What I wanted to point out, that usually in real life femdom, sub has more power in relationship, cause with safe-word he essentially can choose how he wants to be dommed, sub is also usually more interested party, don't quote me on that, but i read somewhere that in BDSM subs are much more common, basically everyone wants to be dominated and its much harder to find willing dominant. So basically all of it is done for sub's sake, in a way he choses, but does all of this make such relationship maledom? No, not really, it is still classified as femdom.
Also part i want to contest is this: "... focus needs to be on her pleasure ... The male sub's pleasure should come from submitting to her dominance, not just her wishes [whatever they may be], but her dominance". This is often not the case in femdom games at all, often male takes no pleasure or even hates what happens to him, while mine pleasure, as a reader's, comes from the humiliation mainly, i don't know if domme even feels any pleasure, maybe she hates it with passion, i can't get in her head, but if her acting is believable i wouldn't know. But that's more like nitpicking, i understand general idea that you propose, and stick with it.
Also part i want to contest is this: "... focus needs to be on her pleasure ... The male sub's pleasure should come from submitting to her dominance, not just her wishes [whatever they may be], but her dominance". This is often not the case in femdom games at all, often male takes no pleasure or even hates what happens to him, while mine pleasure, as a reader's, comes from the humiliation mainly, i don't know if domme even feels any pleasure, maybe she hates it with passion, i can't get in her head, but if her acting is believable i wouldn't know. But that's more like nitpicking, i understand general idea that you propose, and stick with it.
Last edited: