3.30 star(s) 12 Votes

kazeiheikaya

Member
Apr 1, 2024
348
769
147
View attachment 5167263
there is a reason why this is the number one on this Bingocard.
it may be a deciding factor if it gets the tag on f95
but it has no part in the definition of what counts as NTR

By your definition, neither mothers, sisters, nor childhood friends could be stolen if the protag is not fucking them, all of them are a staple of the genre.
I didn't only say NOT IN A RELATIONSHIP i said considered "if in an active relationship", then went onto further elaborate. But regardless NTR's core definition, does largely refer to the state of being in a relationship/starting a relationship, and I'm using it properly even if we wanna take that route.

I said didn't have claim. AKA literally DID NOTHING with the MC yet, not even HINTS to a relationship lmao. You cant posess ownership over someone that you have yet to even get that far with, thats the most roundabout logic I've ever heard. So you're NTR'd if a love interest has a boyfriend that breaks up with them AFTER the MC meets them but they banged before breaking up? That makes 0 sense.

Even the context of my comment suggested what I said "THIS UPDATE" is when the NTR flags would start considering the MC Just basically started a somewhat intimate setting with them. & yes if we arent actively doing anything with the mother, sisters, childhood friends, and the game hasn't decided that the flag has been initiated for them yet, and they have to have a tragic falling out to push them into the idea of incest or realizing they fucked up, who am I to say otherwise? lol. Aslong as I dont have to be physically involved with everything going on, I could careless, but laying claim to everything the second the game starts doesn't make any sense. Theres so many great stories where characters start out in a relationship prior to getting with the MC, they're a love interest, but they didnt wait around their entire existence to leap into MCs arms.

just to be completely transparent, if a LI is introduced as a "used toy" and I liked her, I'll drop the game. If an LI is shown in past scenes where they get banged or have an orgy, or college days, w/e I'll drop the game. I'm not a fan at all of watching LI's in sexual situations, even if its out of their control and they're in a completely unwilling rape scenario, that could pull me away even if there isn't penetration yet. If NTR is avoidable but its only avoidable by ignorance (aka it still happens like you have the choice to watch a scene or go to bed) I'll drop a game. I got my own issues with it, ontop of it just disgusting me outright. But, and big but here, I just dont agree with the framing here, in the slightest. It's constantly looking under the bed and its been a theme in this thread. I just think its a bit ridiculous with the evidence we have thus far. Hell even Julia is staying as far away from her husband.

This is like a northpole/southpole take on NTR. Northpole is like "you're not a real man unless you can share your women like a true cuck" South pole is like "You like NTR unless you're a completely overly possessive piece of shit once you think a characters hot" and I'm here just dead center like "im cool as long as I don't know it, see it, experience it, you're free to do what you want aslong as its before & not after we shared a moment if we're starting something, everything else is finished." gotta be some real elements to it otherwise it just feels hollow lol.


I think a lot of people can agree or acknowledge that it is not NTR, but it still doesn't make them attractive as an LI... under no circumstances will I watch a 'future/potential' LI grind their pussy on someone else's dick and still be attracted to them, nor (as the player in this case, not the MC) do I want to watch that LI jerk off that same dick later on. I don't really care who it's attached to if it isn't the MC. And I'll never be inclined to try to make a wife out of a whore.

So even by F95's lax NTR definition (which I am partial to, btw) this doesn't qualify for NTR. But as someone who greatly dislikes NTR, it's still too close for comfort. Doesn't matter if we're technically on their route or not (which is a super tired argument made by NTR enjoyers, btw).
This I Can almost FULLY agree with, yeah its not attractive to see other LI's in sexual provocative situations, talk about ex's, past sexual relations, etc. Not a fan of it myself, but its just not NTR which is the main issue I take with people that constantly preach about NTR on here. But thats also why choices exist, if it bugs you that much that blaire grinded, turn her down, if it bugs you victorias a prostitute futa, turn her down. I greatly dislike NTR too, but I still dont think its too close for comfort. People here are too harsh on dev's about how they wanna tell their story, they did literally nothing, blaire never even did anything with MC by that point and people are sounding alarms. Once the route starts is where I start the NTR line, because I cant tie people to an invisible leash to me. Doesn't mean in a relationship, doesn't mean dating, it means once intimacy with MC starts, in any regard, is when the cut off starts.

The only real alarm to me is that Dev said Victoria will optionally be part of situations with women, which up to that point, we thought Vic was gay(or trans-straight) so thats a bit odd. Which is why I dont see anything wrong with the blaire scene, she's obsessed with MC unreciprocated, but she did it to mock vic, and we were also under the assumption that vic was 'gay. '
 
Last edited:

th3n

Member
Jan 27, 2022
460
1,029
242
I didn't only say NOT IN A RELATIONSHIP i said considered "if in an active relationship", then went onto further elaborate. But regardless NTR's core definition, does largely refer to the state of being in a relationship/starting a relationship, and I'm using it properly even if we wanna take that route.

I said didn't have claim. AKA literally DID NOTHING with the MC yet, not even HINTS to a relationship lmao. You cant posess ownership over someone that you have yet to even get that far with, thats the most roundabout logic I've ever heard. So you're NTR'd if a love interest has a boyfriend that breaks up with them AFTER the MC meets them but they banged before breaking up? That makes 0 sense.

Even the context of my comment suggested what I said "THIS UPDATE" is when the NTR flags would start considering the MC Just basically started a somewhat intimate setting with them. & yes if we arent actively doing anything with the mother, sisters, childhood friends, and the game hasn't decided that the flag has been initiated for them yet, and they have to have a tragic falling out to push them into the idea of incest or realizing they fucked up, who am I to say otherwise? lol. Aslong as I dont have to be physically involved with everything going on, I could careless, but laying claim to everything the second the game starts doesn't make any sense. Theres so many great stories where characters start out in a relationship prior to getting with the MC, they're a love interest, but they didnt wait around their entire existence to leap into MCs arms.

just to be completely transparent, if a LI is introduced as a "used toy" and I liked her, I'll drop the game. If an LI is shown in past scenes where they get banged or have an orgy, or college days, w/e I'll drop the game. I'm not a fan at all of watching LI's in sexual situations, even if its out of their control and they're in a completely unwilling rape scenario, that could pull me away even if there isn't penetration yet. If NTR is avoidable but its only avoidable by ignorance (aka it still happens like you have the choice to watch a scene or go to bed) I'll drop a game. I got my own issues with it, ontop of it just disgusting me outright. But, and big but here, I just dont agree with the framing here, in the slightest. It's constantly looking under the bed and its been a theme in this thread. I just think its a bit ridiculous with the evidence we have thus far. Hell even Julia is staying as far away from her husband.

This is like a northpole/southpole take on NTR. Northpole is like "you're not a real man unless you can share your women like a true cuck" South pole is like "You like NTR unless you're a completely overly possessive piece of shit once you think a characters hot" and I'm here just dead center like "im cool as long as I don't know it, see it, experience it, you're free to do what you want aslong as its before & not after we shared a moment if we're starting something, everything else is finished." gotta be some real elements to it otherwise it just feels hollow lol.




This I Can almost FULLY agree with, yeah its not attractive to see other LI's in sexual provocative situations, talk about ex's, past sexual relations, etc. Not a fan of it myself, but its just not NTR which is the main issue I take with people that constantly preach about NTR on here. But thats also why choices exist, if it bugs you that much that blaire grinded, turn her down, if it bugs you victorias a prostitute futa, turn her down. I greatly dislike NTR too, but I still dont think its too close for comfort. People here are too harsh on dev's about how they wanna tell their story, they did literally nothing, blaire never even did anything with MC by that point and people are sounding alarms. Once the route starts is where I start the NTR line, because I cant tie people to an invisible leash to me. Doesn't mean in a relationship, doesn't mean dating, it means once intimacy with MC starts, in any regard, is when the cut off starts.

The only real alarm to me is that Dev said Victoria will optionally be part of situations with women, which up to that point, we thought Vic was gay(or trans-straight) so thats a bit odd. Which is why I dont see anything wrong with the blaire scene, she's obsessed with MC unreciprocated, but she did it to mock vic, and we were also under the assumption that vic was 'gay. '
Em, the netorare term is from the asian hentai, there you cannot count the number of crush ntr, where the mc of that hentai has nothing to do with the LI but feelings and it counts as ntr, even if is a onesided crush. In this case if you know she is going to be a LI (Love interest) then why TF would you want to see her in a ntr position or a position where she is being intimated with others??
 

ryansFLYIN

Active Member
Sep 19, 2022
536
1,875
267
Which is why I dont see anything wrong with the blaire scene, she's obsessed with MC unreciprocated, but she did it to mock vic, and we were also under the assumption that vic was 'gay. '
Maybe the grinding was to mock her, but giving her a handjob? If she was truly all-in on the MC, I find it hard to believe that she would do that to his roommate while he was across the hall. I believe that only happened if you were on Vic's path, but I don't think I had the time to get off of it after finding out she had a dick in between those two things happening.

The whole thing with Blaire is 90% of my gripe with this; she was truly a yandere for the MC, but not over-the-top at it. She's hot, to boot. And then... the grinding scene happens in front of the MC and I found myself just deleting the game as the other girls' paths were only 10% of my total interest in the game. I find the story remarkably annoying. I hate most of the LI's. There's fake choices. But Blaire was a fix for an archetype I had never really found interest in before. So, I hold a grudge because to me, and many other people here, what she did was gross and made my dick softer than a month old banana.
 

Raziel_8

Forum Fanatic
Dec 4, 2017
4,876
12,850
719
Well...this was a disappointing update.
The dates with the LI's were extremly short. The sex scenes with the girls were really short and lacking too, especially bad for LI's like Blair (completely shitty first time scene), Winter and Deliah...like 2min date, then they fuck, MC pumps three times over...

If she was truly all-in on the MC, I find it hard to believe that she would do that to his roommate while he was across the hall. I believe that only happened if you were on Vic's path, but I don't think I had the time to get off of it after finding out she had a dick in between those two things happening.
That is only Victor fantasizing, Blair isn't doing anything sexual with him.
Thought, i find the devs choice to include another guy (Victor) with the LI's crap (even if optional), but well not surprising seeing the rest of the game...
 
  • Yay, update!
Reactions: 6string420

Gojii

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2019
1,538
2,397
283
I'd just like a game where the futa isn't an antagonist. Such an overused trope to have them as rival dick that its tiresome. The fact they're effectively being used as a stand-in for a male friend/acquaintance is what is always so frustrating in a lot of games where there are multiple LIs and a futa is running around. I could give a fuck about NTR or not. Its a overused and lazy plot device to see a futa as a possible antagonist over and over if they aren't already one to begin with.

This is a perfect example of why some people freak out about futas in "harem" games, and that's sad imo.
 

Raziel_8

Forum Fanatic
Dec 4, 2017
4,876
12,850
719
I'd just like a game where the futa isn't an antagonist. Such an overused trope to have them as rival dick that its tiresome. The fact they're effectively being used as a stand-in for a male friend/acquaintance is what is always so frustrating in a lot of games where there are multiple LIs and a futa is running around. I could give a fuck about NTR or not. Its a overused and lazy plot device to see a futa as a possible antagonist over and over if they aren't already one to begin with.

This is a perfect example of why some people freak out about futas in "harem" games, and that's sad imo.
For one, it's not futa but a trans. It's a guy with a pair of fake tits which is saving money to get the rest done.
Don't remember any games i played where there was a optional futa/trans character as a antagonist, it's pretty much always a LI.
No, many harem fans don't like a second dick in the harem or are simply not interested in futa/trans to begin with.
Even more so when that character is getting involved with the other girls, or the futa fans want the MC getting dicked by the futa, or the futa should fuck the other harem girls...always more futa etc.
 

jvargo16

Member
Jun 8, 2018
184
178
197
I feel like all this drama would be avoided if the dev put a list of planned tags for the game. The past few pages have just been everyone complaining about NTR. When it comes to Vic with other girls, I'm hoping for more of an NTS situation rather than NTR where the MC can approve of Vic getting with someone or not.
 

Jinsoyun

Active Member
Sep 28, 2018
791
1,503
246
Am i the only one who thinks that "porn logic" in a game is fun, but when people honestly believe it on the forum, then it's just weird?

The start of the prologue clearly states that the characters in this story are all troubled, flawed and deeply damaged and i got to say that so far this has been true.

If you are not interested in it, then that's fine. If you found nobody in the game you liked, that's fine. If you drop the game for any reason or no reason, then that's fine.
But why is everyone bickering over tags, definitions and what a genre of game must or must not have as if creative freedom didn't exist? Everyone is free to voice their dislike or other opinions, but the moment someone comes down to say things like "i dislike this genre as defined by the urbandictionary's 2022-august edition and anyone who doesn't agree with me is bad", then i'm quite certain that they desperately need a break.

Can nobody just decide for themselves anymore?
 

ryansFLYIN

Active Member
Sep 19, 2022
536
1,875
267
That is only Victor fantasizing, Blair isn't doing anything sexual with him.
Thought, i find the devs choice to include another guy (Victor) with the LI's crap (even if optional), but well not surprising seeing the rest of the game...
I'll concede to that as it's been a while since I played that scene and I'm not about to go back just to check. But that just reminds me of another game that had an NTR dream scene and the dev didn't want to add the tag because 'it's just a dream' but... we still had to watch it. In the context of the story it may not have happened, but I very much did see it happen with my own eyes and that changes how I view a character. It's why I don't like omnipotent story telling where we immerse as the MC as we have information the MC does not that can change how we view/interact with another character.
 
Last edited:
3.30 star(s) 12 Votes