- Jan 24, 2018
- 3,895
- 12,788
Yeah would have been funnier.I still maintain it would've been far funnier to have left the warning about Nana.
Yeah would have been funnier.I still maintain it would've been far funnier to have left the warning about Nana.
I am in the same boat.I still maintain it would've been far funnier to have left the warning about Nana.
Significant update to the relationship chart.My version of Joey's Relationship Wiki*
UPDATE: Changes reflect MC's relationships thru v0.69 | Part 5Also made some layout updates to streamline some of the groups
View attachment 4330313
*Joey still updates occasionally ... if I see the newest ones I'll link it here
Shame, I'm sure MB was involved in the discussion where we were all laughing about the prospect, months back.I am in the same boat.
But Boss said, am not allowed to
and ive been here longer than you,means nothing lol.I've been here longer than you lol
186-1 is save now from 4 to 5
186-2 is the update 69
I saw this hours ago but glad you took the time to post this. Thanks for Karen, I mean caring.So, seeing as you've been a member for longer, one would be safe in assuming that you're able to read & also capable of successfully interpreting what you read?
As such, I suggest you read the text in the OP again. It does not say what you claim it says.
View attachment 4330224
Amy is not Nana.
It was changed shortly after the previous version was uploaded, where sex with Nana ocurred.
You will need to complete Part 4 first, before moving to Part 5, anyway. So you will naturally get past the part where you fuck Nana, just before the end of Part 4.
Good for you, and thanks for upping your post count.and ive been here longer than you,means nothing lol.
You keep posting things that you intend to use as deflection, but all they do is make your original question & subsequent posts seem even more ridiculous.I saw this hours ago but glad you took the time to post this. Thanks for Karen, I mean caring.
Possibly, but then the game would be 20+GB, instead of currently being 445MB.wouldn't it just be easier to put it all in one ? instead of parts.
No, it was discussed today, it would be awful and more complicated to do that because of the file size.wouldn't it just be easier to put it all in one ? instead of parts.
Damn, I'm not going to restart the debate. Look at the rest of the conversation, I have already given a solution and hints to resolve this problem. I will still give another clue, there are sites and software to go beyond the limit, you just have to take the trouble to search a little,And the lion's share of us wouldn't be able to play it, because most free accounts cannot download more than 5 GB of data at a time without paying for a subscription from the sites that host the files. How about you let the Dev do what they do and when you make a game, you can put it out in 10 GB blocks instead, k?
LMFAO!! Whilst you are correct, a shed load of people don't even read the warnings in the OP.Damn, I'm not going to restart the debate. Look at the rest of the conversation, I have already given a solution and hints to resolve this problem. I will still give another clue, there are sites and software to go beyond the limit, you just have to take the trouble to search a little,
It wouldn't even surprise me if the solution already exists on this forum. But you have to take the trouble to search a little.
Yeah would have been funnier.