- Sep 29, 2017
- 346
- 474
Changelog from discord. Only things at the bottom are implemented. Others are supposed to come in near future. And looks like there are some bugs with Genia and 2 rich girls that will be fixed in next bugfix.
- Aug 9, 2020
- 396
- 700
- Apr 14, 2023
- 666
- 699
Salia seems dead set on adding combat to the game. I wonder how much time and energy creating that kind of content will take up.
Although combat in this game is not really for me, is anyone here a fan of it?
Although combat in this game is not really for me, is anyone here a fan of it?
- Sep 29, 2017
- 346
- 474
Not a fan of battlefuck too. In all "fight the dominatrix" games (ToT, Domina, Catalyst etc) the best scenes are part of the quest, defeat consequences, enslavement. And battles are just a mechanics to prevent you from breezing through all the scenes too fast (with some lewd attacks/grapples to make things a little interesting). But there are people who like that kind of content, there is a reason these mixfight games exist.
- Oct 5, 2020
- 39
- 62
I was raised not to hit girls, but a woman who hits a man ceases to be a woman and automatically turns into a sparring partner
Combat sort of made sense when the game had goblins and monster girls in it... doesn't really make sense now that those were all removed and it's just schoolgirls.
- Aug 27, 2022
- 85
- 98
you know, girls who want to use your mouth as a toilet are kind of monsters, too.
If it's implemented like MGQ battles, I won't mind.
I doubt that will be the case though, so I'd land in the camp of... not a fan.
No, I only care about femdom, combat is a waste of time
I love the combat (big fan of female wrestling / catfights) 
- Feb 5, 2020
- 153
- 354
I didn't try the newer version, but I like combat too if it's well done. I like to be physically dominated and then humiliated for it! In a gym setting, or as self defense against bullies, it could fit in the game's concept.
- Mar 1, 2024
- 20
- 11
I could help maybe... what troubles you?
I totally get the combat is not everyone's cup of tea.
So I did this with a few things in mind:
1. You can lose 100% of all battles, and still win the game.
2. No battle will be forced twice.
3. All battles are replayable by choice.
4. Submissive playstyle : Use "wait" to let yourself get beaten.
(maybe in future I'll add submissive moves, like *beg* and *surrender*. )
So I did this with a few things in mind:
1. You can lose 100% of all battles, and still win the game.
2. No battle will be forced twice.
3. All battles are replayable by choice.
4. Submissive playstyle : Use "wait" to let yourself get beaten.
(maybe in future I'll add submissive moves, like *beg* and *surrender*. )
How about instead of "beg" add "all in" which is high risk high reward, a small chance to do decent damage but failing leaves you wide open for a counter attack.
- Feb 5, 2020
- 153
- 354
No that's a bad idea, it's completely different and random. Begging is submissive, all-in is an act of defiance and its randomness will prevent you from seeing specific moves, it's just annoying.