crash.7ds

Active Member
Nov 18, 2018
926
789
No, but that's mainly because Vrel doesn't give out timelines as they tend to get messy when they inevitably get missed, even for legitimate reasons. This is why Vrel has waited this long to implement pregnancy mechanics. We''l have to keep checking back for it, but I'd honestly be surprised if we see it before the end of the month.
 

ladguru

Active Member
Oct 18, 2018
962
808
It is also surprisingly up-to-date considering how long the game has been going for and how frequently it updates.
The Wiki is really, really good. But there is still usually a lag of 3…6 months for current content. Which is still pretty amazing.

What bugs me, is that there are more and more pages which are littered with an obsessively detailed amount of content which is
a) absolutely confusing and unhelpful for someone who just seeks some orientation
b) is probably outdated with the very next update
c) was probably never really correct in the first place...
 

Fangii

Newbie
Aug 19, 2019
72
233
The Wiki is really, really good. But there is still usually a lag of 3…6 months for current content. Which is still pretty amazing.

What bugs me, is that there are more and more pages which are littered with an obsessively detailed amount of content which is
a) absolutely confusing and unhelpful for someone who just seeks some orientation
b) is probably outdated with the very next update
c) was probably never really correct in the first place...
Usually it's B, or just something that got tweaked ever so slightly. Skill checks are a prime example of that, they tend to get tweaked a lot. There has been some misinfo in the past, but it wasn't intentional, we were still discovering stuff, I remember the Fully Covered feat being a pain in that regard, lol. So much debate over how to obtain that one, and so much conflicting info. Nobody could agree on what did what, methods working for some people but not for others, etc etc.

Coders (like oyea) have worked on detailed pages like the Prison, so maybe that's where things are getting a bit lost in translation there, like if the page lists exact values taken from the code (but it's very rare for that to happen). Generally it shouldn't be confusing to read though and should act as something easy to follow. New content maybe being the exception because it's still new and again, the community needs time to go through it and find out everything about it. It's a community-run wiki afterall

I generally just tried to write the pages as detailed as I could when I was doing them without having to go in and look at the code and basically just write down content as I was playing through them. (see the Cafe Campaign and Underground Brothel pages for examples).
 
Last edited:

ladguru

Active Member
Oct 18, 2018
962
808
I generally just tried to write the pages as detailed as I could when I was doing them without having to go in and look at the code and basically just write down content as I was playing through them. (see the Cafe Campaign and Underground Brothel pages for examples).
"Cafe Campaign" and "Underground Brothel" are perfectly fine. Thanks btw!

But "Prison" is a really bad example. You cannot show that to someone who wants to learn about the game.
So much detail should be put on a separate you-dont-need-that-but-if-you-really-want-to-know page, IMHO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fangii and Furabia
4.50 star(s) 203 Votes