- Jul 11, 2020
- 123
- 140
So far, the MC gets dominated either way... but, if you chose the dom path, he can also dominate himself a little. Perhaps there might be an ending where he might actually be able to turn the tables, who knows.Saw this also has the Male Dom tag, does that mean you get to choose if he's dominated or dominates?
Given the ending of the dom path of the current version, I think he's already started to turn the tables.So far, the MC gets dominated either way... but, if you chose the dom path, he can also dominate himself a little. Perhaps there might be an ending where he might actually be able to turn the tables, who knows.
You said "deranged." And I didn't say "for everybody," just for fucks like you and me.I'm not judging anybodys character, just saying that believing "the world has a place for everybody" is fucking silly at best. Won't drag the topic though, it's not the place for that
I don't know. Isabella was obviously studying ballet way before the beginning of the game -- it isn't just about her using "background time," it's more about the kind of education she was given.You can not have a character to do whatever the plot needs him to do. I mean you can, but its cheap as hell.
Its about setting up rules and trying to following them, for instance: you can not have one side sticking to a background, and the other side, no background at all, and make them perform ballet, psychoanalysis, shaolin restrains in heels, or speak mandarin or whatever the plot needs them to do. Isabella is an example of that.
Not surprising at all that an apparent educated and smart kid doesn't even know his fathers debts are non of his responsibility...but goes along with it all anyway lol.Is it really surprising if they don't come up with big schemes? Their adapting to the overall situation of humiliation just because of MC's father's debts strikes me as harder to swallow than their apparent lack of planning.
I wrote about this a few pages earlier, the legal aspects here are actually a little more complicated than that. Sure, you are not legally bound to recognize your parents' debts, but inheritance is a package deal - you either accept it with all estate debts or refuse it alltogether. If the MC wants to keep his parents' house, for instance, he must recognize their debts as well. And well, without a job, it won't be easy for him to rent anything, not to mention that he may also have strong emotional attachment to the place.Not surprising at all that an apparent educated and smart kid doesn't even know his fathers debts are non of his responsibility...but goes along with it all anyway lol.
Rightly the business would probably go to him (providing there was actually a will in place), or even between him and his sister and if there was not a will...providing he pushed for it. But why do that (knowing he seen a lawyer)? Also...knowing the scale of the debt...why not just file for bankruptcy? The house is irelevent to the business.....even with debts against it. Especially if this is set in the States. hell, even in the Uk you'd probably keep the house under court laws of reasonable living conditions knowing it's worthless compared to the debt.I wrote about this a few pages earlier, the legal aspects here are actually a little more complicated than that. Sure, you are not legally bound to recognize your parents' debts, but inheritance is a package deal - you either accept it with all estate debts or refuse it alltogether. If the MC wants to keep his parents' house, for instance, he must recognize their debts as well. And well, without a job, it won't be easy for him to rent anything, not to mention that he may also have strong emotional attachment to the place.
Hm... I do see where you're coming from, and I do agree that the initial debt premise is more than a bit iffy; and I'll go as far as saying that the shaving scene does seem to presuppose psychological features the MC had given no evidence of possessing up to that point. Still... the emotions expressed in those scenes are quite well described, and the bond between MC and his friend/sister is quite apparent. This pleases me. You may be right that more work would have been necessary to justify the decisions the MC makes in the first shaving scene, but the fact that this is the level of criticism one can make at this point (and the fact that the game becomes less criticizable on these grounds as the story progresses) still makes it quite good for me, when compared to other games with similar plots. (Starless, for instance, is way, way worse in terms of character believability.)Rightly the business would probably go to him (providing there was actually a will in place), or even between him and his sister and if there was not a will...providing he pushed for it. But why do that (knowing he seen a lawyer)? Also...knowing the scale of the debt...why not just file for bankruptcy? The house is irelevent to the business.....even with debts against it. Especially if this is set in the States. hell, even in the Uk you'd probably keep the house under court laws of reasonable living conditions knowing it's worthless compared to the debt.
I'll say it again...beautiful game as far as renders go and interesting where the story is going now...but the initial set up up to and including the shaving scene (for someone he apparently loves and promises to protect her) is as dumb and thick as bricks as the MC himself. Change that entire plot...I'd more than likey rave about this...even if it's not mainly my kink.
Completely agree this is a very high quality VN all round which I'm glad I decided to give a second go.Hm... I do see where you're coming from, and I do agree that the initial debt premise is more than a bit iffy; and I'll go as far as saying that the shaving scene does seem to presuppose psychological features the MC had given no evidence of possessing up to that point. Still... the emotions expressed in those scenes are quite well described, and the bond between MC and his friend/sister is quite apparent. This pleases me. You may be right that more work would have been necessary to justify the decisions the MC makes in the first shaving scene, but the fact that this is the level of criticism one can make at this point (and the fact that the game becomes less criticizable on these grounds as the story progresses) still makes it quite good for me, when compared to other games with similar plots. (Starless, for instance, is way, way worse in terms of character believability.)
Maybe I should put it like this: the prose in this game pleases me quite a lot. The style, and the insight it gives into the characters, is a great plus for me; it's not just pretty renders. It therefore makes me willing to minimize or even forget some flaws, like the ones you point out. All in all, this is quite above average.
It actually depends pretty much on how the business is organized... if it was a Corp. or an LLC, then yes, you are correct. But if the business was conducted as sole proprietorship or general partnership, the proprietor(s) would be subject to unlimited personal liability, meaning that all their business creditors would have a claim on their personal property in case of bankruptcy and on their estate in case of death.The house is irelevent to the business.....even with debts against it. Especially if this is set in the States. hell, even in the Uk you'd probably keep the house under court laws of reasonable living conditions knowing it's worthless compared to the debt.
Correct creditors could....therefore just file for bankruptcy...any court would allow you to keep the house (they would not make you homeless and even under strict UK bankruptcy laws, you are still afforded a degree of luxury and would not force you out of a property unless it was worth a LOT of money, USA bankruptcy laws are ridiculosuly simple and easy in comparison).It actually depends pretty much on how the business is organized... if it was a Corp. or an LLC, then yes, you are correct. But if the business was conducted as sole proprietorship or general partnership, the proprietor(s) would be subject to unlimited personal liability, meaning that all their business creditors would have a claim on their personal property in case of bankruptcy and on their estate in case of death.
Ok, let's suppose you accept an inheritance which includes a piece of real estate and lots of debts and you file for bankruptcy. What happens next? Well, you normally lose the title to the said piece of real estate. If you fail to vacate the premises after that, it is called "wrongful occupation" and the holder of legal title to the property can sue for eviction. Granted, in some jurisdictions it may be rather hard to evict a person from their only residence, but it is still possible in all jurisdictions I am familiar with. Being a lawyer IRL, I've seen it happen more than once.Correct creditors could....therefore just file for bankruptcy...any court would allow you to keep the house (they would not make you homeless and even under strict UK bankruptcy laws, you are still afforded a degree of luxury and would not force you out of a property unless it was worth a LOT of money, USA bankruptcy laws are ridiculosuly simple and easy in comparison).
We can debate this all day long...it doesn't change what would happen nor the ridiculous set up.
THIS.The game turned out to be a bit slower than I hoped...