- Aug 31, 2017
- 592
- 712
Angelina Jolie with about 70 years?
Angelina Jolie with about 70 years?
So, in your case it was the quality settings you set that shorten the render time so much. Not the 'Max time (secs)' -10200 seconds are 170 minutes- and obviously not the 'Max samples' count you set either. However, it still does not make much sense to me. I mean, if you set 'Rendering Quality Enable' to On, my understanding is that by increasing the value of the 'Rendering quality' parameter you are putting the quality bar higher and hence making the render time longer. And you set it to 6, which is a high value. And my understanding of how the 'Rendering converged ratio' works from a practical point of view is similar: the higher you set it, the more time the rendering is gonna take. And you set it to 99 percent. And the size of your final renders does not look small either.Here's how I ran it...
I'm literally in the same boat, it makes zero sense. All the other settings are default.So, in your case it was the quality settings you set that shorten the render time so much. Not the 'Max time (secs)' -10200 seconds are 170 minutes- and obviously not the 'Max samples' count you set either. However, it still does not make much sense to me. I mean, if you set 'Rendering Quality Enable' to On, my understanding is that by increasing the value of the 'Rendering quality' parameter you are putting the quality bar higher and hence making the render time longer. And you set it to 6, which is a high value. And my understanding of how the 'Rendering converged ratio' works from a practical point of view is similar: the higher you set it, the more time the rendering is gonna take. And you set it to 99 percent. And the size of your final renders does not look small either.
What is it that I am missing here? Because I honestly can't understand how with those settings you completed that render under the 1-minute mark. With that said, I started rendering very recently and I don't enable 'Rendering Quality Enable' to make my renders, so it is highly likely that I am overlooking something important in your settings.
I'm rendering something else right now, same settings, different lights and scene.I'm literally in the same boat, it makes zero sense. All the other settings are default.
That one took 20 minutes.I'm rendering something else right now, same settings, different lights and scene.
Very nice work! Is your wife on here? Does she do any Daz artwork? Anyhow, nice of you two to join us.Hey ho,
first of all i would say you need to set your focus just a little bit more on the details in your pictures if you are rendering pictures in big resolutions like yours. The first thing i saw in this picture was the hair that is poking through the hand of the model, the second thing was the arm of the jacket on her left arm. The arm looks twisted and it seems like it's overlapping! Maybe you should play a bit with the mesh smoothing of the jacket to fix this problem.
No hate. I'm just being honest.
The lighting is good so far. This image is better than the most things i've seen in some Daz Groups on Facebook or Deviantart.
Just to be clear, i'm just a new member here. Joined today because of my wife. She told me about this page. I'm rendering since 2014.
Check them out. Here are two of them.
View attachment 2992961
View attachment 2992965
Really beautiful,Chapter 2 of Pecker PI now available on Patreon. Will upload here in less than 2 weeks. This is probably my favorite render of the chapter.
\ View attachment 2993967
Panam's ass is where the budget of CP77 went to lol
If you want to charge for this game, then you'd better find a better name than "procrastinator" (O:I'll try to get first demo out sometime this monthYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Just create the figure as you like her. You are the artist. FOr what it is worth, i like the pale oneLike what? I'm pretty new at all this.