sadly the creator prefere to concentrate in bad ending and don't continu the story i'm bored for this game and bored for kidnapping of asami -_- ,This game had so much potential, but it was ruined by a boring kidnapping sequence that lasts forever , and added bad ending
Others Goodbye Eternity [v0.13.0] [RNGeusEX]
The creator prefers to add content that has been requested by those who support the game. My God, what a horrible person!
For those who would like to support the game, who found it too expensive, or who would like updates to be faster.
The game is currently 50% off on Gog and Itch.io. Buy it once and you won't have to pay for future updates
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
he must realise it on october 29 but still did not have it he prommised to add some skins and bad ending on this update. Also he tell that the new updates willl come after one mounth and had a more ending.
0.11 modded with unlocked gallery
You must be registered to see the links
|
You must be registered to see the links
Last edited:
Daame
Member
- May 20, 2022
- 466
- 540
- 250
still no reply from the developer i think it could be this friday or end of the month i am not shure
ah sorry just saw the last post he tell next
Daame
Member
- May 20, 2022
- 466
- 540
- 250
Daame
Member
- May 20, 2022
- 466
- 540
- 250
The creator prefers to add content that has been requested by those who support the game. My God, what a horrible person!
For those who would like to support the game, who found it too expensive, or who would like updates to be faster.
The game is currently 50% off on Gog and Itch.io. Buy it once and you won't have to pay for future updates
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
I’ve been following this game for a while, and I was excited to support it with a one-time purchase when it was first released. But reading your recent message about prioritizing content requests from "supporters" over customers who bought the game once is incredibly disappointing.
Let me get this straight: you're saying that those of us who paid full price, just once, for the game aren’t as important as those who are paying you regularly? And you're justifying this by offering a 50% discount while essentially making the rest of us feel like we’re not as valued? That’s not only frustrating, it’s insulting.
We are the ones who took a chance on your game when it first came out, when it was untested. We supported you by paying for the product, not knowing what the future would bring. And now you’re telling us that our feedback doesn’t matter as much as those who are paying you on an ongoing basis? That’s not the way to build a loyal community. We are the ones who made it possible for you to even get to the point where you could offer discounts. One-time buyers deserve respect, the same as any other customer. You can’t just push us aside because we’re not continuously lining your pockets.
The way this is being communicated makes it clear: you’re more interested in money than in valuing your initial supporters. If you're going to keep pushing this “supporter-first” mentality, maybe you should consider a full-on subscription model, because treating people who bought your game once like second-class citizens is a really bad look.
You’ve lost my trust and, frankly, my support. I didn’t just buy your game at full price — I also backed you on Patreon because I believed in what you were creating. But seeing this attitude toward the very people who helped you get here is disheartening. If this is how you plan to treat your customers and supporters, I can’t justify continuing to stand behind you. You really need to rethink how you communicate and start appreciating all the people who’ve supported your work, not just the ones currently paying you.
You purchased the game. That purchase gives you access to all current content and all future updates at no additional cost. That hasn’t changed.
People who contribute regularly through crowdfunding are not receiving special treatment. They’re funding the creation of additional content. Their participation and feedback influence the roadmap because they directly make that extra development possible. That’s how crowdfunding works.
One-time buyers are not downgraded or ignored. Their feedback is taken into account. It’s simply important to distinguish between the platform where the game is sold and the platform where the project is supported over time.
Patreon contributors aren’t making a single payment, they’re providing ongoing support. It’s normal that their input carries more weight regarding development priorities, especially since crowdfunding currently provides around 80% of the project’s resources.
In short, people who buy the game receive all existing content and every future update for free, those who want to be more involved support the project on Patreon and influence the pace and priorities of development.
You are directly contradicting yourself in a span of just couple of paragraphs -- having one's input carry more weight is giving them preferential treatment. Like you say, it is pretty normal so there is no point in trying to simultaneously pretend it's not something that is taking place. It's not going to help anyone whose feedback is given less weight feel any better, if anything it's just an extra insult you'd try to feed them such obvious bullshit how they're not treated differently when they in fact are "and it's normal".
What is the actual problem? Someone feels less valued than people who paid more? Like, in a perfect world everyone is equally valued, but there's deadlines and you need to focus on one aspect at a time and that might not be the content other people like. Not a single update would satisfy EVERYONE. MingTzu You're 'valued' less than people who paid more than you and valued more than people who paid less. They're running a business, bigger clients get more say, that's the real world.
You’re mixing two separate concepts and treating them as if they were the same. Purchasing the game and supporting ongoing development are not equivalent actions. Buying the game gives permanent access to the product and all future updates. That part is equal for everyone, and nothing about it depends on Patreon.
Crowdfunding is different by design. People who fund ongoing development month after month are not buying extra content; they are financing its creation. Their feedback is weighted more heavily only in the context of development priorities, because they are the ones enabling that extra development to exist in the first place. That’s how every crowdfunded project works, whether on Patreon, Kickstarter, or anywhere else.
This is not “preferential treatment” regarding the game itself. Everyone receives the same content, the same updates, at the same time, regardless of how much they paid. No one is downgraded, and no one loses access to anything.
What differs is the influence on the roadmap. Not the product.
There is no contradiction there. Two forms of support, two forms of involvement, one identical product for all.
itch.io or GoG is where you buy the game. Patreon is where you participate in its ongoing development. Confusing these two roles is the source of the misunderstanding.
StonR
Newbie
- May 3, 2025
- 44
- 63
- 88
Put it like this instead. Bob buys the game on GOG, he plays it a bit and enjoys it. Then he moves on to play other things. Perhaps he keeps track on on this game once in a while, but he's not really that devoted. Then there's Billy, now Billy is super devoted. He loves the game and what it's gonna become. Billy is excited to see more and he wants to help to make sure it reaches 1.0. Billy decides to support the game on Patreon every single month for 10, 15, 20, 25 bucks or whatever it is. Billy constantly provides feedback and opinions on the game and all it's aspects.
Now isn't it more important to listen to Billy over Bob? Billy puts himself out there. He makes an effort. Now I'm not saying that Bob isn't, but Bob exists out there somewhere. But all of a sudden, Emma discovers the game. But she isn't economically stable, so she just buys the game on GOG. Then she finds out that there is a Discord server. Now Emma is very vocal, she likes to write a ton. So Emma does that. She goes into the #suggestions channel and points out all the things she wanna see and have changed. RNG sees that and replies, quite optimistically. Now all of a sudden Emma is part of the community that supports the game. Is her voice less valuable than a Patreon supporter? Yes, absolutely. She just came there, while Billy has supported the game for several months on Patreon. He's seen the changes and additions over time. But all this doesn't mean that Emma is being ignored at all. It just means that there's an hierarchy, which Patreon probably has too since I assume there's different tiers.