I've never said those two are equivalent actions. Quite the opposite. I've only objected to your attempt to try to present different treatments as the same based on the treatments being in part the same.You’re mixing two separate concepts and treating them as if they were the same. Purchasing the game and supporting ongoing development are not equivalent actions. Buying the game gives permanent access to the product and all future updates. That part is equal for everyone, and nothing about it depends on Patreon.
I simply disagree. Extra ability to influence "roadmap, not the product" is de facto influence on the final shape of the product, when the roadmap in question determines what the complete product is like. Trying to present these as if there's no connection between the two is simply disingenuous, because i don't believe you aren't intelligent enough to recognize this connection yourself.This is not “preferential treatment” regarding the game itself. Everyone receives the same content, the same updates, at the same time, regardless of how much they paid. No one is downgraded, and no one loses access to anything.
What differs is the influence on the roadmap. Not the product.
While "everyone receives the same content" a subset of the customers has more influence over the actual nature of that content. People who paid less are paid less attention to in return, and their ability to determine what game they get is relatively limited. My only real point was, i think you're much better off simply acknowledging that different tiers of your customers do get different treatment and leave it at that. Because they are also smart enough to recognize it, and trying to gaslight them into thinking otherwise is only going to produce extra resentment on their part.
Last edited: