3D-Daz Daz3d Art - Show Us Your DazSkill

[Mescalino]

Bundle comes with a character Alabama who has a lot of potential. Anyone game to give her a shot?

SHE is A M A Z I N G
So yes as soon as i have her she will be in a render. Hopefully this weekend i have time to play with her. Just thinking on which direction i will go. Want to do something nice and special.

 

[recreation]

View attachment 225091
The Heroine.

Pure of heart, ever vigilant and valiant.
She wandered the wilds, and slew many a villain.
A virtuous virgin, like ivory her tender body shines in the autumn eve.

That is, until one day...





View attachment 225092
She wandered into the wrong dungeon. Mine.




​

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

looks great! Dont mind the shadows, most people wont even notice them (yeah i know, i know)

 

[Nomec104]

So i've made a render test for my scene with an emissive sphere behind and slightly above the camera (as @Xavster suggested) plus an hdri dome. But the result is not what i hoped for, i might make some more test/pre-render until i get something better

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

As always tips and corrections are welcomed

 

[kaboomer69]

looks great! Dont mind the shadows, most people wont even notice them (yeah i know, i know)

Thanks, yes I think you are right - there are many things that artists obsess about which the viewers usually don't notice.
Although my experience tells me that, even when I don't notice something directly, it can lead to the whole image being off. Photorealism is about the small inconspicious details, after all.

I also look at my images over and over again to analyze them, and there is a growing list of details that seem to be missing.
For example:

• saliva dripping from her gagged mouth and forming a little puddle on the floor
• sweat on the body (already used a geoshell but removed for the render)
• spanking marks on the buttocks
• the fists don't look clenched enough
• etc.

So i've made a render test for my scene with an emissive sphere behind and slightly above the camera (as @Xavster suggested) plus an hdri dome. But the result is not what i hoped for, i might make some more test/pre-render until i get something better

As always tips and corrections are welcomed

I think

You must be registered to see the links

has some good tips exactly for your issue.

Just bewarned, these videos are extremely annoying to watch. The author is not prepared at all, doesn't cut the videos, there's even the GPU cooler humming in the background.
In competition against any halfway decent YouTubers he would have no chance. Lots of good information though.

 

[brynhildr]

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Personally speaking, her expression it's not really that interesting/beautiful/or whatever you wanna choose. But every other that I tried, ended up being a disaster for this model

 

[Techn0magier]

So i've made a render test for my scene with an emissive sphere behind and slightly above the camera (as @Xavster suggested) plus an hdri dome. But the result is not what i hoped for, i might make some more test/pre-render until i get something better

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

As always tips and corrections are welcomed

A general Tip for lighting:
A lightsource always should fullfill at least one purpose, like removing or creating a shadow, seperating objects etc.
A good exercise would be "The Egg". Place an egg or sphere in a dark room and then hit it with a single lightsource from different directions for a render (N/NW/W/SW/S/SE/E/NE). This will show you, what light will do in general, when it hits an object. When they are using HDRI, a lot of people consider them as at least two different light sources, in this case, pretty much like an outdoor photoshoot (direct sunlight and environmental fill light).

When I need a key or effect light at the place near the camera, I use a thorus and center the camera in its middle. This way I got more control over shadows and directions.

 

[recreation]

So i've made a render test for my scene with an emissive sphere behind and slightly above the camera (as @Xavster suggested) plus an hdri dome. But the result is not what i hoped for, i might make some more test/pre-render until i get something better

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

As always tips and corrections are welcomed

I'd try to play a bit with the exposure value in the render settings and use a soft light with low intensity instead of a emission sphere.

 

[Nomec104]

I think

You must be registered to see the links

has some good tips exactly for your issue.

Just bewarned, these videos are extremely annoying to watch. The author is not prepared at all, doesn't cut the videos, there's even the GPU cooler humming in the background.
In competition against any halfway decent YouTubers he would have no chance. Lots of good information though.

A general Tip for lighting:
A lightsource always should fullfill at least one purpose, like removing or creating a shadow, seperating objects etc.
A good exercise would be "The Egg". Place an egg or sphere in a dark room and then hit it with a single lightsource from different directions for a render (N/NW/W/SW/S/SE/E/NE). This will show you, what light will do in general, when it hits an object. When they are using HDRI, a lot of people consider them as at least two different light sources, in this case, pretty much like an outdoor photoshoot (direct sunlight and environmental fill light).

When I need a key or effect light at the place near the camera, I use a thorus and center the camera in its middle. This way I got more control over shadows and directions.

I'd try to play a bit with the exposure value in the render settings and use a soft light with low intensity instead of a emission sphere.

Ty guys for the tips, i really apreciate it. I'm a newbie here and i know pratically nothing about professional photography.

 

[recreation]

Thanks, yes I think you are right - there are many things that artists obsess about which the viewers usually don't notice.
Although my experience tells me that, even when I don't notice something directly, it can lead to the whole image being off. Photorealism is about the small inconspicious details, after all.

You're totally right, missing a small detail can ruin the whole image. I'm not better though, I usually spend more time fixing small things than creating the scene itself.

btw shes missing ankle cuffs with a pole between them (how is this called again?)

 

[Techn0magier]

Thanks, yes I think you are right - there are many things that artists obsess about which the viewers usually don't notice.
Although my experience tells me that, even when I don't notice something directly, it can lead to the whole image being off. Photorealism is about the small inconspicious details, after all.

I also look at my images over and over again to analyze them, and there is a growing list of details that seem to be missing.
For example:

• saliva dripping from her gagged mouth and forming a little puddle on the floor
• sweat on the body (already used a geoshell but removed for the render)
• spanking marks on the buttocks
• the fists don't look clenched enough
• etc.

So pretty much the thought process of every artist? Normally I'm proud of my work for a few hours, after that I start to nitpick on it, till I convinced myself that it is not even showable.

I think

You must be registered to see the links

has some good tips exactly for your issue.

Just bewarned, these videos are extremely annoying to watch. The author is not prepared at all, doesn't cut the videos, there's even the GPU cooler humming in the background.
In competition against any halfway decent YouTubers he would have no chance. Lots of good information though.

Dreamlight has a lot of interesting tutorials, sadly they closed their store at renderosity. But yeah the shorter ones from Val are mostly without a real thread. But in exchange he often has a project that he shows from start to finish, at the end of a series. That helps alot to undertand his gibberish in heinsight.

 

[recreation]

So pretty much the thought process of every artist? Normally I'm proud of my work for a few hours, after that I start to nitpick on it, till I convinced myself that it is not even showable.

That's totally me^^"

 

[kaboomer69]

You're totally right, missing a small detail can ruin the whole image. I'm not better though, I usually spend more time fixing small things than creating the scene itself.

btw shes missing ankle cuffs with a pole between them (how is this called again?)

Suspension Cuffs for G8F? All parts from that asset always failed to conform to G3F though, which I used for that scene.

Well she doesn't need that; she's a holy virgin so she actually wants "it" so desperately... her ass and pussy are wet and gaping for a reason

 

[recreation]

Suspension Cuffs for G8F? All parts from that asset always failed to conform to G3F though, which I used for that scene.

Well she doesn't need that; she's a holy virgin so she actually wants "it" so desperately... her ass and pussy are wet and gaping for a reason

A "spreader bar" was what I meant, but it's even better if she doesn't need it

 

[Xavster]

So i've made a render test for my scene with an emissive sphere behind and slightly above the camera (as @Xavster suggested) plus an hdri dome. But the result is not what i hoped for, i might make some more test/pre-render until i get something better

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

As always tips and corrections are welcomed

The lighting on the scene is fine, it really is a matter of what you are seeking to do. If you want harder shadows, you really need to change the HDRI for a point light source as your scene is missing 2 walls and a roof. Also if you want a hard shadow on the couch, reduce the size and increase the intensity of the emmissive light source and move it to the right of the camera.

To get the effect you want, most adjustments are changing position, direction and intensity of the light sources. Reading many information sources on lighting, whilst experimenting will only serve to improve your skills.

Note: With emmissive light sources the intensity is the amount of light emitted per unit of surface area. Hence large emmissive surfaces will emit more light than smaller ones at the same intensity.

 

[miramistin]

 

[kaboomer69]

Do you like smartphone-zombies?


___
BTW if anyone knows billboards for beach activities, let me know.

 

[Kendra Denimore]

how did you manage to make a full package Futa?

Futalicious, and the Roasty addon...

 

[shapersoul]

Got bored. Decided to experiment with lighting and shaders..

 

[zramcharan]

Futalicious, and the Roasty addon...

I have used Futaliscious. Roasty takes the scrotum away. Unless that is only in G8.

 

[mcmania]

Some rework here: I make the fishnet top clings more tightly to her, also changed slightly her facial morph but it is barely visible without direct comparison. I added blooming effect and also done some postwork on it...
EDIT (16/1): changed slightly her face morph + lowered her ponytail + the image is using EXR 32-bits beauty canvas as base for the postwork
View attachment 225422

Spoiler: previous version (using PNG 8-bit render as base for the postwork)

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Just make an update to my last render (updated the post) using the 32-bits beauty canvas as base of the postwork...