I like how you just ignored the entire rest of that comment and focused on pedantry, but I'm splitting hair. I don't care 'bout your belly on the chest or ribs in the stomach man, I just find the art off is all. Hell my issue has never even been seeing ribs, at no point did I state that. It's about the inside skeleton not being imagined as a limitation properly thus getting weird shit like whatever Cecille's shoulder is in that picture.
You did not
initially bring up ribs. But look back and see what the argument was:
post 1: kiki013 brought up the ribs and 6 pack as explicitly the reason why she looks weird.
post 2: you responded with agreeing she looks weird without explaining why.
post 3: I replied to both of you explaining fat covers both the sixpack and the ribs
post 4: you told me I am wrong about ribs because ribs are not in your belly (implying fat cannot cover them). You also said the rest of the anatomy bothers you.
post 5: I told you you are wrong about ribs and fat.
post 6: post quoted above where you claim you never talked about ribs and I am putting words in your mouth.
You absolutely did talk about ribs.
Not in your very first post where you simply did not explain what bothers you.
But in your second post (post 4 in the argument). citation:
You also in that post clarified that this is not what really bothers you.
What bothers you is the armpit anatomy. I... don't agree.
But I focused on addressing the ribs issue because that was something that is far more objective and easily proven.
