Why, though?This was intentionally removed.
Why, though?This was intentionally removed.
This is my unofficial version for android.Android version 0.17 update?
Umm..yes, they were and have been for a long time. As Lab pointed out though, it seems they have been intentionally removed.those images were never part of the game
Ah.. that's concerning. The game has been on steam for 5 minutes and they already started to remove content for Ain.Umm..yes, they were and have been for a long time. As Lab pointed out though, it seems they have been intentionally removed.
Yes...Steam don't care about incest, consent blah blah. So removing this scene is certainly an odd decision.Isn't steam supposed to be more relaxed than Patreon in that regard?
Come on... we removed, what, probably 5 renders? Sure, people might have liked that part a lot, but it's still 5 renders.Ah.. that's concerning. The game has been on steam for 5 minutes and they already started to remove content for Ain.
Hey Paz...may we ask why that scene was removed, assume it was discussed beforehand and then the decision made? Just curious as it seems a rather innoculous scene to decide to remove but imo (at least) an important one to show and highlight dynamics.Come on... we removed, what, probably 5 renders? Sure, people might have liked that part a lot, but it's still 5 renders.
We also added 40 new ones or something of her, so it's not like Ain is pinning for the fjords.
I think it is more because of Patreon, iirc someone from the team said that both versions are similar, hence the las Patreoningans they probably decided to take the safe aproach.Yes...Steam don't care about incest, consent blah blah. So removing this scene is certainly an odd decision.
But how much will you avoid making for her in the future if you are steering into this "playing it safe" mindset?Come on... we removed, what, probably 5 renders? Sure, people might have liked that part a lot, but it's still 5 renders.
We also added 40 new ones or something of her, so it's not like Ain is pinning for the fjords.
But you can fuck her a few updates later...so no, that cannot be the reason. Also, given Patreons anal obsession about shit like this one could argue it's a wonder it's even still on Patreon they way they have been going after devs lately. Adopted...step...whatever, Patreon don't care about the 'terminology' a dev decides to use.I think it is more because of Patreon, iirc someone from the team said that both versions are similar, hence the las Patreoningans they probably decided to take the safe aproach.
At least that is the explanation what I could think of.
Why would we avoid making content for her in the future? As I mentioned, we just added more renders (a new early scene) with her. That's the opposite of avoiding her.But how much will you avoid making for her in the future if you are steering into this "playing it safe" mindset?
Is it appropriate to ban and imprison the person who failed to provide those five renderings?Come on... we removed, what, probably 5 renders? Sure, people might have liked that part a lot, but it's still 5 renders.
We also added 40 new ones or something of her, so it's not like Ain is pinning for the fjords.
and we are, true strong male people, We fully support this. Down with the leftist and globalist agenda. We do want full immersion in the work.I'm shocked a game where you get to shag your own daughters is even allowed on Steam.
And we're asking what's the reason for this because there seems to be none (valid). Why remove such nice renders at all (especially since we can fuck Shani and Ain)?Come on... we removed, what, probably 5 renders? Sure, people might have liked that part a lot, but it's still 5 renders.
We also added 40 new ones or something of her, so it's not like Ain is pinning for the fjords.
what are talk about? What happened?Is it appropriate to ban and imprison the person who failed to provide those five renderings?