organization level scamming system in Developing Governments",

Like Daval may be the actual contender to,
Holier than thou,
The "You-know-Who",
The Myth,
The Legend,

The Milker,
The Kickstarter or just lucky bard,

Thats known as,

Darky Cookie Cutter of "Summer uno time Saga"(pardon for rules),

Like who is gonna challenge that throne,

Anyway,Daval is just Dark Cuckie of Comics Realms,

03:43pm ist 21may25
 

Abduxuel

Member
Jun 26, 2021
240
488
Just back to cut through the ridiculous amount of post facto bullshit and opinion hereabouts about rape. For an unbiased, definitive and accurate legal opinion I asked ChatGPT the following question:

"If a man has sex with a woman while she is unconscious, even if she gave him permission to do so while awake, would he be guilty of rape."

And ChatGPT's verdict was:

"Yes, in most legal systems, having sex with an unconscious person is considered rape, even if that person gave prior consent while conscious.

Here’s why:

1. Consent must be ongoing and conscious

  • Most modern legal definitions of consent require it to be informed, voluntary, and continuous.
  • Consent given ahead of time cannot override the fact that the person is unconscious and unable to revoke or modify that consent during the act.
  • A person must have the ability to change their mind at any time — something an unconscious person cannot do.
2. Legal precedent and case law
  • Courts in many jurisdictions have ruled that prior consent does not legalize sexual acts performed while the person is incapacitated.
  • Even if someone says "you can have sex with me later when I'm asleep," that does not make it lawful, because they are not actively consenting at the time of the act.
3. Ethical considerations
  • Apart from the legal aspect, there are serious moral and ethical issues with engaging in sex with someone who cannot participate, respond, or withdraw consent.
Exception (rare and legally complex)

In some committed relationships, particularly in cases where both partners have agreed to very specific and legally documented sexual boundaries (e.g., within some kink contexts), courts might take that into account — but even then, many legal systems still prohibit unconscious sex outright, regardless of prior agreement.

Summary: Yes, even if the woman gave permission while awake, sex with her while unconscious is almost certainly considered rape under the law in most jurisdictions. Consent must be active and ongoing, and unconscious people cannot legally or ethically provide it."


You can check this out by asking the AI the same question yourself; I really don't know why nobody thought to do this from the get go and settle the matter. I would have done so myself earlier but was otherwise occupied with work.

VERDICT: Daniel raped his unconscious mother and IS piece of shit rapist. End of.

You're welcome.(y)
 
Last edited:

Ivarr_993

Member
Jun 22, 2023
227
476
Just back to cut through the ridiculous post facto bullshit hereabouts about rape. For an unbiased and accurate opinion I asked ChatGPT the following:

"If a man has sex with a woman while she is unconscious, even if she gave him permission to do so while awake, would he be guilty of rape."

And ChatGPT's verdict was:

"Yes, in most legal systems, having sex with an unconscious person is considered rape, even if that person gave prior consent while conscious.

Here’s why:

1. Consent must be ongoing and conscious

  • Most modern legal definitions of consent require it to be informed, voluntary, and continuous.
  • Consent given ahead of time cannot override the fact that the person is unconscious and unable to revoke or modify that consent during the act.
  • A person must have the ability to change their mind at any time — something an unconscious person cannot do.
2. Legal precedent and case law
  • Courts in many jurisdictions have ruled that prior consent does not legalize sexual acts performed while the person is incapacitated.
  • Even if someone says "you can have sex with me later when I'm asleep," that does not make it lawful, because they are not actively consenting at the time of the act.
3. Ethical considerations
  • Apart from the legal aspect, there are serious moral and ethical issues with engaging in sex with someone who cannot participate, respond, or withdraw consent.
Exception (rare and legally complex)

In some committed relationships, particularly in cases where both partners have agreed to very specific and legally documented sexual boundaries (e.g., within some kink contexts), courts might take that into account — but even then, many legal systems still prohibit unconscious sex outright, regardless of prior agreement.

Summary: Yes, even if the woman gave permission while awake, sex with her while unconscious is almost certainly considered rape under the law in most jurisdictions. Consent must be active and ongoing, and unconscious people cannot legally or ethically provide it."


You can check it out for yourselves by asking the AI yourself; I really don't know why nobody thought to do this from the get go.

VERDICT: Daniel raped his unconscious mother and IS motherfucking rapist. End of.
(Do not take this personally nothing against you, it's just that this discussion about the "rape" scene in ID had become unsustainable right now). Who fucking cares if it's rape or not?! It's just a 3D comic, it's not real, ppl who have problem reading stuff like that could just skip the scene in this chapter or stop reading ID. Holy shit it's like going back to when Uncle Peter got introduced in TO. lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moan Buster

8TB

Member
Dec 24, 2023
392
2,611
Just back to cut through the bullshit about rape. I asked ChatGPT the following question for an unbiased opinion:

"If a man has sex with a woman while she is unconscious, even if she gave him permission to do so while awake, would he be guilty of rape."

And ChatGPT's verdict was:

"Yes, in most legal systems, having sex with an unconscious person is considered rape, even if that person gave prior consent while conscious.

Here’s why:

1. Consent must be ongoing and conscious

  • Most modern legal definitions of consent require it to be informed, voluntary, and continuous.
  • Consent given ahead of time cannot override the fact that the person is unconscious and unable to revoke or modify that consent during the act.
  • A person must have the ability to change their mind at any time — something an unconscious person cannot do.
2. Legal precedent and case law
  • Courts in many jurisdictions have ruled that prior consent does not legalize sexual acts performed while the person is incapacitated.
  • Even if someone says "you can have sex with me later when I'm asleep," that does not make it lawful, because they are not actively consenting at the time of the act.
3. Ethical considerations
  • Apart from the legal aspect, there are serious moral and ethical issues with engaging in sex with someone who cannot participate, respond, or withdraw consent.
Exception (rare and legally complex)

In some committed relationships, particularly in cases where both partners have agreed to very specific and legally documented sexual boundaries (e.g., within some kink contexts), courts might take that into account — but even then, many legal systems still prohibit unconscious sex outright, regardless of prior agreement.

Summary: Yes, even if the woman gave permission while awake, sex with her while unconscious is almost certainly considered rape under the law in most jurisdictions. Consent must be active and ongoing, and unconscious people cannot legally or ethically provide it."


You can check it out for yourselves; I really don't know why nobody thought to do this from the get go.

VERDICT: Piece of shit Daniel raped his unconscious mother and IS a rapist. End of.
ChatGPT is an "unbiased" opinion? You do know that the A.I. responses to prompts are programmed by data annotators, don't you? And I know for a fact that these responses are severely limited in what is considered an "acceptable" response. In all honesty, I'm growing tired of this debate, and I'm not even sure it's worth having anymore. I'm not particularly a fan of Daniel's having sex with a sleeping Lana, but at the very least I thought we could have some semblance of rational discourse as it concerns rape, context, nuance, etc. But the responses here have primarily been emotionally charged. And you know what? That's okay. Because, I would assume that our investment in these comics are primarily emotional. (Personally I'd like to see how Lana reacts to it.) But in the end, we're just going to disagree. And I'm fine with disagreement. So as far as this, "Did Daniel rape Lana or not?" issue is concerned, consider my part in it over.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ivarr_993

MrD812

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2021
1,581
2,375
From what many can see, this thread has been taged accurately just by glancing over it.
Seriously, fact the author writes Rape Content doesn't take rocket science to see the obvious.
If it walks like a duck.........
 
  • Like
Reactions: _OBLIVION_
4.80 star(s) 5 Votes