"If there's any questions as to their blood relation, then that can be clarified after the fact" this right here makes the difference, people use nephew generalizing the term just to not explain the fact that a person aint blood related and to save time because lazyness, they will clarify the fact only if somebody ask them, everybody does that and is nothing new on society.
It's not because of laziness, per se, though that can't be ruled out. It's a means of integrating the descriptions. The notion of "blood relation" naturally comes up in subjects of incest, but not generally. In other words, it may be important to those of us who read incest comics where pleasure is derived from consanguinity, but as far as the subject of family, blood relationships as well as legal relationships are streamlined with single terms.
Again my point stands that Martha isnt that little fella aunt, is her husband nephew, son of his sister.
No, your point doesn't stand. His uncle's wife is, by definition,
his aunt. Just like how Alice and David refer to Luke, Sarah's husband, as "uncle Luke" and not "uncle-in-law Luke."
Nephew in law is the specific term in this case in her side only,
It "can" be, but generally is not the case.
she can say just nephew all she wants but she knows damn well is basically for courtesy and not by blood
Because "nephew" doesn't necessarily signify blood relation.
thats what matters at the end, if she divorce from her husband the nephew thing is over for her not for Steve.
This is categorically false. If Martha divorces her husband, she would still be the mother of John's cousin, which by definition, would make her John's
aunt.
Martha specified the fact to the girls to avoid confusion, is right there in the pic.
Yes, she specified which side of the family the term nephew was being applied, she did not however
negate the fact that he was her nephew.
Again, what's the argument, here? I stated that Martha gave her nephew a blowjob, and you sought to clarify an unnecessary qualification. You know they're not blood related; I know they're not blood related. The term I applied can be employed in circumstances where John is her sibling's son
OR John is her spouse's sibling's son, which in this case is true through her husband Steve. So what are you trying to correct?
Who the fuck cares about Martha and her nephew?
I must admit that this is perhaps one of the the most fascinating, yet pointless exchanges I've ever had. I suppose that's inevitable in discussions over lexicon and semantics.
I also think the fact that he isn't blood related is relevant to the plot, because it's easier to digest for Lana and her friends, imagine this story starting with Martha revealing that she commits blood-related incest, but since it's her husband's nephew it's not as immoral.
I would agree with that.
Anyway, I care more about Martha's son, someone who was mentioned once but never showed up, not even during this whole arc in his house, he's the reason I wish it was Martha and not Sofia the one who find out about Lana and Daniel, Sofia and Rosa seems to be younger than Lana and Martha, they may not even have kids.
Rosa mentions having a son in chapter five of Immoral Desires, when Daniel surprises Lana at the supermarket. As far as Martha's son, I personally hope he stays out of the picture. It would be difficult to glean any meaning in a tryst between he and his mother since it would appear her intent is solely to get-off, whether it's with her nephew, his friend, or Daniel. It would just be sex with her son, just to show her having sex with her son. Then again, I'm not at all invested in Martha even as a character, so that may be coming into play here.
I mean it’s not denying the reality or breaking any established chapters with untrue message that Lana and Daniel don’t care about each other or that they wont end up together. I don’t really see how these physical changes you proposed somehow correlates with new lover out of jealousy as love makes people jealous.
Jealousy also stems from a sense of propriety; Jealousy also stems from proprietary notions; it's not just that Daniel is jealous because he loves his mom. He's jealous because he want her to be his. He's already jealous of his father (Oedipus Complex); giving Lana multiple lovers would make Daniel what? Jealous squared? It makes no sense.
I‘m not saying Daniel will enjoy Sophia cuz let’s be honest who would? she looks like de aged grandma, but he will fuck her probably, since she found out.
Then why would Daniel prioritize Sofia over his mother, driving Lana into the arms of a neighbor's son, as you suggested before? And though I can't be sure of the contact Sofia and Daniel will have after Sofia discovers his sexual relationship with his mother, Daval's message appeared to be an attempt to put out the fire ignited by the ire of the majority of the fan base, who's against the idea of Sofia being involved with Daniel sexually.
And how does Lana and Sophia being friends matter like really? These are Daval porn comics the only things that drive characters in his stories are lust, horniness, not logic or loyalty to their husbands or friends. Sophia wanted to fuck Lana’s son since she only had suspicion he has a big dick, where is logic or loyalty to her friend in there.
Of course it matters. If Sofia didn't care about her friendship with Lana, she would have fucked Daniel then and there at the pool when he was massaging her. Why is Sofia sneaking around behind Lana's back trying to have sex with Daniel? Daniel is presumably an adult; Sofia is presumably an adult. Sofia's sneaking around as a reconciliation between her sexual frustration and her friendship with Lana. She doesn't want to offend Lana by having sex with her son, so she decided to conspire with Martha to have sex with Daniel while keeping Lana in the dark. One can't just make up rules and not be observant because "it's a porn comic."
It is a change of pace if you want to call it otherwise that is up to you.
No, it's just a change, or as Jack_Zy would put it, "cutting out the thread, and replacing it with a new one."
Now about the future of ID like i said nothing interesting comes into play, unless you’re into the whole let’s run away and get secretly married types of stories. But dragging taking off ring only goes so far, not to mention Daval purposely drags stories a lot without progressing most of the time only to generate new issues and sex scenes, again not a problem but saying that there is a lot he will do with characters seems unlikely.
I'm into what it purports to be, and that's a mother-son incest comic. I never said that there's a lot he can do. Just like there isn't much a pizzeria can do outside of pizza. I'm not going in there and asking for burgers. Those who enjoy the mother-son incest theme seldom care about how long it drags out, because they're engaged for the mother-son theme itself, not just the sex, which in itself isn't enhanced when the scope of sexual partners is expanded.
So i don’t really see problem with the story that Lana loves Daniel and vice verse, Sophia finds out and she could take a picture of them for blackmailing and since she wanted to fuck him for like three chapters now he’ll have to do it to not get exposed and protect Lana, Sophia will enjoy it and probably ask for Daniel a lot more after, Lana being the person she is would develop jealousy over time and feeling lonely and like a failed lover to both husband and Daniel would only give opening to someone else, for example a neighbor kid, but Daniel would fight for her and prove how much he loves her again which would turn Lana back after getting rid of Sophia and other person, so they would still end up together.
You may think this makes sense considering everything that has happened up to this point, but it really doesn't. It just seems to be a contrived way to have Lana and Daniel have different sexual partners temporarily for reasons (?) while attempting to placate Lana and Daniel fans by the end of it. You're trying to have your cake and eat it, too. This is almost similar to what Daval did with uncle Peter in Madness Together. That is, have Sarah have a temporary tryst with her uncle only to then drive her back into David's arms. But here's the thing, Madness Together's story is a mess, and the fans are still pissed at Daval to this day for Uncle Peter's inclusion. Why would Daval risk doing something similar in Immoral Desires?
I ask once again, why attempt to shoehorn nonsensical plots? Why not just come out and state, "I don't want Immoral Desires to be just about Daniel and Lana having sex"?
If you don’t like this or in general are not in favor of other people involved, understandable and i respect that,
I made it no secret that, at least as far as Immoral Desires is concerned, that I'd like for the sex to remain between Daniel and Lana. But that's not the reason I state that your scenario doesn't make sense. Your scenario completely disregards everything that has happened up unto this point; it disregards Daniel's obvious sentiments toward Lana in comparison to other women with whom he has had contact; it disregards Lana's sense of propriety; it disregards Sofia's friendship with Lana. It appears just to be a means to an end; that is, in order to see Lana and Daniel have sex with other people, let's have Sofia blackmail her, even though Sofia is supposed to be her friend; let's have Daniel be obsessed with Sofia, even though she's not as attractive as Lana; let's have Lana have sex with a neighbor's kid just to occupy her time while Daniel is obsessing over Sofia; and then let's bring Daniel and Lana back together by the end of it, and not question the reason they had to have sex with other people during their temporary separation which happened because of "reasons," and claim that it's a path to love through jealousy even though the jealous angle has already been explored in Chapter 8.
On the other note Rosa is smoking hot so Daval could use her instead, since it would be waste to use someone like Martha and Sophia but not her. Did we see Rosa naked? Like in other material.
On this, we agree. I don't think Rosa has appeared naked in any of Daval's content. We haven't even seen her in a swimsuit. The closest we've come in seeing Rosa's body was in chapter three, I believe, when she sported nightwear when spending the night at Lana's:
And note that Daniel didn't give Rosa a second thought despite her appearance, other than the fact that her presence was inconvenient in his advances toward his mother.
