Deleted member 313508
Active Member
- Dec 1, 2017
- 519
- 887
- 260
Thinks you are? Or knows you are.One of my buddies in another thread made it because he thinks I'm a simp.
Thinks you are? Or knows you are.One of my buddies in another thread made it because he thinks I'm a simp.
never understood this. Like... Monogamy is such a strange concept to me. I know people get jealous and possessive, but monogamy always feels a little too close to codependent to me. And when in fantasy? Like disney princess style romance pairing off can make sense sure, if it's a tale of romance about just two people involved with maybe a teased 3rd for a love triangle for drama. But even then(especially then. Cut the knot, pair the spare in a one true threesome time!), why aren't poly relationships more normalized in fiction? I know more successful poly relationships in real life than I've seen in (non-porn) fiction.I only really like two throuples.
Usually it's monogamy all the way for me.
Not that bizarre. It's less about posessive and more about feeling valued in the relationship. When there are more than two people involved, if one of them start to favor one person over another in the throuple, it breeds that jealousy you're talking about. It's about keeping things in balance. Not so much possessing but feeling secure in a relationship that you won't be left behind by the others in the relationship.never understood this. Like... Monogamy is such a strange concept to me. I know people get jealous and possessive, but monogamy always feels a little too close to codependent to me. And when in fantasy? Like disney princess style romance pairing off can make sense sure, if it's a tale of romance about just two people involved with maybe a teased 3rd for a love triangle for drama. But even then(especially then. Cut the knot, pair the spare in a one true threesome time!), why aren't poly relationships more normalized in fiction? I know more successful poly relationships in real life than I've seen in (non-porn) fiction.
Such a bizarre thing to me.
In the real world? Yeah, sure, jealousy is killer in relationships and the more people, the more sources of jealousy. Hell 'that' jealousy often comes just fine from the two sources of insecurity and misunderstanding in perfectly faithful monogamous relationships. In fiction? I don't get it. Especially fiction which otherwise exemplifies a celebration of... well... sluttery. Here for instance. Guy is totally getting his wick wet in a dozen girls. But somehow it's preferable that he excludes all others for a single one at some point because "that's romance" isn't something I understand. Granted, I don't know where this story is ultimately going, NeonGhosts might well pair Guy off with a single girl in a way that works in the narrative, and thusfar that's more or less what I'm expecting. But as it stands that only seems to be really a thing with Ashe, and even then she seems open sexually to threesomes, and is more against the emotional infidelity. Which strikes me as realistic and pertinent to her character, but also ends up more or less forcing a choice where Guy has to decide if she's 'worth it' (along with sub branches of infidelity). which is where I'm going "nah, brah"Not that bizarre. It's less about posessive and more about feeling valued in the relationship. When there are more than two people involved, if one of them start to favor one person over another in the throuple, it breeds that jealousy you're talking about. It's about keeping things in balance. Not so much possessing but feeling secure in a relationship that you won't be left behind by the others in the relationship.
This is a bit hard for me to explain for while I do like Monogamy in these games.never understood this. Like... Monogamy is such a strange concept to me. I know people get jealous and possessive, but monogamy always feels a little too close to codependent to me. And when in fantasy? Like disney princess style romance pairing off can make sense sure, if it's a tale of romance about just two people involved with maybe a teased 3rd for a love triangle for drama. But even then(especially then. Cut the knot, pair the spare in a one true threesome time!), why aren't poly relationships more normalized in fiction? I know more successful poly relationships in real life than I've seen in (non-porn) fiction.
Such a bizarre thing to me.
The problem with polyamory or open relationships in such games is most people will not accept some other dude(or a gal) sleeping with their women and start bitching and moaning about forced NTR, except the people who are actively looking for such games.never understood this. Like... Monogamy is such a strange concept to me. I know people get jealous and possessive, but monogamy always feels a little too close to codependent to me. And when in fantasy? Like disney princess style romance pairing off can make sense sure, if it's a tale of romance about just two people involved with maybe a teased 3rd for a love triangle for drama. But even then(especially then. Cut the knot, pair the spare in a one true threesome time!), why aren't poly relationships more normalized in fiction? I know more successful poly relationships in real life than I've seen in (non-porn) fiction.
Such a bizarre thing to me.
Ask biology about it. Monogamy has been the way to go for most people since ancient times. Harems and the such have been always for the most rich and powerful like Epstein's Island.never understood this. Like... Monogamy is such a strange concept to me. I know people get jealous and possessive, but monogamy always feels a little too close to codependent to me. And when in fantasy? Like disney princess style romance pairing off can make sense sure, if it's a tale of romance about just two people involved with maybe a teased 3rd for a love triangle for drama. But even then(especially then. Cut the knot, pair the spare in a one true threesome time!), why aren't poly relationships more normalized in fiction? I know more successful poly relationships in real life than I've seen in (non-porn) fiction.
Such a bizarre thing to me.
What? It's literally the opposite, lmao. Humans were a largely polyamorous species all the way back then. Then as time went on, humans became more and more monogamous as society developed and advanced. It's a social construct, it's not the natural way of things whatsoever, but it's what works for most of society, and I don't see a problem with that.Ask biology about it. Monogamy has been the way to go for most people since ancient times.
It's biologically not very correct, sticking to one mate will restrict your ability to produce as many offsprings as possible.
What does producing as many children as possible have to do with relationships or being monogamous?sticking to one mate will restrict your ability to produce as many offsprings as possible.
Which with 8 fucking billion people on the planet...and the most longevity of our species ever...why your great grandparents had like 58 kids...because 55 of them would most likely be dead before the age of 20.It's biologically not very correct, sticking to one mate will restrict your ability to produce as many offsprings as possible.
I read a few studies about it and there is no conclusive answer on that one tho.
It has nothing to do with today's times, we are biologically programmed to do it and that's about it.What does producing as many children as possible have to do with relationships or being monogamous?
Fewer and fewer people want to raise children in this world,especially with all the current problems.
just enjoy each other,
in a monogamous relationship or with several persons,
you really don't have to have children in life to be happy !!![]()
Personally, I think it comes down to verisimilitude. Sure, in a work of fiction it's entirely possible to have a harem full of girls who are all happy to share the MC without issue, but in my experience games that do that come across as, well, fake. People just don't generally act like that, so having more than one (or maybe two) LI eager to join a time share either requires all the LIs have the same 'rare' personality, or it requires they act wildly out of character for the sake of the harem.In the real world? Yeah, sure, jealousy is killer in relationships and the more people, the more sources of jealousy. Hell 'that' jealousy often comes just fine from the two sources of insecurity and misunderstanding in perfectly faithful monogamous relationships. In fiction? I don't get it. Especially fiction which otherwise exemplifies a celebration of... well... sluttery. Here for instance. Guy is totally getting his wick wet in a dozen girls. But somehow it's preferable that he excludes all others for a single one at some point because "that's romance" isn't something I understand. Granted, I don't know where this story is ultimately going, NeonGhosts might well pair Guy off with a single girl in a way that works in the narrative, and thusfar that's more or less what I'm expecting. But as it stands that only seems to be really a thing with Ashe, and even then she seems open sexually to threesomes, and is more against the emotional infidelity. Which strikes me as realistic and pertinent to her character, but also ends up more or less forcing a choice where Guy has to decide if she's 'worth it' (along with sub branches of infidelity). which is where I'm going "nah, brah"
I at least understand the harem games where the MC is all like "I'm the only one you can sleep with, but I get anyone I want" without jealousy ever coming into play. Dickishly selfish it may be, it's fiction, and fictional people can be well fleshed out and deeply complex and be satisfying without being overly wishfullfillmenty. Like "WVM"s first two LI have absolutely workable motivations and justifications that can be woven into far more interesting and complex stories. (To be clear, WVM is not that interesting, narratively speaking.)
Or if going to force the harem...at least have writing skills (and actual knowledge of the human pysche and how people act) and force a lot of drama at times betwen the girls, forcing us (the MC) to deal with said jealousy/time-share/personality problems that inevitibly, as you say, in real life will always occur (and if you screw up girls will leave etc).Personally, I think it comes down to verisimilitude. Sure, in a work of fiction it's entirely possible to have a harem full of girls who are all happy to share the MC without issue, but in my experience games that do that come across as, well, fake. People just don't generally act like that, so having more than one (or maybe two) LI eager to join a time share either requires all the LIs have the same 'rare' personality, or it requires they act wildly out of character for the sake of the harem.
I'd much rather bite the bullet and allow the girls to react 'normally,' even if it's sometimes hard to choose. It keeps things grounded, and makes the romance feel more meaningful. Plus, it allows the rare girls who are into sharing to stand out - as they should.
That's how I see it, anyway. I suspect personal preference plays a very large role in this.