Recommending Femdom Finder

5.00 star(s) 10 Votes

Aseratrix

Engaged Member
Dec 16, 2019
2,232
4,887
I'm not trying to kink shame just expressing my opinion, I serious not a fan of anything related to exchange of body fluid or anything, piss, cum or other type with any context.
Yeah, "horrible dear god"! Innit? Just horrible! Sure, you just had to express it in that specific "shocked" and patronizing way. If you can't see how "expressing" it the way you did is bordering on kinkshaming, I can't help you. Its just sad.
 
Last edited:

Aseratrix

Engaged Member
Dec 16, 2019
2,232
4,887
Wow, bro, take chill pill, you start nice, i can 100% agree that kinkshaming on fetish thread on porn forum is wrong, then you proceed to kink shame futa and dicks cause you personally don't like them, really? I mean i get that you don't consider futa as female but that point is quite debatable really. Same as 2d wifus that you encounter in games don't exist in real world, same applies to futas they are just fantasy of a hypothetical girl that is completely woman with addition of having a dick as well. Imagine woman wearing strapon, would you cease to consider her woman anymore cause "strapon isn't part of FEMALE ANATOMY, REEEEE!!!", i fail to see how imaginary dick on imaginary girl makes her no longer woman, it is matter of perspective, really. Also you hate dicks and cum, ok, no one forbids you, but it's also part of femdom, either you like it or not, cause femdom is usually applied toward male, and they usually have dicks which can cum, you know what i mean? One of the most popular scenes in femdom is when domme forces her sub to lick his cum from her boots, i imagine what suffering you may feel cause "cum isn't part of female, neither are boots" but its 100% femdom still. Even though you have no problems with fantasy of eating female shit, others might find this exact fantasy repulsing. I still don't know why everyone started commenting on this all of sudden, it really looks like they're defending themselves: "look i'm not one of those perverts i wouldn't fap to this ever". This is quite lame indeed, but then you point that out and do exactly same thing, why?
I never ever kinkshamed the futa fetish, I was crystal clear each time that the reason futa games are not welcome on this thread, its because it is restricted to femdom games. Femdom = female domination. Futas are not females. That's it. This is not kink-shaming, just the basic definition based on which I started this thread.

Additionally I did say that I personally don't like futa and male reproductive organs in general, but in comparison to some I never used any derogatory, shocked or denigrating verbiage in doing so. Saying that penises are part of male anatomy is just a biological fact, not hate, not kink-shaming. I simply emphasized that this thread is about celebrating femdom and females. Females do not have dicks, for heterosexuals that is a no brainer. When we want to submit to a female we want to submit to a female equipped with all the nature given anatomical features they have, including female reproductive organs, even in fantasy. Again, this is not kink-shaming. You are perfectly ok if you like futas and if you like cocks, they are simply not the chosen theme of this thread.

Strapons are sex-toys. Some submissives like it, others don't. Personally they don't interest me, but I have nothing against using sex toys, because they are not actual organs which defines a particular sex. Most of the time pegging is used as a form of humiliation, while the female is still entirely female both from the perspective of the domme and the perspective of the sub. But since I am not into that particular femdom fetish, I can't comment further. Sex-toys do not make a girl into a boy, because its obviously just an attachment. However, if a being is presented with a fully functional male reproductive organ, producing sperm, then the same suspension of disbelief is not possible, and since the imaginary girl lacks girl-parts, all I can see is a feminine looking male fucking someone in some orifice.

"Also you hate dicks and cum, ok, no one forbids you, but it's also part of femdom, either you like it or not, cause femdom is usually applied toward male, and they usually have dicks which can cum, you know what i mean?"

Games which actually focus on femdom do not focus on the fact that the sub probably cums, and certainly do not linger on that fact. Do you know what I mean?

"One of the most popular scenes in femdom is when domme forces her sub to lick his cum from her boots..."

Yes, I personally skip those scenes as well. But since that does not involve another male other than the one you are supposed to identify with, I can see how that is something taken as humiliating done to them by the will of the woman. Its quite funny tho, because you indeed managed to name exactly the two fetishes which feature in some femdom games I am completely left placid by [pegging, and cum-eating for sure]. It is however not that popular as you think. And the female herself in those scenarios is still entirely female.

<<it really looks like they're defending themselves: "look i'm not one of those perverts i wouldn't fap to this ever".>>

Yes, this is the most common form kink-shaming takes. I do not, and repeat do not think that its gross for you or anyone else to like cocks, futas, or cum, or whatever it may be. You just simply refuse to see and acknowledge, my very simple, very clear, and totally justified actual argument here: this thread is dedicated to femdom and femdom only, therefore its appropriate to exalt and glorify females, but it is not the place to share non-femdom fetishes. That's the essence.

I hope this is settled now.
 
Last edited:

archdude

Active Member
Dec 19, 2017
601
932
I never ever kinkshamed the futa fetish, I was crystal clear each time that the reason futa games are not welcome on this thread, because it is restricted to femdom games. Femdom = female domination. Futas are not females. That's it. This is not kink-shaming, just the basic definition based on which I started this thread.

Additionally I did say that I personally don't like futa and male reproductive organs in general, but in comparison to some I never used any derogatory, shocked or denigrating verbiage in doing so. I simply emphasized that this thread is about celebrating femdom and females. Females do not have dicks, for heterosexuals that is a no brainer. When we want to submit to a female we want to submit to a female equipped with all the nature given anatomical features they have, including female reproductive organs, even in fantasy. Again, this is not kink-shaming. You are perfectly ok if you like futas and if you like cocks, they are simply not the chosen theme of this thread.

Strapons are sex-toys. Some submissives like it, others don't. Personally they don't interest me, but I have nothing against using sex toys, because they are not actual organs which defining a particular sex. Most of the time pegging is used as a form of humiliation, while the female is still entirely female both from the perspective of the domme and the perspective of the sub. But since I am not into that particular femdom fetish, I can't comment further. Sex-toys do not make a girl into a boy, because its obviously just an attachment. However, if a being is presented with a fully functional male reproductive organ, producing sperm, then the same suspension of disbelief is not possible, and since the imaginary girl lacks girl-parts, all I can see is a feminine looking male fucking someone in some orifice.

"Also you hate dicks and cum, ok, no one forbids you, but it's also part of femdom, either you like it or not, cause femdom is usually applied toward male, and they usually have dicks which can cum, you know what i mean?"

Games which actually focus on femdom do not focus on the fact that the sub probably cums, and certainly do not linger on that fact. Do you know what I mean?

"One of the most popular scenes in femdom is when domme forces her sub to lick his cum from her boots..."

Yes, I personally skip those scenes as well. But since that does not involve another male other than the one you are supposed to identify with, I can see how that is something taken as being seen as something humiliating done to them by the will of the woman. Its quite funny tho, because you indeed managed to name exactly the two fetishes which feature in some femdom games which I am completely uninterested by [pegging, and cum-eating for sure]. It is however not that popular as you think. And the female herself in those scenarios is still entirely female.

I hope this is settled now.
Yeah, i wasn't questioning your believes, i think i can now pretty accurately guess what you think about different aspects of femdom based and what you say, and it helps you you're very vocal on these matters. I just wanted to share some perspective from other femdom fans that might find enjoyable different sides of femdom comparing to you, so that there be less hate on this thread.
Also want to note that classic futanari has all girl-parts (from wiki: ふたなり, seldom: 二形, 双形, literally: dual form; 二成, 双成, literally: "[to be of] two kinds" ). They are magical creatures that have 100% girl body and mind with addition of penis (sometimes with testicles, sometimes without) attached somewhere above vulva. They're neither intersex, neither shemales, cause both those cases have much more masculine in them. Also i was always curious how do japanese even imagine both sets of fully functional organs internally, where does the prostate go, do they have 2 urethras, do they have both sets of testicles and ovaries even though those are formed from same teasue inside of fetus, etc. etc. But same as with some questionable aspects of monstergirl anatomy, most people just don't care that much, they are take is as granted.
 
Last edited:

Mister_M

Engaged Member
Apr 2, 2018
2,388
4,597
Really? I always thought it's 二成!

Edit: After quick look in the dictionary it seems that it's either 二成 or 二形 (which makes sense); 双成り seems to be alternate form, but used for hermaphrodite; androgyny (though it's usually written in kana anyway) and not for futanari. Seems like dictionary disagrees with wiki.

Edit 2: After the edit it seems that everyone agrees with each other again :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sunshaded

Jaike

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
1,441
5,046
Scat is not my thing either, but I don't get the widespread aversion to fictional scat. Even Daz renders of excrement are so unrealistic that they hardly evoke the guttural reaction of the real thing. But maybe I have been desensitised by my country's pastry.

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Insisting that all female-attracted people should be open to sexual relations with trans women and all male-attracted people should be open to sexual relations with trans men is a fringe view among trans activists, but it's a harmful one that is amplified on social media. I am sure it will eventually go down in history as the social evil that it is.

Whether futanari are presented as female, male, intersex or a separate gender varies a lot in different works of fiction. I think that is a good reason to treat it as a separate category.

One thing about TiTs that has not been mentioned is that you can also play as a female character and dominate males, females, futa, hermaphrodites and gelatinous blobs and such. But I think it's going to be a challenge to have an exclusively dominant playthrough.
 

archdude

Active Member
Dec 19, 2017
601
932
One thing about TiTs that has not been mentioned is that you can also play as a female character and dominate males, females, futa, hermaphrodites and gelatinous blobs and such. But I think it's going to be a challenge to have an exclusively dominant playthrough.
Oh, yeah, that's correct, but i usually don't consider such content cause its written from perspective of MC who is dominating at the moment, and i'm a dummy who can only relate with MC when i read scene, so that it appears that i'm dominant in the relationship and that kinda defeats all the purpose of femdom in my eyes. But hey, that's just me, others are welcome to feel differently.
 

LAKueiJin

Active Member
Apr 15, 2020
712
1,424
Also i was always curious how do japanese even imagine both sets of fully functional organs internally, where does the prostate go, do they have 2 urethras, do they have both sets of testicles and ovaries even though those are formed from same teasue inside of fetus, etc. etc. But same as with some questionable aspects of monstergirl anatomy, most people just don't care that much, they are take is as granted.
Just a silly guess, so don't take this too seriously, but I think there's honestly a chance whoever first came up with the concept of futanari just... didn't think of the biological problems? A lot of heterosexual men, even the kinky kind, tend to be completely illiterate when it comes to female anatomy - did you know that in a 2019 survey conducted at Cambridge by doctor Dina El-Hamamsy and her colleagues, 43% of men thought tampons interfere with urination and therefore had the misconception that the female urethra is not a separate hole from the vagina? Or that 31% couldn't correctly identify the clitoris on a diagram of the vulva, 49% got the labia wrong (any part of it, not just inner/outer or labia minora/majora, and "lips" was an accepeted correct answer too...) and 59% of men couldn't even label the vagina??? :oops: Yeah, I know, shocking to first hear this, but I think it reflects a lot on our society how much more prevalent knowledge of the male reproductive anatomy is than of the female one... Hell, the same survey even showed that most women would label at least some parts of the vulva wrong, with only 9% of respondents across both sexes getting everything right, so if knowledge about female anatomy is this taboo and sparse even in a western country like Britain, I'd imagine chances are there are big issues with this in Japan as well... :unsure: Then again, a lot of their games are very specific with which parts of the vulva are licked or massaged in any pussy worship scene I have seen, so perhaps the only thing this survey shows is that Britons still are as prudish as queen Victoria... :LOL:
 
  • Red Heart
Reactions: Aseratrix

Aseratrix

Engaged Member
Dec 16, 2019
2,232
4,887
Yeah, i wasn't questioning your believes, i think i can now pretty accurately guess what you think about different aspects of femdom based and what you say, and it helps you you're very vocal on these matters. I just wanted to share some perspective from other femdom fans that might find enjoyable different sides of femdom comparing to you, so that there be less hate on this thread.
Also want to note that classic futanari has all girl-parts (from wiki: ふたなり, seldom: 二形, 双形, literally: dual form; 二成, 双成, literally: "[to be of] two kinds" ). They are magical creatures that have 100% girl body and mind with addition of penis (sometimes with testicles, sometimes without) attached somewhere above vulva. They're neither intersex, neither shemales, cause both those cases have much more masculine in them. Also i was always curious how do japanese even imagine both sets of fully functional organs internally, where does the prostate go, do they have 2 urethras, do they have both sets of testicles and ovaries even though those are formed from same teasue inside of fetus, etc. etc. But same as with some questionable aspects of monstergirl anatomy, most people just don't care that much, they are take is as granted.
It is not about my "beliefs". Biological females exist, call them "cis" if you want, I don't care. This thread was made to cater to those of us who love biological females. I think I have all the rights in the world to use the definition I see as the correct one on a thread I started.

While I am familiar with the "futa" lore, that they supposedly have both sexual organs, feel free to show me a game featuring a futa where she uses her female organ. In reality, that aspect is completely forgotten in actual futa-based games, at least the ones I had the misfortune of trying. Even if there are some, cocks are still objectively part of male anatomy, I can't see how someone entirely heterosexual be like, "yeah, that's a hot female", looking at some big veiny cock with balls and pre-cum oozing. To each their own tho! If they do however, all the power to them, just not on this thread.

If reserving a small corner of this site for the veneration and adoration of biological females and pure femdom is such a sore, that's fucked up right there.
 
Last edited:

Mister_M

Engaged Member
Apr 2, 2018
2,388
4,597
That's exactly my reaction if I hear "femdom" + "asian girl" - I'm a simple man in that respect! :LOL: Have fun!
Yeah, unfortunately there isn't really any game with good femdom content with black women. Usually it's just some smaller scenes like in Femdom City. There's more content with Asians (Karlson's Gambit comes to mind), so you're in a better situation than me :p
 

LAKueiJin

Active Member
Apr 15, 2020
712
1,424
Yeah, unfortunately there isn't really any game with good femdom content with black women. Usually it's just some smaller scenes like in Femdom City. There's more content with Asians (Karlson's Gambit comes to mind), so you're in a better situation than me :p
Hmm, perhaps, even though I can think of games that have black dommes and no Asian ones as well. (like Mistresses of the Forest with the leader of the tribal women that capture you in the mines, or Town of Femdom with Asha, or even Dominant Witches, although the black "woman" there is a futa to be fair...) Slave high is also awesome, with the very aptly-named Asian domme "Mei" (pretty in Chinese), who I hope will become increasingly assertive and dominant in future updates! :love:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mister_M

Mister_M

Engaged Member
Apr 2, 2018
2,388
4,597
Hmm, perhaps, even though I can think of games that have black dommes and no Asian ones as well. (like Mistresses of the Forest with the leader of the tribal women that capture you in the mines, or Town of Femdom with Asha, or even Dominant Witches, although the black woman there is a futa to be fair...) Slave high is also awesome, with the very aptly-named Asian domme "Mei" (pretty in Chinese), who I hope will become increasingly assertive and dominant in future updates! :love:
You're right, but even they are not that very well developed. Mistresses of the Forest focuses mostly on the girl who MC is connected to and the rest is more of an episodic nature without any real relationship (like ongoing, evolving ones from KG, ED or NiF); Asha is cool, and there's policewoman in The Prison 2, but with these there's more of a collection of scenes than a proper relationship, though I think at least the policewoman is better developed than other black women in similar games. I'd love to see some black women among the main LIs in games like KG (there's Sonya, but she's def not one of the main cast) or Nothing is Forever (where femdom woman is least LI attractive to me).
 
  • Like
Reactions: LAKueiJin

archdude

Active Member
Dec 19, 2017
601
932
It is not about my "beliefs". Biological females exist, call them "cis" if you want, I don't care. This thread was made to cater to those of us who love biological females. I think I have all the rights in the world to use the definition I see as the correct one on a thread I started.

While I am familiar with the "futa" lore, that they supposedly have both sexual organs, feel free to show me a game featuring a futa where she uses her female organ. In reality, that aspect is completely forgotten in actual futa-based games, at least the ones I had the misfortune of trying. Even if there are some, cocks are still objectively part of male anatomy, I can't see how someone entirely heterosexual be like, "yeah, that's a hot female", looking at some big veiny cock with balls and pre-cum oozing. To each their own tho! If they do however, all the power to them, just not on this thread.

If reserving a small corner of this site for the veneration and adoration of biological females and pure femdom is such a sore, that's fucked up right there.
Meh, i just reread your OP, and it seems to me that this thread is all about femdom, but what you describe right is more like "woman worship". I fail to see how any dominance is necessary if you just want to celebrate beauty and perfection of natural woman body and mind.
I don't necessary share all your beliefs on femdom like these:
The female at minimum needs to be in a sexually dominant position, she needs to be in a position in which she is always respected, worshiped and the focus needs to be on her pleasure... The male sub's pleasure should come from submitting to her dominance, not just her wishes [whatever they may be], but her dominance...
Personally me, i'm sucker for humiliation mostly, i would still much prefer to be humiliated by beautiful female. My motivation may seem egocentric for you, but I have deep believe that most of femdom interactions are actually male focused, domme does what sub expects her to do, for his please, not her own. In a sense sub has more power in this relationship.
While we may have some differences, i still find this thread highly useful, cause it helps to filter "fake femdom", which is great, but i also think that you narrow it down too much, but that's just my imo, you can disregard it, cause we respect your effort as topic starter and apply to your vision, even if someone doesn't exactly agree on everything.
 

Aseratrix

Engaged Member
Dec 16, 2019
2,232
4,887
Meh, i just reread your OP, and it seems to me that this thread is all about femdom, but what you describe right is more like "woman worship". I fail to see how any dominance is necessary if you just want to celebrate beauty and perfection of natural woman body and mind.
I don't necessary share all your beliefs on femdom like these:
The female at minimum needs to be in a sexually dominant position, she needs to be in a position in which she is always respected, worshiped and the focus needs to be on her pleasure... The male sub's pleasure should come from submitting to her dominance, not just her wishes [whatever they may be], but her dominance...
Personally me, i'm sucker for humiliation mostly, i would still much prefer to be humiliated by beautiful female. My motivation may seem egocentric for you, but I have deep believe that most of femdom interactions are actually male focused, domme does what sub expects her to do, for his please, not her own. In a sense sub has more power in this relationship.
While we may have some differences, i still find this thread highly useful, cause it helps to filter "fake femdom", which is great, but i also think that you narrow it down too much, but that's just my imo, you can disregard it, cause we respect your effort as topic starter and apply to your vision, even if someone doesn't exactly agree on everything.
Domination is necessary because its about female domination = femdom. I really don't get it why you felt the need to participate in a thread of you didn't even bother to properly read the OP, and with which you do not agree. Woman worship is integral and essential part of femdom, as well as being humiliated and dominated by them. In genuine femdom the dominant woman leads [by definition], and thus the sub shouldn't have more power < the sub having more power really defeats the whole idea that the woman is on top, that she is the dominant party, and that would be maledom, not femdom. I would never dictate to a dominant woman to perform my fetishes on me, I merely hope she does them on her own accord and initiative, if not then I respect her wishes - she is the dominant, the sub sumbits, the dominant dominates. I do not narrow it down, I use femdom according to its proper definition: domination by females. Domination includes humiliation as part of psychological or mental domination, and it has many expressions, some of which are condensed in the form of some fetishes, which I obviously love.

To want to be humiliated is not egocentric at all, its part of femdom from a sub's perspective. What would be egocentric is to manipulate or gods forbid coerce or demand that woman humiliate you like some sort of pre-arranged scenario, that would not even be real humiliation. That would be service-domming, that is something like that you can get from women who are not actually dominant but who may do things to you in exchange for money, ie. "pro-dommes".
Personally I'm after lifestyle or naturally dominant women, both in real life and fantasy. The difference is obvious: the female who is actually getting off on being a sadist/dominant is not doing it for money, she is doing it because that's what she wants to do.
 
Last edited:
5.00 star(s) 10 Votes