The_Melchior
Newbie
- Jun 14, 2019
- 41
- 82
- 137
I would point out that while many can say their ancestor who fought for the Confederacy didn't own slaves, they doubtless still depended on them: Slaves were often rented from plantations for field work by poorer landowners. Furthermore said non-slaveowners would be completely dependent on the nearby plantation for other resources such as a Smithy, grain milling, and more. Almost all of these services were cheaper due to the use of slavery.Many people who talk about their ancestors in the confederacy scream that their ancestors never owned a slave, and did not fight to protect slavery.
The truth is, that most of their ancestors, did not in fact own slaves, but those who fought, did fight for a government that was fighting to protect slavery for the same reason that the government in the game was.
Whether that was the persons stated reason for fighting, or not. They did fight for a government, that was hellbent on protecting slavery.
Their economy heavily depends on slavery.
Take away the slavery, and the economy will collapse.
Those rich people who actually owned the slaves, and were often connected in some way to high level public officials and were often those very same high level public officials, who risked losing everything if the government chose not to protect slavery.
Even in the south, slaves were far too expensive for the common family to own, but then, the vast majority of the slaves were owned by the rich plantation owners, and not the common people.
The case would be similar in the game.
The vast majority of the slaves would be owned by the elite and big business, with the businesses such as factory's, farms and mines owning the majority of those.
I use the confederacy for comparisons, because the parallels with slavery in the game are nearly identical.
For the Desert Elves, I'm going to say its probably just a case of not being worth the effort. An attack to enslave the tribes might net a few hundred slaves, but it would require a logistics train (transportation, capture, firepower) in the desert that could be expensive. This is assuming that it doesn't end in a massacre that even some of the pro-slaver types might wince at.
The slaves you gain would probably be considered lower value compared to the other slaves on the market in the modern age.
I'm betting the raiders did the math and found it was more profitable to extort them than capture all of them.