- Jan 19, 2022
- 326
- 653
…
If it was (and is) about what make sense and logic, then only around 1/3, less for my post, would be here.
…
ISN’T THAT THE TRUTH!
I agree with you regarding peoples actions and common sense & logic … however some of the ensuing insanity is due to ignorance not stupidity. So posts like yours and mine that ”fill in the blanks” of NOT knowing will help those that have the desire to NOT be clueless.
I recall exactly this as well. The exact technical specs/details … I do not recall either ... but quality wasn’t the highest priority factor for images/compression at that time. The highest priority then was that it actually worked and in X time.If my memory serves me right, although I can't find it on the internet, one requirement at one time for an losy image compression was to transfer a image over a normal telephone line in less then one minute.
I had NO Idea WHO exactly this was.Also bonus point if can name this lady and the source of her image:
View attachment 3157747
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
However I knew exactly WHERE it came from!
It has the “Early Playboy Centerfold” level of model beauty, set, staging & quality is in the very DNA of the photo.
Which prior to the internet was the Gold Standard.
I would have had better luck identifying the individual if you chose one 10-20 years later
from the 70s-80s vs the 60’s.
However you inspired me to provide the answer for my images & bonus point question above.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited: