Now you can see from my previous comments that I'm very critical of the business model that this dev is following but I actually kinda disagree with you on this take.
Yes, there are many more Naruto IP games out there but none of them got me hooked. I don't even like parodies but this one did a number on me. I must admit, I'll give credit where it's due; the guy creates good shots, hot scenarios, good angles and quality art even if they're AI. He is creative, I really don't have a single issue with the content. Maybe just the frequency of updates. It's just that this business model is so horrendous it kinda cancels out everything good about the game.
He really should reconsider this decision. I'm almost sure he'd make a lot more money if he stops thinking so much about piracy and starts trusting his supporters. We were his supporters, not customers. I don't want to buy a WIP product, I just wanted to support an ambitious creator.
This is my stance as well. I believe his work is nice, and the game is good, and many around here are just sending full hatred due paywalls.
I personally didn't subscribe myself because as I said, I don't like paywall mechanics. I have nothing against the dev, it's his choice, who decides to subscribe it's their decision, I have no right to decide where others should put their money. But I can decide mine.
At the same time, while I don't agree with him, I still understand he wants to protect his property. I would much rather prefer that the time invested in the paywall system was invest more into the game, but who am I to judge.
Personally I just don't agree with it because it affects more the possible consumer than actual pirates. Consumer might not invest due the paywalls, while pirates will simply start throwing mean comments to the dev. Sure I download games here, but I end up buying or supporting the games when I feel the game and or dev deserves to (and if I can support it of course). And I'm sure many others around here have the same criteria.
I have no ill-hatred towars the dev, as some kinds in the comments around here, but as I said, I believe this stance brings more harm than good. Pirates will always be pirates, while possible consumers are more affected by this. It's like Gabe Newell said, piracy isn't a pricing problem, is an access problem. And it's true, when Steam started working on Russia the piracy fell down considerably.
Anyway, hopefully in the future he rethinks it better, because I actually like the game (and most of you do, you just don't want to admit it) and I would like to support the dev more directly. But EA already fucked me once with Sim City and their DRM, so yeah, it's my personal stance.
Finally, I understand you guys are angry due paywalls, but still there are ways to show your feedback. It's not like insulting the dev will make him rethink about it.