- Feb 19, 2021
- 4,191
- 10,272
Noam Chomsky also saidOh, I can empathize with that. I know how you feel. I wish they would at least let you 'react' with various emojis to the reviews (similar to steam) instead of just leaving a 'like' or just ignoring it.
That said, I'm not sure if "reporting" what we deem to be a stupid opinion or even a false claim is such a great idea. I think we've been long enough on the internet to know it can easily be used an abused to somewhat curate the reviews on a given game.
In the words of the old Noam Chomsky, "there's only one stance you can take regarding freedom of speech, and that's how you react to your opposition." ... in this case, uninformed reviews.
So, I think for the most part reviews are functioning properly. There are good ones, there are unfair ones, and there are glaring dumb ones. It's the reader's duty to determine which is which.
Or at least, that's what I think.
" Terribly sorry to shock people. It’s true that I don’t understand what dialectic is. I can repeat the words in these responses – e.g., the first sentence. But can you tell me what it means? "
Not exactly the first authority (lol anarchist authority) I'd go to to understand conflict.
If a review is objectively false then it doesn't contribute to a productive dialogue. If we could reply directly to reviews and have those responses attached to the review then it wouldn't be an issue but as it stands someone clicks on the reviews for this game to decide if they wanna play it or not and the first thing they see is some dude spewing shit out his mouth.