Comics Collection Pinup Daval3D Collection [2025-05-05] [Daval3D]

[potito.doz]

Daval on SSA:
News: It's finally over!
Hello people, it's finally over, after many months a big weight is leaving me, so now I can have almost 100% of my time in comics.

I know that for 7 or 8 months the dates of the updates have not been accurate because little by little more things in my life have appeared and have taken up my time and have given me a lot of stress, but in these last days those matters are over.
What I want now is to do an update every 3 days as I did before and publish the comics before the evening, and for that I will do the update one day before, I will finish it, but I will publish it the next day to have updates in reserve. Tomorrow I will start working on SN but I don't promise to publish it tomorrow, I will publish it on Friday and I will use that system for the other updates this month.

This month I will do the updates you see in the picture, but in June I will do every 3 or 2 days. Many have been supporting me for years and others have left, but I don't blame them, my mind was elsewhere: friends, family, girlfriends, my house, gym, and I had a disorganized life, but now I will have much more time.

Another thing is that every day I receive messages on Discord, Twitter, SubscribeStar, Boosty, etc. Messages of support, complaints, proposals to make collaborations with other artists, etc. and handling that alone is overwhelming, that's why it took a long time to respond, but now with more organization I will respond much faster.

Next month I'll be back with the cover contests and I'll do all the ones I'm missing. And I will also be able to fulfill to make commissions that I have dozens of people who have asked me for personalized pages.

Thank you for your support.
View attachment 4863255
[/QUOTE What I want now is to do an update every 3 days as I did before and publish the comics before the evening, and for that I will do the update one day before, I will finish it, but I will publish it the next day to have updates in reserve. Tomorrow I will start working on SN but I don't promise to publish it tomorrow, I will publish it on Friday and I will use that system for the other updates this month.]
I stopped being a sub (and went thru Lana withdrawal) 'cuz of the unreliability from Daval3D, but I'd sign up again if I could just take his (probably sincerely meant) statement seriously. He's a very talented guy who's also a chronic procrastinator. Since I'm also a C.P., I can speak from some experience here: he hasn't yet recognized that this is a big part of his makeup. WANTS to do the right thing, but needs actual help to defeat it. WORST thing a ** can do is make a big to-do list and 'commit' to doing it ASAP. The big list shortly becomes something to DREAD, and that's a powerful reason to pause, get distracted by sumthin you'd LIKE to do and lose sight of responsibilities ranging from little errands to big projects. He needs a coach to keep reminding him every day of what MUST be done vs. what he's wanting to do. A more realistic set of just 2 or 3 weekly steps to chipping away at his mountainous promises could build some momentum, & would be less dreadful – more likely to adhere to for more than once or twice in a row. I would be happy to see him prove me wrong – & I'll re-join if he does. History & probability say that – unless he gets help and constant, daily reminders – he probably won't.

 

[ToWhomItMayConcern69]

If you say so.

There is no "objective" harm in this matter, when it concerns the behavior of two subjects, i.e. Daniel and Lana. Everyone is a subject in their own lives and the subjects of their own actions; hence, there is no objectivity. It may make you feel better to think that your statements are divorced from how you feel by citing "law" but all law is, whether arbitrary and/or "universally recognized" is a collection of feelings.

And yes, Daval's opinion matters most. Why? Because he's both Lana and Daniel. He knows better than anyone how they feel, how they think, what they both accept and don't accept, and what they can or can't consent to. You can't have it both ways: don't argue that Daval's portrayals are divorced from what you deem as "reality" and then react as though they were tied to what you deem as "reality."

Wrong. I haven't equated them at all. In fact, my argument has been trying to reinforce that the priority of personal preferences takes precedence over legal description especially as it concerns two or more parties decisions in sex.

Once again, you're trying to have your cake and eat it, too. And my opinion on this matter is as relevant as anyone else's not named Daval. The only people trying to have a dispute over legal definition are the ones who feel as though it would provide an authority to how they feel. Newsflash: it doesn't. The law has no moral priority over how a person chooses to behave their own body. Repeating what the law states is no different than stating "this person said this..." Hence, my Emir anecdote.

And as far as the differences between Patreon and Subscribestar, you're only making my point on how depictions being "okay" here, and not "there" is just arbitrary.

"Marital rape"? Daniel and Lana aren't married. And the term rape doesn't need a modifier.

But you're going to try...

Called it.

The protections for "consent" especially in the countries you've listed does everything but service autonomy. If you can have a law that states that a person cannot provide consent to an act even if they've done so before, or after the fact, then autonomy is already out of the window. It's more so about protecting the image and interests of the legislation.

Once again, you're proverbially speaking from one side of your mouth and another. If it's "just cartoons" then why not leave your statement at that? Why did you feel it necessary to regurgitate a legal description of rape? For "objectivity's" sake? Are you under the impression that I don't know what "legal rape" is? Or is it just my disagreement that has fueled your desire to be "objective"? And I'm using the term objective facetiously here because no one seems to have an interest in owning their opinions. I am giving my opinion. And so are you no matter what authority you believe citing legal definition provides it.

If you want to have a REAL debate about laws, morals, and ethics, feel free to message me.

With that said, I only entertained this post because I thought it only fair to hear you out given that I was the one who quoted you. But I meant what I said, I've grown tired of this discussion. This has taken up way too many pages, and consumed so much time. And I'm sure it's only a matter of time before some of these posts here are "cleaned up" so I won't waste more time beating a dead horse.

You're wrong, and it's quite funny that you think you're not.

There is no objective harm? This is moral relativism taken to the extreme. You're arguing that because everyone is a "subject", objectivity doesn't exist, which is both philosophically lazy and factually wrong.

Laws exist precisely because we live in a society of individuals with differing values. Harm is measurable: trauma, power imbalance, coercion, and inability to consent are not "feelings", they are legal and psychological realities. Not all laws are just a collection of feelings. Saying so is like claiming that murder laws are based purely on emotion. While morality may be subjective to some extent, law is codified consensus, and in this context, it exists to protect vulnerable parties.

Daval is not Lana and Daniel. That is why you cannot make a disclaimer saying "these characters are just acting because I said so", or "they're pretending to be family but they're not", or "this character looks like a minor but she's actually a thousand-year-old vampire" and then place them in scenes involving blackmail, coercion, and rape across various platforms, not just Patreon, but Pornhub for instance and half the internet. Because it is illegal. When the law changes, you can let your moral or ethical compass guide your reaction to such content, but until then, the law is the law.

A minor-looking character is a minor-looking character. Rape is rape. Even if Lana is awake and pretending to be asleep, or even if she says it was fine afterward, there's a legal principle called "mens rea", the guilty mind, and "actus reus", the guilty act. If Daniel believes Lana is asleep, even if she is secretly awake and consenting, the fact that he thinks she is unconscious means he believes he is committing rape. That belief fulfills the mens rea component in many legal systems. The act itself fulfills the actus reus. Therefore, it is illegal. Immoral? Up to you, it's a cartoon, but it's unequivocally illegal.

Retroactive consent does not undo a non-consensual act. This is well-established across all credible legal systems.

You're trying to moralize something that is, in every jurisdiction that matters, both immoral and illegal. You can argue subjectivity all you want, but that does not hold up in law, in ethics, or in decent society.

I'm done here, honestly, and I don't understand why they would "clean it up" when we're just discussing the work in a very civilized way.

By the way, you didn't "call" anything. You simply read ahead. It was obvious I was leading into it, it's called sarcasm. Yes, the western culture is objectively and subjectively superior. How? For instance, human rights, personal freedoms, and legal protections. If your moral framework values consent, equality, freedom, and protection from abuse, then Western culture, broadly speaking, is superior in delivering those outcomes. If it doesn't, well, shame on you.

 

[8TB]

You're wrong, and it's quite funny that you think you're not.

There is no objective harm? This is moral relativism taken to the extreme. You're arguing that because everyone is a "subject", objectivity doesn't exist, which is both philosophically lazy and factually wrong.

Laws exist precisely because we live in a society of individuals with differing values. Harm is measurable: trauma, power imbalance, coercion, and inability to consent are not "feelings", they are legal and psychological realities. Not all laws are just a collection of feelings. Saying so is like claiming that murder laws are based purely on emotion. While morality may be subjective to some extent, law is codified consensus, and in this context, it exists to protect vulnerable parties.

Daval is not Lana and Daniel. That is why you cannot make a disclaimer saying "these characters are just acting because I said so", or "they're pretending to be family but they're not", or "this character looks like a minor but she's actually a thousand-year-old vampire" and then place them in scenes involving blackmail, coercion, and rape across various platforms, not just Patreon, but Pornhub for instance and half the internet. Because it is illegal. When the law changes, you can let your moral or ethical compass guide your reaction to such content, but until then, the law is the law.

A minor-looking character is a minor-looking character. Rape is rape. Even if Lana is awake and pretending to be asleep, or even if she says it was fine afterward, there's a legal principle called "mens rea", the guilty mind, and "actus reus", the guilty act. If Daniel believes Lana is asleep, even if she is secretly awake and consenting, the fact that he thinks she is unconscious means he believes he is committing rape. That belief fulfills the mens rea component in many legal systems. The act itself fulfills the actus reus. Therefore, it is illegal. Immoral? Up to you, it's a cartoon, but it's unequivocally illegal.

Retroactive consent does not undo a non-consensual act. This is well-established across all credible legal systems.

You're trying to moralize something that is, in every jurisdiction that matters, both immoral and illegal. You can argue subjectivity all you want, but that does not hold up in law, in ethics, or in decent society.

I'm done here, honestly, and I don't understand why they would "clean it up" when we're just discussing the work in a very civilized way.

By the way, you didn't "call" anything. You simply read ahead. It was obvious I was leading into it, it's called sarcasm. Yes, the western culture is objectively and subjectively superior. How? For instance, human rights, personal freedoms, and legal protections.

I appreciate your input. Any further discussion on this matter with me should be taken to private messages. I'm not invested enough to continue this, here.

 

[apocalipsis666]

what the hell just happening to uncle peter

 

[_OBLIVION_]

SN 14 preview pages 61 - 70 so this is going to be the threesome Daval talked about a while ago?...

You must be registered to see the links

 

[xdddddd20233]

ID??

 

[Trile3]

SN14

Spoiler: Pages 61-70

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[MEFANBOY]

SN14

Spoiler: Pages 61-70

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

So Alexa had a threesome with Emma and Lennon?
I'll have see it first to believe because Daval always fails to deliver.

 

[Trile3]

So Alexa had a threesome with Emma and Lennon?
I'll have see it first to believe because Daval always fails to deliver.

In last picure Lennon and Emma are laying naked,it looks like asleep on bed.Alexa started kissing Emma and then Daval skip whole sex scene (if there was one).Did she engage in 3 some,drug them or she just encorage dad/daughter sex while interogating Lennon is unclear

 

[mickeymcd30]

Oh, that was very interesting. Many will be eager to know what happened and what will happen. Good move by Daval.

 

[mickeymcd30]

Yummy!

 

[MEFANBOY]

View attachment 4870959
Yummy!

Old image. This scene already took place.

 

[YoYleboss]

In last picure Lennon and Emma are laying naked,it looks like asleep on bed.Alexa started kissing Emma and then Daval skip whole sex scene (if there was one).Did she engage in 3 some,drug them or she just encorage dad/daughter sex while interogating Lennon is unclear

Daval told me in a private message that Amanda and Alexa wouldn’t have any sexual relations with another man besides Liam. Let’s see if he keeps his word or not, considering this ambiguous scene.

 

[_OBLIVION_]

In last picure Lennon and Emma are laying naked,it looks like asleep on bed.Alexa started kissing Emma and then Daval skip whole sex scene (if there was one).Did she engage in 3 some,drug them or she just encorage dad/daughter sex while interogating Lennon is unclear

Holy shit one job , so he left the scene ambiguous why Daval is such a coward IS A FUCKING PORN COMIC , Alexa wanted information Mr Lennon after watching her french kissing Emma gets horny and ask her to get naked and join them in exchange for information, Alexa accepts boom sex scene easily .

Daval told me in a private message that Amanda and Alexa wouldn’t have any sexual relations with another man besides Liam. Let’s see if he keeps his word or not, considering this ambiguous scene.

I understand Amanda but Alexa too? are you fucking kidding me what a way to ruin a character, so what's the point of the little fat fuck just there blue balled af (maybe he's based of his purist subs) damn he's lame af...

 

[YoYleboss]

I understand Amanda but Alexa too? are you fucking kidding me what a way to ruin a character, so what's the point of the little fat fuck just there blue balled af (maybe he's based of his purist subs) damn he's lame af...

He told me he had made a vote

 

[_OBLIVION_]

View attachment 4870959
Yummy!

Not the first time Daval use an already published page as a preview , wtf is wrong with him lol.

He told me he had made a vote

If that's true oh boy so another character wasted because of the subs the most interesting one of the comic , what a sell out...

 

[King of Paradise]

11:50pi 24may25
Bah Gawd,
Minors,old pedos abusing younger ones mentality inducing,

being the darkie cookie of comics on milking fans,

with the amount of fans waging against each other,
only such can be done by greedy,masterclass,
Politicians,Government agents,Private MNCs would do,

I remember roaming around sexkomix & gone through Mandologica work,
got to Daval,SN,

since then,

Guy is *farming the negative reactions,of people & manipulators into levels,only elite politicians can do,
Trumpunk of Comics..*
stop the engage,time to give the appreciation to others,which stolen by greedy "pick me" street thing(daval),
and brave to question shame those supporting the pedos as pedos..

all be well..
11:56/7pi

Continue,02:59pi

And regarding minors,its only about similar age,

If its about with Adult (or even worse elder),
Such damage nearly permanently would last longer in mental trauma,even more that,even sickly greed would feel worry for such souls,

And to that,compared Adults with minors scenario,

Adults know,treat porn as entertainment & leaving,
Minors are having many worse cases(not just mostly,nearly all) so they're precautionary grown well from such abyss,

And to those Elders,Seniors abusing younger ones(regardless of adults or minors),

Its not entertainment pursue,

But its a pattern,
Pattern if behaviours,

Those who endure,encourage such acts,
Regardless of age,preferences,story or vanilla,troll execuses,

Remember,to be wise,
To be safe,
I pray everyone to be safe,who may come around them,
Cause,

Such Behavioral Patterns only shows one thing,
Those are vile,inhumane,manipulative,narcissitic,rape & even worse sins,

That doesn't let such be termed in human sins scales(as they can't be considered humans or any beings anymore),

To be precisely clear,
Psychopaths,
Even Sociopaths,

Who only cares about themselves,gains from every others,abusing lives,
Regardless of factors they derive drive on,money or lust,
Those are objects,goals,
"Control" to them,

Reagrdless of how much "kinks",sexual preferences one play,

As adults,for lack of love interests,life in general(which echoes globally cause of reasons like economic to many),

Even porn is not some execuse for such monsters,
But rather some clickbaits to them,
"Normalizing themselves",

03:07pm

Please look at "old ones preying on young ones,usually leads to minors being abused",

Its a vicious cycle,chain,if torments,

So if you ever comes across someone,who is actually encourages such acts of "Elders powerplay over younger ones,anything as sexual,even normal life",

Beware of such,
No much of vicinty can save such,

They won't accept medical/psychology counseling help,
But feel happy to ruin other's minds to lives,

For summary:
To consume porn,one has to have knowledge of internet(though availability,its still factors of growing up,many can be grown well by little parenting,guidance)

Adults -> knows,treats it's an Entertainment & moves on,doesn't mix up life to ruin,highly matured by age,

Minors -> high risk of mental to physical abuses(even just by consumption,such complex thoughts takes toll on one's mental endurance),wise is to follow already norm of growing up,

Senior Elders -> those who consume,regardless of age,is rare,as many become wise,+so possibly 0th to none,(and they only reminisce the life,keen on memories making,world,than any indulgence)+

Seniors abuse younger ones --=> these are vile psychopaths,who should be reported,treated as PEDOs regardless of online consumptions,internet spending,ss they may or not indulge in such activities,eventually they incense such vile ones,

Simple as that,

Dear mods,
PLEASE TREAT THE ABOVE WORDS AS SOME MEASURE & TAKE CARE WORLD WELL,

Afterall,we humans as social beings,social animals,still need to be taught often,that's how we are civilized,

Vile ones may pose intelligence,to abuse other's lives,but beware,

Hope such wordse reach others,
Pardon for length,but message has to be spread,

Wise understanding glad,
Wish all be well by nature ✨
03:16/7pm ist 21may25

 

[_OBLIVION_]

Satisfying Needs 14 Pages 61 - 70 LQ retarded translation

Daval just skipped the best part, he loves to be boring at this point ONE FUCKING JOB did Alexa watched them fucking until they passed out or what, wtf is this lame lazy scene seriously...

 

[King of Paradise]

Hey _OBLIVION_ are you in US?

just asking..

i have seen you around in other threads too...

are you a 70s born? (pardon me mods,just like to talk with knowing the preferences here,doesnt need to be personal)
12:00/1a25may25

sd ed 12:03a
btw right when i click enter,f95 load 20 seconds popup & you put one,what a pirate

 

[_OBLIVION_]

Hey _OBLIVION_ are you in US?

just asking..

i have seen you around in other threads too...

are you a 70s born? (pardon me mods,just like to talk with knowing the preferences here,doesnt need to be personal)
12:00/1a25may25

sd ed 12:03a
btw right when i click enter,f95 load 20 seconds popup & you put one,what a pirate

What kind of bot are you