Fact is when it comes to games like this where the work put in is obviously disproportionate to the money it's taking in... people who are paying are straight up being scammed - it's okay to be upset that other people are getting scammed. I wish people would actually remember or care to revoke their subs, actually give the dev a reason to care, scare them that their cash cow might dry up, but they won't. They either forget they have the subscription or are so down bad for the game they're willing to pay out the nose just for the chance the project gets finished. Maybe some people can afford it and they don't care idk. Either way, people don't deserve to have their money taken for the expectation the project gets worked on at a reasonable pace while the author releases 10 hours of work every couple months, even if we are getting it for free.
Like it's nuts that people pay 60 bucks for a triple-A game but they pay 5 bucks a month for 3 years (180 bucks) or more on a product that never gets finished.
It's crazy to me that it's so damn ubiquitous. I know no one it actually effects is going to read this, but please for the love of fuck only donate to projects that give weekly updates and you can tell are producing reasonable amounts of work, it's only going to change if people stop giving them money.
You highlighted an interesting difference between:
Buying a AAA game
and
Supporting a small creator making something unique that the supporter enjoys.
When someone buys a AAA game, they are buying something that should be a finished product (and buggy AAA releases are far OT).
When one supports a creator via SS or Patreon - one is supporting a creator's intent/concept backed up by some level of demo. The very nature of supporting AVNs on these platforms is that they are Not complete and that the $ provided by supporters will help with AVN development.
I started Desert Stalker as a non $ supporter and gave the dev a chance to show me his vision for this AVN.
I was Not disappointed; in fact - I enjoyed it enough to become a $ supporter.
I'm happy to support this dev with $, in spite of the number of people who come here to take it for free while complaining about the dev scamming his $ supporters, the 'lack' of content, the slowness of updates, etc.
I have supported some devs for more than 3 years at $5/month.
The keys to my decision to support a dev over the long haul include:
Do I like what the dev is creating?
Does the dev consistently communicate with me?
Does the dev maintain a reasonable production schedule (quantity/quality produced over a given interval of time)?
Desert Stalker checks all three 'boxes' for me.
I'm not judging you for your choice in not supporting this AVN with $, but I find it interesting that you judge supporters like me for our choice.
I neither want nor need you to get upset for how I spend my money.
I've been 'adulting' for a long time - I'm good - thanks...
So - you can continue to complain about an AVN you are taking for free while justifying not supporting the dev and I will continue to look forward to playing this next rev of Desert Stalker once it is out of Beta.
Cheers!!