And jerkingLol, people hate it,but still see and read comic
And jerkingLol, people hate it,but still see and read comic
I've always waited for leaks for id and it was my favorite comics and i was addicted and i learned it for many times seeing images photos, but for the first Time After spoiler of trile3 and seeing Daniel fucking his sleeping mom i swear i don't read the dialogues, i've like a blocking, i hope Daval will change this scenario in the next update, this update is nonsense and luck of imagination. Excuse my bad englishLol, people hate it,but still see and read comic
Anyone ?Can anyone share updated mega link of daval comics . Thanks
Thanks a lot manYeah sure, here's the link:You must be registered to see the links
well Daval really has to make lots of cavers because TO parts 7,8,9 , SN 13, 14 and ID 11,12 doesn't have it so he really needs to make almost one update only for coversAny news on the ID11 cover?
And what about the ID12 cover?
I'm sorry, what? When did I give the idea I care about this whatsoever? Facts are simply facts and all I did was state them. The law isn't arbitrary like a "hypothetical" emir's decree, it's built on principles of consent and harm prevention, universally recognized in modern legal systems.Hence the term must be qualified using the modifier, "legally." It adds nothing more to an argument than a statement like, "The Emir of Qatar has declared that my touching a female's hand is considered sexual assault." Can we really state as a people that arbitrary statutes should take precedence over the preferences of the involved parties? There's no context in which this can be considered other than opinion. And the only opinions that matter are Daval's, expressed through his characters. That is, if Lana has allowed her son to impose on her personal space and has affirmed his discretion to do this at will, then that's all that matters. If you want to state, "in my country, that's considered rape..." you're more than welcome to. That however is not even as remotely as important as what Lana, and by proxy Daval, considers it.
And I think you've done a service by pointing out the legal considerations for statutory rape, because I do know for a fact that a number of those who are condemning Daniel's actions actively seek out Daval's V.I.P. content where the male characters are below the age of consent, thereby constituting, as you put it, "legal rape." So, it's kind of surprising, well... not so much, to see this "selective outrage" especially when it's based on a no less arbitrary description of rape.
Motherfucker, am I a joke to you?Just back to cut through the ridiculous amount of post facto bullshit and opinion hereabouts about rape. For an unbiased, definitive and accurate legal opinion I asked ChatGPT the following question:
"If a man has sex with a woman while she is unconscious, even if she gave him permission to do so while awake, would he be guilty of rape."
And ChatGPT's verdict was:
"Yes, in most legal systems, having sex with an unconscious person is considered rape, even if that person gave prior consent while conscious.
Here’s why:
1. Consent must be ongoing and conscious
2. Legal precedent and case law
- Most modern legal definitions of consent require it to be informed, voluntary, and continuous.
- Consent given ahead of time cannot override the fact that the person is unconscious and unable to revoke or modify that consent during the act.
- A person must have the ability to change their mind at any time — something an unconscious person cannot do.
3. Ethical considerations
- Courts in many jurisdictions have ruled that prior consent does not legalize sexual acts performed while the person is incapacitated.
- Even if someone says "you can have sex with me later when I'm asleep," that does not make it lawful, because they are not actively consenting at the time of the act.
Exception (rare and legally complex)
- Apart from the legal aspect, there are serious moral and ethical issues with engaging in sex with someone who cannot participate, respond, or withdraw consent.
In some committed relationships, particularly in cases where both partners have agreed to very specific and legally documented sexual boundaries (e.g., within some kink contexts), courts might take that into account — but even then, many legal systems still prohibit unconscious sex outright, regardless of prior agreement.
Summary: Yes, even if the woman gave permission while awake, sex with her while unconscious is almost certainly considered rape under the law in most jurisdictions. Consent must be active and ongoing, and unconscious people cannot legally or ethically provide it."
You can check this out by asking the AI the same question yourself; I really don't know why nobody thought to do this from the get go and settle the matter. I would have done so myself earlier but was otherwise occupied with work.
VERDICT: Daniel raped his unconscious mother and IS piece of shit rapist. End of.
You're welcome.![]()
If you say so.I'm sorry, what? When did I give the idea I care about this whatsoever? Facts are simply facts and all I did was state them. The law isn't arbitrary like a "hypothetical" emir's decree, it's built on principles of consent and harm prevention, universally recognized in modern legal systems.
There is no "objective" harm in this matter, when it concerns the behavior of two subjects, i.e. Daniel and Lana. Everyone is a subject in their own lives and the subjects of their own actions; hence, there is no objectivity. It may make you feel better to think that your statements are divorced from how you feel by citing "law" but all law is, whether arbitrary and/or "universally recognized" is a collection of feelings.Lana's "permission" in a fictional context doesn't override the reality that unconscious people can't consent, and minors can't legally consent to adults, especially not parents. This isn't about Daval's opinion, it's about objective harm, statutory rape, incest, and non-consensual acts are crimes for good reason.
Wrong. I haven't equated them at all. In fact, my argument has been trying to reinforce that the priority of personal preferences takes precedence over legal description especially as it concerns two or more parties decisions in sex.Equating personal preferences to legal and ethical standards is a false equivalence that ignores real-world consequences.
Once again, you're trying to have your cake and eat it, too. And my opinion on this matter is as relevant as anyone else's not named Daval. The only people trying to have a dispute over legal definition are the ones who feel as though it would provide an authority to how they feel. Newsflash: it doesn't. The law has no moral priority over how a person chooses to behave their own body. Repeating what the law states is no different than stating "this person said this..." Hence, my Emir anecdote.Hence why he's on Subscribestar and not Patreon because Subscribestar doesn't enforce many laws on cartoons because they are cartoons, but doesn't change what this is, which is: rape. His opinion as well as yours are irrelevant due to the laws of the place where the game is provided, and it's not Qatar. "Dura lex, sed lex".
"Marital rape"? Daniel and Lana aren't married. And the term rape doesn't need a modifier.Now, while some countries in Asia and Africa may not criminalize marital rape, every nation in Europe, the Americas, and Oceania would call you wrong.
But you're going to try...I'm not saying some regions are inherently better
Called it.and the others are savages who stone homosexuals and value cows over women,
The protections for "consent" especially in the countries you've listed does everything but service autonomy. If you can have a law that states that a person cannot provide consent to an act even if they've done so before, or after the fact, then autonomy is already out of the window. It's more so about protecting the image and interests of the legislation.but the contrast in legal protections for consent and autonomy speaks for itself.
Once again, you're proverbially speaking from one side of your mouth and another. If it's "just cartoons" then why not leave your statement at that? Why did you feel it necessary to regurgitate a legal description of rape? For "objectivity's" sake? Are you under the impression that I don't know what "legal rape" is? Or is it just my disagreement that has fueled your desire to be "objective"? And I'm using the term objective facetiously here because no one seems to have an interest in owning their opinions. I am giving my opinion. And so are you no matter what authority you believe citing legal definition provides it.Regardless, it's fucking cartoons, who gives a shit?
My man is back in the work.. let's go..Daval on SSA:
News: It's finally over!
Hello people, it's finally over, after many months a big weight is leaving me, so now I can have almost 100% of my time in comics.
I know that for 7 or 8 months the dates of the updates have not been accurate because little by little more things in my life have appeared and have taken up my time and have given me a lot of stress, but in these last days those matters are over.
What I want now is to do an update every 3 days as I did before and publish the comics before the evening, and for that I will do the update one day before, I will finish it, but I will publish it the next day to have updates in reserve. Tomorrow I will start working on SN but I don't promise to publish it tomorrow, I will publish it on Friday and I will use that system for the other updates this month.
This month I will do the updates you see in the picture, but in June I will do every 3 or 2 days. Many have been supporting me for years and others have left, but I don't blame them, my mind was elsewhere: friends, family, girlfriends, my house, gym, and I had a disorganized life, but now I will have much more time.
Another thing is that every day I receive messages on Discord, Twitter, SubscribeStar, Boosty, etc. Messages of support, complaints, proposals to make collaborations with other artists, etc. and handling that alone is overwhelming, that's why it took a long time to respond, but now with more organization I will respond much faster.
Next month I'll be back with the cover contests and I'll do all the ones I'm missing. And I will also be able to fulfill to make commissions that I have dozens of people who have asked me for personalized pages.
Thank you for your support.
View attachment 4863255
Bro this is not in full hdYeah sure, here's the link:You must be registered to see the links
Bro this is not in full hd
No, it is not, the images are rescaled with AI from a lower resolution than the original.Yes it is, just downloaded to double check.
Oh I thought we were talking about resolution not whether or not some were upscaled, I mentioned that in another post I made with every chapter included. Should've said that, my bad. You're talking about pages 92-131 right?No, it is not, the images are rescaled with AI from a lower resolution than the original.
92-131. exactlyOh I thought we were talking about resolution not whether or not some were upscaled, I mentioned that in another post I made with every chapter included. Should've said that, my bad. You're talking about pages 92-131 right?