Sooo... Still close to nothing to see here? How long would you say a playthrough of the latest version would take?Come back in a year or two fam.
Sooo... Still close to nothing to see here? How long would you say a playthrough of the latest version would take?Come back in a year or two fam.
Actually that sort of depends on the context. It says alot about how culture has changed in modern times, that this is even a debate.A soldier is a murderer if he kills POWs for example, and after the choke hold that's basically what carter was imo.
Still murdering Carter might have been necessary, with how corrupt the city is, so i am not against doing it.
This game its really slow burn, like a tortoise with an anchor. But I like the plot and its not boring to play itSooo... Still close to nothing to see here? How long would you say a playthrough of the latest version would take?
Maybe excuse wasn't the right term, English isn't my mother tongue.You don't understand. Self defense is not an EXCUSE. Because the MC acted in self defense against an attack with a deadly weapon by an attacker with the stated intent to kill, he is with in his rights to use whatever force he chooses, and can not be charged with murder. As stated a couple posts back, the MC has no legal obligation to spare Carter.
Theres no predicting what the Hillside legal system will decide to do, but in the real world the MC would not be charged with a crime and any attempt to do so would be set aside by a court.
Which imo because carter was disarmed and in a choke hold he fails the third and potentially the first requirementA defendant is said to have legally acted in self-defense under California state law if he/she:
If the above are true, then:
- reasonably believed that he/she was in “imminent danger” of suffering bodily injury,
- reasonably believed that the immediate use of force was necessary to defend against that reasonable fear of imminent peril, and
- used no more force than was reasonably necessary to defend against that danger.1
- a defendant has a valid legal defense, and
- is not liable for a crime.
You guys might disagree but that's how i see it.6.4. Murder, Penal Code 187 PC
Penal Code 187 says that murder is the intentional killing of another withYou must be registered to see the links. Malice aforethought is defined as an unlawful intention to kill or acting with a reckless disregard for human life.
If a person is in imminent danger of being killed, he/she may take whatever measures that are necessary to prevent the killing. Deadly force is obviously expected. The force will be excused if reasonable and not excessive to prevent harm.
The Flannel doctrine often shows up in murder cases where:
The doctrine is also referred to as “
- the defendant is charged with murder (per PC 187), and
- the accused says he/she committed the murder because he/she was acting in self-defense.
You must be registered to see the links.” It applies when the accused kills another person based on an honest but unreasonable belief in the need to use deadly force in self-defense.
To go into effect, the flannel doctrine requires a showing that:
The doctrine is not really a defense per se, although it applies like a partial defense.
- the accused believed that he/she was in imminent peril of being killed or suffering great bodily injury,
- the accused believed that the immediate use of deadly force was necessary to defend himself/herself, and
- at least one of these beliefs was unreasonable.21
A jury finding that the accused acted in imperfect self-defense results in a charge being reduced from:
- murder (with a possible life in prison sentence)
- to voluntary manslaughter (which is punished with three to eleven years in prison).
I guess the difference here is that i really don't see Carter as having any chance of escaping or badly hurting the MC when the MC managed to choke hold him.Actually that sort of depends on the context. It says alot about how culture has changed in modern times, that this is even a debate.
What possible moral obligation should I be expected to have to feed, clothe, bathe, medicate, and devote manpower to guarding men who tried to kill me and my friends? Especially in an active conflict? Men whom I have every reason to believe will go right back to trying to kill me and mine if freed?
That's a tough call, morally speaking. The ONLY obligation that comes into play here is a practical one and not a moral one: You would want the other side to treat their POWs as well as you treat your POWs...but that's heavily dependent on an honor system and if the other side is not culturally similar to yours, their idea of honor and their idea of humane conduct could be radically different from yours. the WW2 conflict with Japan is a good example of this....Americans were apalled to discover how their POWs had been treated by the Japanese as various Japanese POW camps were liberated. Starvation, torture, abuse was common.
But many Japanese soldiers of that time considered those who allowed themselves to be captured alive to be the lowest form of cowards and honorless dogs, and resented being forced to guard them and devote vital war resources to them rather than being out in the battlefield with their fellow soldiers. Every bit of food, medicine, and clothing being routed to these "honorless dogs" was food, medicine and clothing that wasn't going to the frontline soldiers who needed them. Every guard stuck in those POW camps was another soldier unable to fight to protect his brothers-in-arms and homeland. That's how they saw it.
Western notions of honor and humane treatment were very different from Eastern notions of honor and humane treatment. They still are today. Which side's "right"? The side that wins, obviously.
Setting that aside, by no reasonable means could Carter be considered a POW so it's moot. He was not remotely helpless. He was in an inferior position, against a superior opponent, sure. But in an active and ongoing struggle, both parties always have a fighting chance. I am not obligated to allow someone who is trying to kill me and those I care about to keep on struggling to do so until they manage to get lucky, or pull out yet another hidden weapon.
Carter is a grown, fit, healthy man who has had at least as much close combat/subdual training as was required to make it through the police academy and has already shown himself to be armed with multiple weapons and shown the will to use them.
You don't get to force a confrontation on someone else and then cry foul when it turns out they're more dangerous than you and willing to use the exact same(or even greater) level of force on you that you were all too happy to use on them when you thought you had the upper hand.
Respectfully, use of force in self defense has to be proportional. You can't kill someone if you are shoved. The standard is, 'would a reasonable person perceive an immediate threat of grave bodily harm or death to themselves or others, having exhausted all options, such as retreat?' Unless 'Fake California' passed a Stand Your Ground Law which removes the duty to retreat, that may be where a prosecutor may have a point.You don't understand. Self defense is not an EXCUSE. Because the MC acted in self defense against an attack with a deadly weapon by an attacker with the stated intent to kill, he is with in his rights to use whatever force he chooses, and can not be charged with murder. As stated a couple posts back, the MC has no legal obligation to spare Carter.
Theres no predicting what the Hillside legal system will decide to do, but in the real world the MC would not be charged with a crime and any attempt to do so would be set aside by a court.
Oh, come on, that's not a college: it's a high school.I'm going to sound off a bit about Emma being underage. I personally believe she is a legal adult, albeit an immature one. It is possible that she is intended to be underage or at least play into that fetish, though. She is attending "college" which in the US denotes a 2-year or 4-year postsecondary institution but in the UK can mean more of what people in the states call a prep school. I only bring this up because the game also uses some other UK jargon even though it takes place in a Hollywood, CA knock-off. But even if she is going to a prep school (some of them don't have uniforms) that doesn't mean that she cannot be over 18 if she is in her senior year.
You can believe every word of this if you wish. But there is no biological reason why Charlotte couldn't have had two children two years apart when she was 19 and 21. Or even 4-5 years earlier for that matter. Relative youth would also explain why the father was unable or unwilling to take responsibility for them. What is harder to believe is that she became a supermodel after having two kids, but what the hell? Let's suspend our disbelief for the sake of the show. My daughter is 22 and still doesn't drive so Emma not driving is a signifying trait but not an unassailable proof of her age. So you could be right. But it is probably going to have to sit in your headcanon for a while because she has been seen nude and Patreon bucks are on the line. You do have a good point about Suzi, but memory is a funny thing. My dad died when I was seven and my sister, who was an Irish twin, barely remembers him at all even though we were only born 14 months apart and I have many memories of him. My youngest sister, who was only four, also says she has many memories of him. So It differs from person to person. Since we don't know exactly when he left we can only guess. My estimates are no more provable than yours are.Oh, come on, that's not a college: it's a high school.
Come on, just check the bio stats of characters (main game screen ---> characters) and compare every little things the characters tell about themselves in the game. Emma is 15, and this is why she can't drive (you drive at 16 in the US).
Charlotte is 39 (she turns 40 during the story). Lucy is 34. Suzi is 20. Emma is 15. Every damn detail the Llodys say about themselves during the game ONLY fits IF Emma is 15. She simply can't be 18.
Just remember this: Suzi is 20 and she remembers very well their dad, but Emma tells MC that her dad left them soon after she was born and she doesn't even know him.
Well, hopefully we see some scenes in the next update however I don't think there will be any Char scenes due to the animosity that'll remain after the murder. Part of me feels it's being rushed up.Well now that the "Stalker" is beaten, maybe the MC's terminal case of drydick finally gets cured. lol
Though so much has been made of the MC being this hyper-virtuous guy that I have a hard time imagining any scenario that would let him pursue multiple girls simultaneously without it being wildly contradictory to everything else that's happened to this point.
So I imagine soon we'll have to pick a girl(Charlottte or Lucy) and it will lock out the other. Maaaaaaaybe fool around on the side with Kayla or Suzi's girlfriend but again that would feel so counter to everything else that's happened up to now.
I can't possibly envision any scenario at this point for MC to get with Emma that wouldn't A) Feel creepy AF(She acts like a 10 year old and is firmly locked in a daughter/father dynamic with MC), and B) Result in MC needing to hire a bodyguard to protect him from Charlotte/Lucy/Suzi both
Oh, there's going to be minimal blowback on the MC. He did it in self defense and Carter was corrupt but there's a likely chance it may be exploited for future drama (and next update will deal with what you gotta do with the body, likely they'll just dump it there and leave). Imagine asking Charlotte to give you and Carter's corpse a ride to the closest landfill lmao.It would be helpful if those discussing Carter's killing to familiarize yourselves with the definition of murder, which is a legal matter not a moral one. Self defense mitigates a murder charge even if the killing was intentional. Carter assaulted the MC with a deadly weapon and the stated intent to kill him and others immediately present. It is unarguable that the MC acted in self defense and his actions will be judged in that context. The MC is not under any obligation to mitigate the force/violence of his defense under those circumstances. Yes the MC killed Carter. However he committed neither murder, nor manslaughter, nor homicide. The circumstances surrounding Carter's attack means that while the MC was a willing killer, he was not a murderer.
In any event these arguments are all moot. The only person that knows the MCs intent is the MC. All anyone else can testify too is that Carter attacked the MC with a knife and was killed in the struggle as the MC defended himself.
Agent Fox is an interesting character. I do think there'll be an option where we can pick her as an LI. However that might be very far off and might interfere with the Char route I'm going on probsAhah, true. But I guess Agent Fox is a good girl here. She will probably learn about that "incident" with Carter and use it as leverage to force the MC to cooperate in her plan to catch all the bastards of Hillside, but that's all.
Man, I just want to believe that you're rebutting just like that, for the sake of it.You can believe every word of this if you wish. But there is no biological reason why Charlotte couldn't have had two children two years apart when she was 19 and 21. Or even 4-5 years earlier for that matter. Relative youth would also explain why the father was unable or unwilling to take responsibility for them. What is harder to believe is that she became a supermodel after having two kids, but what the hell? Let's suspend our disbelief for the sake of the show. My daughter is 22 and still doesn't drive so Emma not driving is a signifying trait but not an unassailable proof of her age. So you could be right. But it is probably going to have to sit in your headcanon for a while because she has been seen nude and Patreon bucks are on the line. You do have a good point about Suzi, but memory is a funny thing. My dad died when I was seven and my sister, who was an Irish twin, barely remembers him at all even though we were only born 14 months apart and I have many memories of him. My youngest sister, who was only four, also says she has many memories of him. So It differs from person to person. Since we don't know exactly when he left we can only guess. My estimates are no more provable than yours are.
Man, you saw her in 1 scene only.Agent Fox is an interesting character. I do think there'll be an option where we can pick her as an LI. However that might be very far off and might interfere with the Char route I'm going on probs
I accepted Kayla's offer. I dont recall the exact words but I did not get the impression that this closed off the Charlotte route.In any case, the latest update had a part where Kaylah told Charlotte that the MC turned her down. So I think Charlotte route would only be available if you're loyal to her. Harem or any "Dual" endings seem unlikely, at least not any of the endings involving Charlotte.
I assume MC will send Charlotte to take Emma home, then call his bartender warbuddy to come help him dispose of the body.Oh, there's going to be minimal blowback on the MC. He did it in self defense and Carter was corrupt but there's a likely chance it may be exploited for future drama (and next update will deal with what you gotta do with the body, likely they'll just dump it there and leave). Imagine asking Charlotte to give you and Carter's corpse a ride to the closest landfill lmao.
Considering his last absence, end of 2022 seems very unlikely. Even if there will be only two updates.Man, you saw her in 1 scene only.
Honestly, I think the story is near the end. I don't think we will see more than 2 more update.
I do remember that DB wrote here that he was planning to complete the game by the end of 2022.
I didn't dispute that she was of high school age. You know... 18. I just clarified in the post that you initially responded to that it could be what is called in the UK a college. What in the US would be called a prep school. The last two years of high school that is meant to prepare you for what is called college in the US and University in the UK. The game uses a lot of terminology from the UK, which is cause for confusion amongst folks who aren't down with the lingo.Man, I just want to believe that you're rebutting just like that, for the sake of it.
We - me, you, everybody - are totally and perfectly aware that the place MC is driving Emma to in the morning is a high school.
Yeah that super long delay pretty much nullifies any "end of 22" projections, I would thinkMan, you saw her in 1 scene only.
Honestly, I think the story is near the end. I don't think we will see more than 2 more update.
I do remember that DB wrote here that he was planning to complete the game by the end of 2022.
I am pretty sure I have maximum Emma points (don't know if that means a route choice or not) and got the Dad phone.I had a doubt which I raised a few posts ago. If you're on the Emma route, does she still save the MC's number as "Dad"?
I still just feel uncomfortable af because Emma is literally a 14 y/o from what she looks like.