Opps, missed that part. I'll reread that part on the phone while doing the Guide update.There is one.
Yvette invites MC at the nightbar to meet her at the gym.
What time are you going to the gym? Has to be 02:30hrs in the morning or later. Also, might try going to the gym from different locations.Can someone help me with meeting Mercedes at the gym? I see that shes at workout on the subdermal montior but I literally cannot see her when I go to the gym.
thank's, so it's random and i have to keep trying. Most of the time she only want's to bang )There IS a shower scene at night, but it's almost the same as the others.
jojo901 You need to see all the shower scenes first, then in her skimpy dress (white skirt, blue top) invite her to have a drink and at some point in the conversation she will tell you to go to somewhere else. From what I saw, it has a random chance to happen, so you either save scam or keep trying.
yes, i got all new scenes on my phone, the only thing missing is the invitation, but i keep trying.There is no shower scene at night? Did you get the Yoga scenes with her and then lift weights with her five times in her skimpy bikini? That triggers the newest shower scene. The clues on your phone will tell you everything.
It's a 50% chance of either of the two when you have already seen the shower scene after the workout and it ended with sex.thank's, so it's random and i have to keep trying. Most of the time she only want's to bang )
ok im tired of looking since there is so many posts ill post an error i get while Amy is posing in the gym.
While running game code:
File "renpy/common/000statements.rpy", line 570, in execute_call_screen
store._return = renpy.call_screen(name, *args, **kwargs)
File "game/gui_screens.rpy", line 4409, in execute
File "game/gui_screens.rpy", line 4409, in execute
File "game/gui_screens.rpy", line 4427, in execute
File "game/gui_screens.rpy", line 4428, in execute
File "game/gui_screens.rpy", line 4428, in <module>
NameError: name 'l_who1' is not defined
-- Full Traceback ------------------------------------------------------------
Full traceback:
File "renpy/bootstrap.py", line 326, in bootstrap
renpy.main.main()
File "renpy/main.py", line 617, in main
run(restart)
File "renpy/main.py", line 148, in run
renpy.execution.run_context(True)
File "renpy/execution.py", line 922, in run_context
context.run()
File "script.rpyc", line 704, in script call
File "appointments_workout.rpyc", line 807, in script call
File "appointments_workout.rpyc", line 1709, in script call
File "interactive_posing.rpyc", line 51, in script
File "script.rpyc", line 704, in script call
File "appointments_workout.rpyc", line 807, in script call
File "appointments_workout.rpyc", line 1709, in script call
File "interactive_posing.rpyc", line 51, in script
File "renpy/ast.py", line 1969, in execute
self.call("execute")
File "renpy/ast.py", line 1957, in call
return renpy.statements.call(method, parsed, *args, **kwargs)
File "renpy/statements.py", line 278, in call
return method(parsed, *args, **kwargs)
File "renpy/common/000statements.rpy", line 570, in execute_call_screen
store._return = renpy.call_screen(name, *args, **kwargs)
File "renpy/exports.py", line 2983, in call_screen
rv = renpy.ui.interact(mouse="screen", type="screen", roll_forward=roll_forward)
File "renpy/ui.py", line 298, in interact
rv = renpy.game.interface.interact(roll_forward=roll_forward, **kwargs)
File "renpy/display/core.py", line 3101, in interact
repeat, rv = self.interact_core(preloads=preloads, trans_pause=trans_pause, pause=pause, pause_start=pause_start, **kwargs)
File "renpy/display/core.py", line 3512, in interact_core
root_widget.visit_all(lambda i : i.per_interact())
File "renpy/display/core.py", line 567, in visit_all
d.visit_all(callback, seen)
File "renpy/display/core.py", line 567, in visit_all
d.visit_all(callback, seen)
File "renpy/display/core.py", line 567, in visit_all
d.visit_all(callback, seen)
File "renpy/display/screen.py", line 432, in visit_all
callback(self)
File "renpy/display/core.py", line 3512, in <lambda>
root_widget.visit_all(lambda i : i.per_interact())
File "renpy/display/screen.py", line 443, in per_interact
self.update()
File "renpy/display/screen.py", line 631, in update
self.screen.function(**self.scope)
File "game/gui_screens.rpy", line 4409, in execute
File "game/gui_screens.rpy", line 4409, in execute
File "game/gui_screens.rpy", line 4427, in execute
File "game/gui_screens.rpy", line 4428, in execute
File "renpy/ast.py", line 191, in evaluate
args.append(renpy.python.py_eval(v, locals=scope))
File "renpy/python.py", line 2249, in py_eval
return py_eval_bytecode(code, globals, locals)
File "renpy/python.py", line 2242, in py_eval_bytecode
return eval(bytecode, globals, locals)
File "game/gui_screens.rpy", line 4428, in <module>
NameError: name 'l_who1' is not defined
Windows-10-10.0.22621
Ren'Py 7.4.4.1439
Holiday Island 0.4.5.0
Fri Jun 28 19:57:16 2024
Fixes anyone?
Nobody, as 0.4.4 never existed.Anyone that have a 0.4.4 save file
Probably easier and best to just add the Quick Fix Darkhound did 2 days ago for this...when that happens click on console, type I_who1=t_jennifer
then resume and ignore the error, if it persists
then the latest update before the one we just gott thenwhen that happens click on console, type I_who1=t_jennifer
then resume and ignore the error, if it persists
Wow... somebody seems especially butt-hurt. Y'know, they make a medicated ointment for that...Yes. I'm very well aware this "community" is full of dick riders for a dev who makes minimal content updates once every 9 months. Compared to his pre 2020 where he made the same amount of content in 3-4 months. Regardless. My point still stands.
What is even more sad is that some of you live on this specific thread and reply every day on it. Ouch. This thread/dev essentially has discord mods lol.
Or... unlike almost every other game on F95, it could be primarily an open-world game, kinda like an adult/pr0n equivalent of Nintendo's Endless Ocean... just food for thought.Did you actually read my post or did you just skim and an came to a conclusion based on what you think i mean vs what i actually said? Your comments are so scatter brained they don't actually make sense.
I never once complained about the release rate. Did you not understand a single point i was making? The game after 7 years is at best 21% done lets pretend it is 25% done that means given the same pace of development the game will be finished in 21 years for a total development time of 28 years. It is not unreasonable to say just shy of 3 decades development cycle for the game is lunacy.
It is not insane to say given the fact that feature creep has resulted in a development time at least two times longer then the average pro ball player's career, that maybe just maybe this game got away from the developer and that anything he can learn from this project has been learned and he should move on to a project that can be finished in 2 to 5 years.
Lets be clear there is no way this game will EVER be finished unless it gets triaged. This game will not still be under development for another two decades.
I have not advocated for a quicker release schedule the fact that you think this is what I am advocating means you lack either basic reading comprehension or like I suspect didn't bother to actually read my post.
When your development time is so long that you have to redo work to keep up with technology changes you get into the duke nukem issue. This isn't saying redoing work is bad it is saying that when you are redoing old renders and your game is not even a quarter done after 7 years then maybe it is time to start on a new project that ACTUALLY has a hope in hell of being completed.
Maybe the better choice is to triage the game and remove 2/3 of the characters with the least amount of progress and finish the game in 3 years. The fact is the game's status quo development cycle is a failure because it will never be finished. Part of development is cutting content, this game needs to either be abandoned or triaged.
I am not saying anything unreasonable here. And if you actually read my post it is not an attack on the developer at all.