- Oct 29, 2018
- 1,132
- 1,611
Wow, thank's great music ! since I didn't recognize the Profile Pic I google it and sounds cool men, I liked it !Journey can fuck right off. But that's like, my opinion, man.
I am more of a New Traditionalist, if you're savvy to my my avatar
I'm torn between "Glad people are finding new music, nice!" and "You never heard of Devo? wtf."Wow, thank's great music ! since I didn't recognize the Profile Pic I google it and sounds cool men, I liked it !
Hi Guys, may I ask How do you make Sara appear again in nightclub to discovery more about her experiment?
Meh, it just means some of us are older than !!!I'm torn between "Glad people are finding new music, nice!" and "You never heard of Devo? wtf."
So terrible when middleschool me was trying to secretly get online to find boobies while my parents slept.All I know is, back in my day the internet used to scream in torturous agony whenever I tried to get online.
I started at 2600 baud. I remember the slow progress to 24.4 and how "amazing" that speed was, lmao. I could actually download small video clips in the short time of "over night".But if you were good, you could tell what baud rate you were getting by the number of squeals before the connection was made.
I'm torn between "Glad people are finding new music, nice!" and "You never heard of Devo? wtf."
THERE'S NO SEX WITH NANA YET
Wow nostalgia bomb.You must be registered to see the links
She's just a girl... The girl u want.
[historically, I think this is the first music video actually shot ON video and not film. Man, video was so shitty back in the day.]
I'm not sure what you're actually trying to say in this, unless you mean it was saved on a video cassette instead of a film reel. However, the reason it looks so shitty today is because those images were produced for a much smaller scale than today's monitors and TVs are made to handle. Because it's been scaled up to be playable on today's technology, it's been pixilated and warped throughout the images. Your phone has better resolution than a 20-inch TV from that era (and that was a big TV for most people).You must be registered to see the links
She sends out an aroma of undefined love,
that drips on down like a mist from above.
She's just a girl... The girl u want.
[historically, I think this is the first music video actually shot ON video and not film. Man, video was so shitty back in the day.]
I believe he means saved directly as a file instead of to film and then transferred to file later.I'm not sure what you're actually trying to say in this, unless you mean it was saved on a video cassette instead of a film reel. However, the reason it looks so shitty today is because those images were produced for a much smaller scale than today's monitors and TVs are made to handle. Because it's been scaled up to be playable on today's technology, it's been pixilated and warped throughout the images. Your phone has better resolution than a 20-inch TV from that era (and that was a big TV for most people).
It's not an illusion of memory that it looked better when we watched it on TV in the 80s and 90s. New stuff would look fine on old equipment (although the color balance might be off), but old video never scales up well on modern viewers.
Then it would still have to have been a transfer, since I don't think there was anything shot digitally until 1996, and that's an 80s video, unless we're talking about video broadcast vs film, but we've had that since the beginning of television broadcasting (1920s I think?) ... I guess it could be the first music video made live in a studio instead on filmed on a set first.I believe he means saved directly as a file instead of to film and then transferred to file later.
I don't know about that video at all, lol. I was just trying to interpret from what he said about it.Then it would still have to have been a transfer, since I don't think there was anything shot digitally until 1996, and that's an 80s video, unless we're talking about video broadcast vs film, but we've had that since the beginning of television broadcasting (1920s I think?) ... I guess it could be the first music video made live in a studio instead on filmed on a set first.
I am talking VHS style video rather than cellulous film that needs to be developed. I am not that up on the specifics.I'm not sure what you're actually trying to say in this, unless you mean it was saved on a video cassette instead of a film reel. However, the reason it looks so shitty today is because those images were produced for a much smaller scale than today's monitors and TVs are made to handle. Because it's been scaled up to be playable on today's technology, it's been pixilated and warped throughout the images. Your phone has better resolution than a 20-inch TV from that era (and that was a big TV for most people).
It's not an illusion of memory that it looked better when we watched it on TV in the 80s and 90s. New stuff would look fine on old equipment (although the color balance might be off), but old video never scales up well on modern viewers.
The internet? In my day, we had a local BBS connected to FIDOnet...All I know is, back in my day the internet used to scream in torturous agony whenever I tried to get online.
Get off our lawn, you whipper-snappers!Somebody come pick up your grandparents they're stuck in a reminiscence loop.