CK 3 sucks. HOI 4 has the same exact map, but with tanks and planes.You ought to start playing CK3 then, you'll be amazed!
CK 3 sucks. HOI 4 has the same exact map, but with tanks and planes.You ought to start playing CK3 then, you'll be amazed!
I would contend that it does, since monarchies of that era, and Egyptians in particular tended to be personality cults. And everybody wants to copy whoever's in charge.Whether rulers shaved themselves or not doesn't necessarily say much about what was popular in society at large.
that would be Queen Merneith.. but if Z as much as give her a stubble, I suspect a revolution would ensue.I would contend that it does, since monarchies of that era, and Egyptians in particular tended to be personality cults. And everybody wants to copy whoever's in charge.
As if that makes it any better, it's also irrelevent to my post. HOI 4 is a war-simulator that spans less than two decades. CK3 is dynasty-simulator that spans almost six centuries. You don't get to learn much about history in HOI 4, you do in CK3. Far more important however: You play characters in CK3. You can go crazy and restore ancient pagan religions or even better, go completely nuts and create your own incest/harem based religion and through multiple generations of inbreeding become something close to a god. Far more relevant for people who also enjoy this game, I would think.CK 3 sucks. HOI 4 has the same exact map, but with tanks and planes.
That's quite a stretch to be honest. You shouldn't equate modern personality cults with those of the past. Personality cults in antiquity were mostly a Macedonian/Greek and later a Roman Imperial thing (though mostly in the East of the Empire) that came about because the Levantine populations equated kingship with divintiy. Copying the dress and habits of rulers was very often frowned upon and often simply illegal.I would contend that it does, since monarchies of that era, and Egyptians in particular tended to be personality cults. And everybody wants to copy whoever's in charge.
I tried getting into CK2 once but ended up giving up due to all the mechanics and having to read/watch tutorials to understand any of it.You ought to start playing CK3 then, you'll be amazed!
Yeah, all paradox games have a steep learning curve. I've barely played CK3 compared to CK2, but I believe it's easier to learn for a beginner. It's also relatively new so it hasn't suffered so much from feature creep yet.I tried getting into CK2 once but ended up giving up due to all the mechanics and having to read/watch tutorials to understand any of it.
As an amateur historian I can say this game is rather tame compared to historical Ancient Egypt. The history channel you watched as a child gave out very censored image of Ancient Egypt, so no wonder they focused on Pyramids and pottery shards instead, you know, how people lived back then according to preserved material discoveries.I actually get all my historical information from porn forums
I'm a little wary of treating sacred scriptures as historically accurate.. And of the top of my head, i can't remember a great many direct incest stories other than Jacob marrying two sisters (not his sisters).. other than references to Sodom and Gomorrah, which did not end well for the people involvedYou might want to read the old testament also ... they married their sisters/daughters too.
For boys and girls living most of their life in the harem of their pater familias,
what does anyone expect of them?
Only Gods are allowed to have sex with each others, and in Ancient Egypt rulers were literal embodiments of Gods. To be fair the evidence of incest is limited mainly to ruling dynasty, as majority of written documents focused solely to them. This is mind we don't really know how widespread incest was in Ancient Egypt, but what is certain is that incest was legal and was used to monopolize power into hands of small elite. In short rich had to bang their sisters and daughters while poors could marry more freely.To be fair, the incest thing was mostly a Pharaoh concern, to preserve the purity of the divine bloodline or something like that. Small wonder Tuthankamun was riddled with genetic flaws
It is a bit more complicated in Old Testament. In Old Testament it is revealed Abraham married his half-sister Sarah, they had same father but different mother if I remember correctly, and this might be the reason why they were unable to have children until Abraham met God. Later three almost identical stories occur first with Pharaoh and Abraham, second time with Abimelech and Abraham and third time again with Abimelech and Isaac. They all go in following way that a foreign ruler desired Abraham's/Isaac's sister but is later horrified finding out it was their sister-wife. While the incest was not forbidden the tone pretty much was "dude just no". Much later in Leviticus incest is pretty solidly forbidden.You might want to read the old testament also ... they married their sisters/daughters too.
For boys and girls living most of their life in the harem of their pater familias,
what does anyone expect of them?
The first cuck literally murders the first chad. I find this amusing.There is also hidden incest right in the beginning of the Bibble. When Abel and Cain sacrifices for God, God is pleased with Abel's sacrifice and not with Cain's. This as we know it lead Cain slaying Abel known as first murder.
The missing part is why Cain became so angry by losing to his brother Abel? In Islamic, Beta Israeli and Ethiopian Orthodox Church the tradition says both Abel and Cain were born with twin sisters Awan and Azura, and when Cain lost Adam decided Abel should marry Cain's twin which lead to first murder. While this sounds weird, it made perfectly sense to people at that time. In Babylonian mythology first Gods were Absu and Tiamat, who bore twins Lahamu and Lahmu, who bore twins Anshar and Kishar and they in turn bore the Elder Gods. Adam's decision broke this cycle, and this was the background story which was left out from our version of Bibble.