1. I and anyone else can criticise the game without having to get the names of the characters right. Making an adhom just to avoid acknowledging a valid criticism is a tad pathetic.
Yes, but not taking the time to get the names right WILL resulting people paying less attention to your comments, since it suggests (doesn't MEAN, just SUGGESTS) that you haven't analyzed the game seriously. If you'd been assigned to write a book review or critique of Moby Dick and referred to the protagonist as "Isaiah" instead of "Ishmael," I suspect that your professor would react in a similar way, no?
2. While there hasn't been any actual incest, there have been plenty of nods in that direction - Chapter 6 in particular. As for scenes that didn't happen - what a trite phrase that is, there's a picture of Parker balls deep in his sister, and later in Chapter 11a with him and his mum. Throughout the whole story there is a lowkey incestuous vibe going on.
The original focus of the game was to be the cops and their interactions with the various women in the game. I admit that I have drifted away from that to a certain extent, but that's in no small part due to the fact that the original writer bailed out of the game after Chapter 4, leaving me writing it solo. And I'm far from the world's greatest writer.
As for STDH, I made a conscious choice NOT to go down the incest route with the main game. There are just SO many games that follow that trope. I wanted to be "somewhat different." However, I got requests over and over and over again in this thread (and from the people that actually support the game financially, who carry greater weight) to see "X do Y with Z." So, I created STDH so that I had a place to do those scenes to please them. So, anything you see in STDH is NOT canon - it's "what might I have tossed in if I wanted to be like every other male protagonist game out there."
And I'm not sure why you describe the phrase "Scenes That Didn't Happen" as "trite." Maybe it
isn't horribly original, but it's descriptive. By your standards, the titles of most porn projects must be "trite." How many of them are variations of phrases involving "Mother," "MILF," "Sister" or "Family?"
3. Well isn't that just an inability to see things as they are. He's a douche for the way he acts irrespective of whether he banged her mum. That's just a standalone given. It's not like it would have been the first time, as that was in Chapter 11a.
Yes, Parker
is a bit of a douche. And he's also periodically clueless. Of course, an awful lot of us were guilty of both (in differing parts) when we were Parker's age. But if you want seriously believable characters and actions, porn projects are NOT the place you should be looking.
4. Except he kind of does want to bang everything in sight, his failure to do so is on him. His complete moral degeneracy is on display throughout the whole game but especially so in Chapter 15 ... so honestly I'm at a loss as to what you're trying to imply with this petty "MC bangs every one of the women" jibe. He does want to and his failure to do so is not because it's not that kind of game it's because he's played out of character. I suspect the Dev actually thinks the guy isn't a morally degenerate scumbag, but an actual fkn hero.
Quite the contrary. Parker frequently thinks with his dick. At his age, given some of the opportunities presented in the game, would you not have taken advantage of them? Yes, in one of the story routes he ends up being the hero, but I guarantee he's not in the other. The whole reason there ARE two routes is that I was torn between having him follow the arc that the original writer laid out vs the "happily ever after" route.
5. The two concepts aren't mutually exclusive. On the one hand in the context of a porn game, and his character, he should have been banging every girl in sight. In the context of the guy as a human being he would definitely need removing from the gene pool.
I was tempted to say "So, the only valid porn game with a teen-age male protagonist is one in which he bangs every girl in sight? IMHO, you have a very limited view of how porn games "should" be designed." But, of course, you did include the qualifier "with his character." You may, if you wish, put this contradiction down to my overall lack of talent as a writer.
It's worth pointing out (again, since I've said this multiple times) that there are some autobiographical elements to certain of the characters, and some of those elements didn't weave into the entire story arc as well as they might have. Again, all on me as the writer of most of this.
It's more than ironic to criticise someone for making a trivial naming mistake when it's quite clear you paid so little attention to the actual game yourself.
With respect, accusing L.Lumpy of paying "little attention to the actual game itself" is COMPLETELY off-base, as he and I are acquaintances outside of F95, and have had regular, sometimes-lengthy discussions about the project's past, present and future. Which, frankly, makes his understanding of the individual characters, their motivations and their foibles
substantially deeper than yours.
So, I'll close with my standard comment. Thanks for stopping by. If you find the project just too awful to bear, you're welcome to find something you like better. Or
produce something that doesn't exhibit the same issues that you're raising.
Rich