SelfDrillingSMS made some of the best stuff I've ever seen. Too bad they stopped making the unsupported content and then wiped it from existence. What a waste of talent to see them making more of the same old 18+ shit that everyone else makes.
Collection Video Drills3D Collection [2025-04-05] [SelfDrillingSMS]
orrayt3x
Active Member
- May 23, 2017
- 559
- 2,369
Southrim
Newbie
- Jun 6, 2017
- 83
- 271
As far as I know, he's been getting harassed with dedication by people who have trouble distinguishing between fiction and reality for years now (you can see previous pages in the thread for posts by that type). Even the fact that you call it 'unsupported' was not an initial attribute of his work, just one of many adaptations he's made to the hounding, along with the revolving door of names, sites, and disappearing artwork.
Frankly, if that allows him to continue his output unhindered by internet dramatists, I'm fine with it. His previous work is archived in many places. The major appeal of Drill3D's work is that it's top 5 quality for porn animation. His most recent release is fantastic, and it's too bad if you truly can't enjoy it. There are other artists who do that stuff, and some are quite good.
If all you want is that stuff, this isn't really the site for you. I don't agree with the wishy/washy application of Global Rule 7 (or some other things), but I do understand its necessity for a site that doesn't want the same harassment. I'm here for the wide array of content that is available.
Southrim
Newbie
- Jun 6, 2017
- 83
- 271
It seems unlikely, I think Judy is the oldest woman they've ever animated. Drills3D still has a type, even if they've restricted the range.
Eh, drills does tend towards smaller women but in general everything he does is as realistic as possible, which is why the animations get so much love. The reactions, the expressions - and the models. No balloon tits or weird AF proportions, ever, which is a nice change even when he uses bustier models.
Deleted member 4451259
Newbie
- Dec 11, 2021
- 70
- 154
In theory, yeah, but I have understood the artist didn't made a sequel, right? Unless I'm wrong.
locomarinazon
Member
- Dec 23, 2019
- 189
- 467
This does not include the rimming experience with
You must be registered to see the links
ReichLoli
Engaged Member
- Mar 1, 2020
- 2,717
- 4,018
locomarinazon
Member
- Dec 23, 2019
- 189
- 467
Jimmeh
Member
- Jun 20, 2017
- 218
- 523
Look, jerking it to little girls is frowned upon these days.
It also says
"please refrain from discussing, linking, or requesting such content"
It also says
"please refrain from discussing, linking, or requesting such content"
ReichLoli
Engaged Member
- Mar 1, 2020
- 2,717
- 4,018
If its not 2D and unrealistic depictions. It's against Rule 7 on F95Zone.
Last edited:
locomarinazon
Member
- Dec 23, 2019
- 189
- 467
- Aug 11, 2017
- 10,669
- 92,056
These are legal lolis.
- Aug 11, 2017
- 10,669
- 92,056
ReichLoli
Engaged Member
- Mar 1, 2020
- 2,717
- 4,018
I already been on this road already with rf96 within the kawaiidetectiveenthusiast thread and with other mods. Then have my comments deleted multiple time for showcasing how Rule 7 is being enforce arbitrarily for certain threads. Here my stand on this content: if is not made out of the suspense from a individual. Then don't care about the argument of "depiction." If no one been harm from the making of said content in the first place. Now that you know that; I'm not crying, I'm just telling you the rules that everyone else have to deal with.
2D and unrealistic loli depictions. You can't depict something that was never a real depiction in the first place.
orrayt3x
Active Member
- May 23, 2017
- 559
- 2,369
sluttica95
Newbie
- Aug 16, 2020
- 65
- 213